Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3188745.3188788acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Inapproximability of the independent set polynomial in the complex plane

Published: 20 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We study the complexity of approximating the value of the independent set polynomial ZG(λ) of a graph G with maximum degree Δ when the activity λ is a complex number.
When λ is real, the complexity picture is well-understood, and is captured by two real-valued thresholds λ* and λc, which depend on Δ and satisfy 0<λ*c. It is known that if λ is a real number in the interval (−λ*c) then there is an FPTAS for approximating ZG(λ) on graphs G with maximum degree at most Δ. On the other hand, if λ is a real number outside of the (closed) interval, then approximation is NP-hard. The key to establishing this picture was the interpretation of the thresholds λ* and λc on the Δ-regular tree. The ”occupation ratio” of a Δ-regular tree T is the contribution to ZT(λ) from independent sets containing the root of the tree, divided by ZT(λ) itself. This occupation ratio converges to a limit, as the height of the tree grows, if and only if λ∈ [−λ*c].
Unsurprisingly, the case where λ is complex is more challenging. It is known that there is an FPTAS when λ is a complex number with norm at most λ* and also when λ is in a small strip surrounding the real interval [0,λc). However, neither of these results is believed to fully capture the truth about when approximation is possible. Peters and Regts identified the values of λ for which the occupation ratio of the Δ-regular tree converges. These values carve a cardioid-shaped region ΛΔ in the complex plane, whose boundary includes the critical points −λ* and λc. Motivated by the picture in the real case, they asked whether ΛΔ marks the true approximability threshold for general complex values λ.
Our main result shows that for every λ outside of ΛΔ, the problem of approximating ZG(λ) on graphs G with maximum degree at most Δ is indeed NP-hard. In fact, when λ is outside of ΛΔ and is not a positive real number, we give the stronger result that approximating ZG(λ) is actually #P-hard. Further, on the negative real axis, when λ<−λ*, we show that it is #P-hard to even decide whether ZG(λ)>0, resolving in the affirmative a conjecture of Harvey, Srivastava and Vondrak.
Our proof techniques are based around tools from complex analysis — specifically the study of iterative multivariate rational maps.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (8b-2.mp4)

References

[1]
A. F. Beardon. 1991.
[2]
Iteration of rational functions: complex analytic dynamical systems. Springer-Verlag.
[3]
Maria Chudnovsky and Paul D. Seymour. 2007. The roots of the independence polynomial of a clawfree graph. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 97, 3 (2007), 350–357.
[4]
Andreas Galanis, Leslie Ann Goldberg, and Daniel Štefankovič. 2017. Inapproximability of the Independent Set Polynomial Below the Shearer Threshold. In 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2017, July 10-14, 2017, Warsaw, Poland. 28:1–28:13. ICALP.2017.28
[5]
Leslie Ann Goldberg and Heng Guo. 2017. The Complexity of Approximating complex-valued Ising and Tutte partition functions. Computational Complexity 26, 4 (2017), 765–833. 017- 0162- 2
[6]
Nicholas J. A. Harvey, Piyush Srivastava, and Jan Vondrák. 2018.
[7]
Computing the Independence Polynomial: from the Tree Threshold down to the Roots. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA, January 7-10, 2018. 1557–1576.
[8]
J. W. Milnor. 2006.
[9]
Dynamics in One Complex Variable. Number v. 10 in Academic Search Complete. Princeton University Press.
[10]
Viresh Patel and Guus Regts. 2017. Deterministic Polynomial-Time Approximation Algorithms for Partition Functions and Graph Polynomials. SIAM J. Comput. 46, 6 (2017), 1893–1919.
[11]
Han Peters and Guus Regts. 2017. On a conjecture of Sokal concerning roots of the independence polynomial. CoRR abs/1701.08049 (2017). arXiv: 1701.08049
[12]
Alexander D. Scott and Alan D. Sokal. 2005.
[13]
The repulsive lattice gas, the independent-set polynomial, and the Lovász local lemma. J. Stat. Phys. 118, 5-6 (2005), 1151–1261.
[14]
004- 2055- 4
[15]
Allan Sly and Nike Sun. 2014. Counting in two-spin models on d-regular graphs. Ann. Probab. 42, 6 (11 2014), 2383–2416.
[16]
Leslie G. Valiant and Vijay V. Vazirani. 1986. NP is as Easy as Detecting Unique Solutions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 47, 3 (1986), 85–93. 0304- 3975(86)90135- 0
[17]
Dror Weitz. 2006.
[18]
Counting Independent Sets Up to the Tree Threshold. In Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 140–149.
[19]
[20]
Abraham Ziv. 1982.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Implementations and the independent set polynomial below the Shearer thresholdTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2022.10.025Online publication date: Oct-2022
  • (2021)Lee-yang zeros and the complexity of the ferromagnetic ising model on bounded-degree graphsProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3458064.3458155(1508-1519)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Cayley Trees do Not Determine the Maximal Zero-Free Locus of the Independence PolynomialMichigan Mathematical Journal10.1307/mmj/1599206419-1:-1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Inapproximability of the independent set polynomial in the complex plane

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    STOC 2018: Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 2018
    1332 pages
    ISBN:9781450355599
    DOI:10.1145/3188745
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. #P-hardness
    2. inapproximability
    3. independent set polynomial

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    STOC '18
    Sponsor:
    STOC '18: Symposium on Theory of Computing
    June 25 - 29, 2018
    CA, Los Angeles, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

    Upcoming Conference

    STOC '25
    57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)
    June 23 - 27, 2025
    Prague , Czech Republic

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Implementations and the independent set polynomial below the Shearer thresholdTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2022.10.025Online publication date: Oct-2022
    • (2021)Lee-yang zeros and the complexity of the ferromagnetic ising model on bounded-degree graphsProceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms10.5555/3458064.3458155(1508-1519)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2021
    • (2021)Cayley Trees do Not Determine the Maximal Zero-Free Locus of the Independence PolynomialMichigan Mathematical Journal10.1307/mmj/1599206419-1:-1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2020)Holant Clones and the Approximability of Conservative Holant ProblemsACM Transactions on Algorithms10.1145/338142516:2(1-55)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2020
    • (2020)The complexity of approximating averages on bounded-degree graphs2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00127(1345-1355)Online publication date: Dec-2020
    • (2019)On a Conjecture of Sokal Concerning Roots of the Independence PolynomialMichigan Mathematical Journal10.1307/mmj/154166762668:1Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019
    • (2019)Algorithmic Pirogov–Sinai theoryProbability Theory and Related Fields10.1007/s00440-019-00928-yOnline publication date: 26-Jun-2019

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media