Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Learned feature embeddings for non-line-of-sight imaging and recognition

Published: 27 November 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Objects obscured by occluders are considered lost in the images acquired by conventional camera systems, prohibiting both visualization and understanding of such hidden objects. Non-line-of-sight methods (NLOS) aim at recovering information about hidden scenes, which could help make medical imaging less invasive, improve the safety of autonomous vehicles, and potentially enable capturing unprecedented high-definition RGB-D data sets that include geometry beyond the directly visible parts. Recent NLOS methods have demonstrated scene recovery from time-resolved pulse-illuminated measurements encoding occluded objects as faint indirect reflections. Unfortunately, these systems are fundamentally limited by the quartic intensity fall-off for diffuse scenes. With laser illumination limited by eye-safety limits, recovery algorithms must tackle this challenge by incorporating scene priors. However, existing NLOS reconstruction algorithms do not facilitate learning scene priors. Even if they did, datasets that allow for such supervision do not exist, and successful encoder-decoder networks and generative adversarial networks fail for real-world NLOS data. In this work, we close this gap by learning hidden scene feature representations tailored to both reconstruction and recognition tasks such as classification or object detection, while still relying on physical models at the feature level. We overcome the lack of real training data with a generalizable architecture that can be trained in simulation. We learn the differentiable scene representation jointly with the reconstruction task using a differentiable transient renderer in the objective, and demonstrate that it generalizes to unseen classes and unseen real-world scenes, unlike existing encoder-decoder architectures and generative adversarial networks. The proposed method allows for end-to-end training for different NLOS tasks, such as image reconstruction, classification, and object detection, while being memory-efficient and running at real-time rates. We demonstrate hidden view synthesis, RGB-D reconstruction, classification, and object detection in the hidden scene in an end-to-end fashion.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (a230-chen.zip)
Supplemental material.
MP4 File (3414685.3417825.mp4)
Presentation video

References

[1]
Nils Abramson. 1978. Light-in-flight recording by holography. Optics Letters 3, 4 (1978), 121--123.
[2]
Victor Arellano, Diego Gutierrez, and Adrian Jarabo. 2017. Fast back-projection for non-line of sight reconstruction. Optics Express 25, 10 (2017), 11574--11583.
[3]
Katherine L Bouman, Vickie Ye, Adam B Yedidia, Frédo Durand, Gregory W Wornell, Antonio Torralba, and William T Freeman. 2017. Turning corners into cameras: Principles and methods. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 2289--2297.
[4]
Samuel Burri. 2016. Challenges and Solutions to Next-Generation Single-Photon Imagers. Technical Report. EPFL.
[5]
Mauro Buttafava, Jessica Zeman, Alberto Tosi, Kevin Eliceiri, and Andreas Velten. 2015. Non-line-of-sight imaging using a time-gated single photon avalanche diode. Optics express 23, 16 (2015), 20997--21011.
[6]
Piergiorgio Caramazza, Alessandro Boccolini, Daniel Buschek, Matthias Hullin, Catherine F Higham, Robert Henderson, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Daniele Faccio. 2018a. Neural network identification of people hidden from view with a single-pixel, single-photon detector. Scientific reports 8, 1 (2018), 11945.
[7]
Piergiorgio Caramazza, Alessandro Boccolini, Daniel Buschek, Matthias Hullin, Catherine F Higham, Robert Henderson, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Daniele Faccio. 2018b. Neural network identification of people hidden from view with a single-pixel, single-photon detector. Scientific Reports 8, 1 (2018), 11945.
[8]
Susan Chan, Ryan E Warburton, Genevieve Gariepy, Jonathan Leach, and Daniele Faccio. 2017. Non-line-of-sight tracking of people at long range. Optics express 25, 9 (2017), 10109--10117.
[9]
Angel X. Chang, Thomas Funkhouser, Leonidas Guibas, Pat Hanrahan, Qixing Huang, Zimo Li, Silvio Savarese, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Hao Su, Jianxiong Xiao, Li Yi, and Fisher Yu. 2015. ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository. Technical Report arXiv:1512.03012 [cs.GR]. Stanford University --- Princeton University --- Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago.
[10]
Wenzheng Chen, Simon Daneau, Fahim Mannan, and Felix Heide. 2019. Steady-state non-line-of-sight imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6790--6799.
[11]
Javier Grau Chopite, Matthias B. Hullin, Michael Wand, and Julian Iseringhausen. 2020. Deep Non-Line-of-Sight Reconstruction. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[12]
Christopher B Choy, Danfei Xu, JunYoung Gwak, Kevin Chen, and Silvio Savarese. 2016. 3d-r2n2: A unified approach for single and multi-view 3d object reconstruction. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 628--644.
[13]
Özgün Çiçek, Ahmed Abdulkadir, Soeren S Lienkamp, Thomas Brox, and Olaf Ronneberger. 2016. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In International conference on medical image computing and computerassisted intervention. Springer, 424--432.
[14]
PB Coates. 1972. Pile-up corrections in the measurement of lifetimes. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments 5, 2 (1972), 148.
[15]
Michael F Cohen and Donald P Greenberg. 1985. The hemi-cube: A radiosity solution for complex environments. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics 19, 3 (1985), 31--40.
[16]
Qi Guo, Iuri Frosio, Orazio Gallo, Todd Zickler, and Jan Kautz. 2018. Tackling 3d tof artifacts through learning and the flat dataset. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 368--383.
[17]
Otkrist Gupta, Thomas Willwacher, Andreas Velten, Ashok Veeraraghavan, and Ramesh Raskar. 2012. Reconstruction of hidden 3D shapes using diffuse reflections. Opt. Express 20, 17 (Aug 2012), 19096--19108.
[18]
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.
[19]
Felix Heide, Steven Diamond, David B Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2018. Subpicosecond photon-efficient 3D imaging using single-photon sensors. Scientific reports 8, 1 (2018), 17726.
[20]
Felix Heide, Matthias B Hullin, James Gregson, and Wolfgang Heidrich. 2013. Low-budget transient imaging using photonic mixer devices. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 32, 4 (2013), 1--10.
[21]
Felix Heide, Matthew O'Toole, Kai Zang, David B Lindell, Steven Diamond, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2019. Non-line-of-sight imaging with partial occluders and surface normals. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 38, 3 (2019), 22.
[22]
Felix Heide, Lei Xiao, Wolfgang Heidrich, and Matthias B Hullin. 2014. Diffuse mirrors: 3D reconstruction from diffuse indirect illumination using inexpensive time-of-flight sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3222--3229.
[23]
Quercus Hernandez, Diego Gutierrez, and Adrian Jarabo. 2017. A Computational Model of a Single-Photon Avalanche Diode Sensor for Transient Imaging. arXiv:physics.insdet/1703.02635
[24]
Julian Iseringhausen and Matthias B Hullin. 2020. Non-line-of-sight reconstruction using efficient transient rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 39, 1 (2020), 1--14.
[25]
Max Jaderberg, Karen Simonyan, Andrew Zisserman, et al. 2015. Spatial transformer networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2017--2025.
[26]
Adrian Jarabo and Victor Arellano. 2018. Bidirectional rendering of vector light transport. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 37. Wiley Online Library, 96--105.
[27]
Adrian Jarabo, Julio Marco, Adolfo Munoz, Raul Buisan, Wojciech Jarosz, and Diego Gutierrez. 2014. A Framework for Transient Rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia) 33, 6 (nov 2014).
[28]
Adrian Jarabo, Belen Masia, Julio Marco, and Diego Gutierrez. 2017. Recent advances in transient imaging: A computer graphics and vision perspective. Visual Informatics 1, 1 (2017), 65--79.
[29]
Achuta Kadambi, Refael Whyte, Ayush Bhandari, Lee Streeter, Christopher Barsi, Adrian Dorrington, and Ramesh Raskar. 2013. Coded time of flight cameras: sparse deconvolution to address multipath interference and recover time profiles. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 32, 6 (2013), 167.
[30]
Achuta Kadambi, Hang Zhao, Boxin Shi, and Ramesh Raskar. 2016. Occluded imaging with time-of-flight sensors. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 35, 2 (2016), 15.
[31]
Ori Katz, Pierre Heidmann, Mathias Fink, and Sylvain Gigan. 2014. Non-invasive singleshot imaging through scattering layers and around corners via speckle correlations. Nature photonics 8, 10 (2014), 784.
[32]
Ori Katz, Eran Small, and Yaron Silberberg. 2012. Looking around corners and through thin turbid layers in real time with scattered incoherent light. Nature photonics 6, 8 (2012), 549--553.
[33]
A. Kirmani, T. Hutchison, J. Davis, and R. Raskar. 2009. Looking around the corner using transient imaging. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 159--166.
[34]
Ahmed Kirmani, Dheera Venkatraman, Dongeek Shin, Andrea Colaço, Franco NC Wong, Jeffrey H Shapiro, and Vivek K Goyal. 2014. First-photon imaging. Science 343, 6166 (2014), 58--61.
[35]
Jonathan Klein, Christoph Peters, Jaime Martín, Martin Laurenzis, and Matthias B Hullin. 2016. Tracking objects outside the line of sight using 2D intensity images. Scientific reports 6 (2016), 32491.
[36]
Martin Laurenzis and Andreas Velten. 2014. Feature selection and back-projection algorithms for nonline-of-sight laser-gated viewing. Journal of Electronic Imaging 23, 6 (2014), 063003.
[37]
David B Lindell, Gordon Wetzstein, and Vladlen Koltun. 2019a. Acoustic non-line-of-sight imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6780--6789.
[38]
David B. Lindell, Gordon Wetzstein, and Matthew O'Toole. 2019b. Wave-based non-line-of-sight imaging using fast f-k migration. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH) 38, 4 (2019), 116.
[39]
Xiaochun Liu, Sebastian Bauer, and Andreas Velten. 2020. Phasor field diffraction based reconstruction for fast non-line-of-sight imaging systems. Nature Communications 11 (2020).
[40]
Xiaochun Liu, Ibón Guillén, Marco La Manna, Ji Hyun Nam, Syed Azer Reza, Toan Huu Le, Adrian Jarabo, Diego Gutierrez, and Andreas Velten. 2019. Non-line-of-sight imaging using phasor-field virtual wave optics. Nature (2019), 1--4.
[41]
Stephen Lombardi, Tomas Simon, Jason Saragih, Gabriel Schwartz, Andreas Lehrmann, and Yaser Sheikh. 2019. Neural Volumes: Learning Dynamic Renderable Volumes from Images. ACM Trans. Graph. 38, 4, Article 65 (July 2019), 14 pages.
[42]
Julio Marco, Quercus Hernandez, Adolfo Muñoz, Yue Dong, Adrian Jarabo, Min H Kim, Xin Tong, and Diego Gutierrez. 2017. DeepToF: off-the-shelf real-time correction of multipath interference in time-of-flight imaging. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 36, 6 (2017), 1--12.
[43]
Christopher A. Metzler, Felix Heide, Prasana Rangarajan, Muralidhar Madabhushi Balaji, Aparna Viswanath, Ashok Veeraraghavan, and Richard G. Baraniuk. 2020. Deep-inverse correlography: towards real-time high-resolution non-line-of-sight imaging. Optica 7, 1 (Jan 2020), 63--71.
[44]
Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. 2020. NeRF: Representing Scenes as Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis. arXiv:cs.CV/2003.08934
[45]
N. Naik, S. Zhao, A. Velten, R. Raskar, and K. Bala. 2011. Single view reflectance capture using multiplexed scattering and time-of-flight imaging. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 6 (2011), 171.
[46]
Frédéric Nolet, Samuel Parent, Nicolas Roy, Marc-Olivier Mercier, Serge Charlebois, Réjean Fontaine, and Jean-Francois Pratte. 2018. Quenching Circuit and SPAD Integrated in CMOS 65 nm with 7.8 ps FWHM Single Photon Timing Resolution. Instruments 2, 4 (2018), 19.
[47]
Kyle Olszewski, Sergey Tulyakov, Oliver Woodford, Hao Li, and Linjie Luo. 2019. Transformable Bottleneck Networks. The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (Nov 2019).
[48]
Matthew O'Toole, David B Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2018a. Confocal non-line-of-sight imaging based on the light-cone transform. Nature 555, 7696 (2018), 338.
[49]
Matthew O'Toole, David B. Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2018b. Confocal Non-line-of-sight imaging based on the light cone transform. Nature (2018), 338--341. Issue 555.
[50]
R. Pandharkar, A. Velten, A. Bardagjy, E. Lawson, M. Bawendi, and R. Raskar. 2011. Estimating motion and size of moving non-line-of-sight objects in cluttered environments. In Proc. CVPR. 265--272.
[51]
Luca Parmesan, Neale AW Dutton, Neil J Calder, Andrew J Holmes, Lindsay A Grant, and Robert K Henderson. 2014. A 9.8 μm sample and hold time to amplitude converter CMOS SPAD pixel. In Solid State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), 2014 44th European. IEEE, 290--293.
[52]
Adithya Pediredla, Ashok Veeraraghavan, and Ioannis Gkioulekas. 2019. Ellipsoidal Path Connections for Time-gated Rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. (SIGGRAPH) (2019).
[53]
Adithya Kumar Pediredla, Mauro Buttafava, Alberto Tosi, Oliver Cossairt, and Ashok Veeraraghavan. 2017. Reconstructing rooms using photon echoes: A plane based model and reconstruction algorithm for looking around the corner. In IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP). IEEE.
[54]
Stephan R Richter and Stefan Roth. 2018. Matryoshka networks: Predicting 3d geometry via nested shape layers. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1936--1944.
[55]
Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, 234--241.
[56]
Charles Saunders, John Murray-Bruce, and Vivek K Goyal. 2019. Computational periscopy with an ordinary digital camera. Nature 565, 7740 (2019), 472.
[57]
Nicolas Scheiner, Florian Kraus, Fangyin Wei, Buu Phan, Fahim Mannan, Nils Appenrodt, Werner Ritter, Jurgen Dickmann, Klaus Dietmayer, Bernhard Sick, et al. 2020. Seeing Around Street Corners: Non-Line-of-Sight Detection and Tracking In-the-Wild Using Doppler Radar. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2068--2077.
[58]
Vincent Sitzmann, Justus Thies, Felix Heide, Matthias Niessner, Gordon Wetzstein, and Michael Zollhöfer. 2019a. DeepVoxels: Learning Persistent 3D Feature Embeddings. In Proc. CVPR.
[59]
Vincent Sitzmann, Michael Zollhöfer, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2019b. Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
[60]
Robert H Stolt. 1978. Migration by Fourier transform. Geophysics 43, 1 (1978), 23--48.
[61]
Shuochen Su, Felix Heide, Gordon Wetzstein, and Wolfgang Heidrich. 2018. Deep end-to-end time-of-flight imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6383--6392.
[62]
Matthew Tancik, Guy Satat, and Ramesh Raskar. 2018. Flash Photography for Data-Driven Hidden Scene Recovery. CoRR abs/1810.11710 (2018). arXiv:1810.11710 http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11710
[63]
Maxim Tatarchenko, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Brox. 2015. Single-view to Multi-view: Reconstructing Unseen Views with a Convolutional Network. CoRR abs/1511.06702 (2015). arXiv:1511.06702 http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06702
[64]
Chia-Yin Tsai, Kiriakos N Kutulakos, Srinivasa G Narasimhan, and Aswin C Sankaranarayanan. 2017. The geometry of first-returning photons for non-line-of-sight imaging. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[65]
Chia-Yin Tsai, Aswin C Sankaranarayanan, and Ioannis Gkioulekas. 2019. Beyond Volumetric Albedo-A Surface Optimization Framework for Non-Line-Of-Sight Imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1545--1555.
[66]
A. Velten, T. Willwacher, O. Gupta, A. Veeraraghavan, M.G. Bawendi, and R. Raskar. 2012. Recovering three-dimensional shape around a corner using ultrafast time-of-flight imaging. Nature Communications 3 (2012), 745.
[67]
A. Velten, D. Wu, A. Jarabo, B. Masia, C. Barsi, C. Joshi, E. Lawson, M. Bawendi, D. Gutierrez, and R. Raskar. 2013. Femto-Photography: Capturing and Visualizing the Propagation of Light. ACM Trans. Graph. 32 (2013).
[68]
Xiaolong Wang, Ross Girshick, Abhinav Gupta, and Kaiming He. 2018. Non-local neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 7794--7803.
[69]
D. Wu, M. O'Toole, A. Velten, A. Agrawal, and R. Raskar. 2012. Decomposing global light transport using time of flight imaging. In Proc. CVPR. 366--373.
[70]
Zhirong Wu, Shuran Song, Aditya Khosla, Fisher Yu, Linguang Zhang, Xiaoou Tang, and Jianxiong Xiao. 2015. 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1912--1920.
[71]
Feihu Xu, Gal Shulkind, Christos Thrampoulidis, Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Antonio Torralba, Franco N. C. Wong, and Gregory W. Wornell. 2018. Revealing hidden scenes by photon-efficient occlusion-based opportunistic active imaging. OSA Opt. Express 26, 8 (2018), 9945--9962.
[72]
Tinghui Zhou, Shubham Tulsiani, Weilun Sun, Jitendra Malik, and Alexei A. Efros. 2016. View Synthesis by Appearance Flow. CoRR abs/1605.03557 (2016). arXiv:1605.03557 http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.03557

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Passive Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging With Light Transport ModulationIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2024.351809734(410-424)Online publication date: 2025
  • (2024)High-resolution non-confocal non-line-of-sight imaging based on spherical-slice transform from spatial and temporal frequency to space and timeOptics Letters10.1364/OL.52830049:13(3806)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Plug-and-Play Algorithms for Dynamic Non-line-of-sight ImagingACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3665139Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Learned feature embeddings for non-line-of-sight imaging and recognition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
    ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 39, Issue 6
    December 2020
    1605 pages
    ISSN:0730-0301
    EISSN:1557-7368
    DOI:10.1145/3414685
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 November 2020
    Published in TOG Volume 39, Issue 6

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. computational photography
    2. deep learning
    3. differentiable physics
    4. non-line-of-sight imaging
    5. time-of-flight imaging

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • U. S. National Science Foundation

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)148
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Passive Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging With Light Transport ModulationIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2024.351809734(410-424)Online publication date: 2025
    • (2024)High-resolution non-confocal non-line-of-sight imaging based on spherical-slice transform from spatial and temporal frequency to space and timeOptics Letters10.1364/OL.52830049:13(3806)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Plug-and-Play Algorithms for Dynamic Non-line-of-sight ImagingACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/3665139Online publication date: 14-May-2024
    • (2024)Learning-based Spotlight Position Optimization for Non-Line-of-Sight Human Localization and Posture Classification2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)10.1109/WACV57701.2024.00417(4206-4215)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Curvature Regularization for Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging From Under-Sampled DataIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2024.340941446:12(8474-8485)Online publication date: Dec-2024
    • (2024)Shadow Based Non-Line-of-Sight Pedestrian Rushing Detection for Automated DrivingIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2024.344790723:12(14754-14767)Online publication date: Dec-2024
    • (2024)Fast Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging With Hybrid Super-Resolution Network Over 18 mIEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging10.1109/TCI.2024.346396410(1439-1448)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Model-guided Iterative Diffusion Sampling for NLOS ReconstructionIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics10.1109/JSTQE.2024.3350971(1-11)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Event-Enhanced Passive Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging for Moving Objects With Physical EmbeddingIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2024.346890924:22(37970-37985)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Non-Line-of-Sight Target Tracking With a Single Time Multiplexed ChannelIEEE Photonics Journal10.1109/JPHOT.2024.347107016:6(1-6)Online publication date: Dec-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media