Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Protection or Punishment? Relating the Design Space of Parental Control Apps and Perceptions about Them to Support Parenting for Online Safety

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Parental control apps, which are mobile apps that allow parents to monitor and restrict their children's activities online, are becoming increasingly adopted by parents as a means of safeguarding their children's online safety. However, it is not clear whether these apps are always beneficial or effective in what they aim to do; for instance, the overuse of restriction and surveillance has been found to undermine parent-child relationship and children's sense of autonomy. While previous research has categorised and taken inventory of key features of popular parental control apps, they have not systematically analysed the ways such features were designed or realised in such apps, or in particular how aspects of such designs might relate to parents and children's experiences with such apps. In this work, we investigate this gap, asking specifically: how might children's and parents' perceptions be related to how parental control features were designed? To investigate this question, we conducted an analysis of 58 top Android parental control apps designed for the purpose of promoting children's online safety, finding three major axes of variation in how key restriction and monitoring features were realised: granularity, feedback/transparency, and parent-child communications support. To relate these axes to perceived benefits and problems, we then analysed 3264 app reviews to identify references to aspects of the each of the axes above, to understand children's and parents' views of how such dimensions related to their experiences with these apps. Our findings led towards 1) an understanding of how parental control apps realise their functionalities differently along three axes of variation, 2) an analysis of exactly the ways that such variation influences children's and parents' perceptions, respectively of the usefulness or effectiveness of these apps, and finally 3) an identification of design recommendations and opportunities for future apps by contextualising our findings within existing digital parenting theories.

References

[1]
2019. Global Parental Control Software Market Research Report. (2019). https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/parental-control-software-market-4551
[2]
2020. google-play-scraper 0.1.1. (2020).
[3]
5Rights. 2018. Disrupted Childhood: The Cost of Persuasive Design. https://5rightsframework.com/static/5Rights-Disrupted-Childhood.pdf
[4]
Turki Alelyani, Arup Kumar Ghosh, Larry Moralez, Shion Guha, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2019. Examining Parent Versus Child Reviews of Parental Control Apps on Google Play. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 3--21.
[5]
Moondore Ali, Mark Blades, Caroline Oates, and Fran Blumberg. 2009. Young children's ability to recognize advertisements in web page designs. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 27, 1 (2009), 71--83.
[6]
Jeffrey Jensen Arnett. 2000. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American psychologist, Vol. 55, 5 (2000), 469.
[7]
Albert Bandura. [n.d.]. Social learning theory. Vol. 1.
[8]
Ine Beyens and Kathleen Beullens. 2017. Parent--child conflict about children's tablet use: The role of parental mediation. New Media & Society, Vol. 19, 12 (2017), 2075--2093.
[9]
Maximilian B Bibok, Jeremy IM Carpendale, and Ulrich Müller. 2009. Parental scaffolding and the development of executive function. New directions for child and adolescent development, Vol. 2009, 123 (2009), 17--34.
[10]
Steven Bird, Ewan Klein, and Edward Loper. 2009. Natural language processing with Python: analyzing text with the natural language toolkit ." O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
[11]
Thuy Dinh Brian O'Neill. 2018. The Better Internet for Kids Policy Map. https://www.betterinternetforkids.eu/documents/167024/2637346/BIK+Map+report+-+Final+-+March+2018/a858ae53--971f-4dce-829c-5a02af9287f7
[12]
Rowena Briones, Stephanie Madden, and Melissa Janoske. 2013. Kony 2012: Invisible children and the challenges of social media campaigning and digital activism. Journal of Current Issues in Media and Telecommunications ISSN, Vol. 1935 (2013), 3588.
[13]
Seth Chaiklin et al. 2003. The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context, Vol. 1, 2 (2003), 39--64.
[14]
Vivian Hsueh Hua Chen and Grace S Chng. 2016. Active and restrictive parental mediation over time: Effects on youths' self-regulatory competencies and impulsivity. Computers & Education, Vol. 98 (2016), 206--212.
[15]
Lynn Schofield Clark. 2011. Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication theory, Vol. 21, 4 (2011), 323--343.
[16]
Kevin M Collier, Sarah M Coyne, Eric E Rasmussen, Alan J Hawkins, Laura M Padilla-Walker, Sage E Erickson, and Madison K Memmott-Elison. 2016. Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental psychology, Vol. 52, 5 (2016), 798.
[17]
Nancy Darling. 1999. Parenting style and its correlates .ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education, University ?.
[18]
Andrea Duerager and Sonia Livingstone. 2012. How can parents support children's internet safety? (2012).
[19]
Álvaro Feal, Paolo Calciati, Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez, Carmela Troncoso, and Alessandra Gorla. 2020. Angel or Devil? A Privacy Study of Mobile Parental Control Apps. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Vol. 2020, 2 (2020), 314--335.
[20]
Karin M Fikkers, Jessica Taylor Piotrowski, and Patti M Valkenburg. 2017. A matter of style? Exploring the effects of parental mediation styles on early adolescents' media violence exposure and aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 70 (2017), 407--415.
[21]
Karen L Fingerman, Cynthia Berg, Jacqui Smith, and Toni C Antonucci. 2011. Handbook of life-span development .Springer Publishing Company.
[22]
Denyce S Ford, Kay K Massey, and David Hyde. 1985. Factors related to authoritarian versus nonauthoritarian attitudes toward parenting among college students. Health Education, Vol. 16, 6 (1985), 26--28.
[23]
Arup Kumar Ghosh, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Shion Guha, Joseph J LaViola Jr, and Pamela J Wisniewski. 2018a. Safety vs. surveillance: what children have to say about mobile apps for parental control. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[24]
Arup Kumar Ghosh, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Mary Beth Rosson, Heng Xu, John M. Carroll, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2018b. A Matter of Control or Safety? Examining Parental Use of Technical Monitoring Apps on Teens' Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173768
[25]
Arup Kumar Ghosh, Charles E Hughes, and Pamela J Wisniewski. 2020. Circle of Trust: A New Approach to Mobile Online Safety for Families. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[26]
HM Government. 2019. Online Harms White Paper.
[27]
Emitza Guzman and Walid Maalej. 2014. How do users like this feature? a fine grained sentiment analysis of app reviews. In 2014 IEEE 22nd international requirements engineering conference (RE). IEEE, 153--162.
[28]
Leslie Haddon. 2015. Children's critical evaluation of parental mediation. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, Vol. 9, 1 (2015), 2.
[29]
Stuart I Hammond, Ulrich Müller, Jeremy IM Carpendale, Maximilian B Bibok, and Dana P Liebermann-Finestone. 2012. The effects of parental scaffolding on preschoolers' executive function. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 48, 1 (2012), 271.
[30]
Machackova Hana and Blaya Catherine. 2020. Children's experiences with cyberhate. https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/assets/documents/research/eu-kids-online/reports
[31]
Yasmeen Hashish, Andrea Bunt, and James E Young. 2014. Involving children in content control: a collaborative and education-oriented content filtering approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1797--1806.
[32]
Beeban Kidron and Angharad Rudkin. 2017. Digital Childhood: Addressing childhood development milestones in the digital environment. (2017).
[33]
Minsam Ko, Seungwoo Choi, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, and Uichin Lee. 2015. FamiLync: facilitating participatory parental mediation of adolescents' smartphone use. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 867--878.
[34]
Claire B Kopp. 1982. Antecedents of self-regulation: a developmental perspective. Developmental psychology, Vol. 18, 2 (1982), 199.
[35]
Priya Kumar, Shalmali Milind Naik, Utkarsha Ramesh Devkar, Marshini Chetty, Tamara L Clegg, and Jessica Vitak. 2017. 'No Telling Passcodes Out Because They're Private' Understanding Children's Mental Models of Privacy and Security Online. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--21.
[36]
Sofie Kuppens and Eva Ceulemans. 2019. Parenting styles: A closer look at a well-known concept. Journal of child and family studies, Vol. 28, 1 (2019), 168--181.
[37]
Charlotte P Lee. 2007. Boundary negotiating artifacts: Unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 16, 3 (2007), 307--339.
[38]
Sook-Jung Lee and Young-Gil Chae. 2007. Children's Internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology & behavior, Vol. 10, 5 (2007), 640--644.
[39]
Clayton Lewis and Cathleen Wharton. 1997. Cognitive walkthroughs. In Handbook of human-computer interaction. Elsevier, 717--732.
[40]
Ben Light, Jean Burgess, and Stefanie Duguay. 2018. The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New media & society, Vol. 20, 3 (2018), 881--900.
[41]
Sonia Livingstone, Leslie Haddon, Anke Görzig, and Kjartan Ólafsson. 2011. Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9--16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. (2011).
[42]
Sonia Livingstone and Ellen J Helsper. 2008. Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, Vol. 52, 4 (2008), 581--599.
[43]
Giovanna Mascheroni, Sonia Livingstone, and Elisabeth Staksrud. 2015. Developing a framework for researching children's online risks and opportunities in Europe. (12 2015).
[44]
Anneleen Meeus, Ine Beyens, Femke Geusens, An Katrien Sodermans, and Kathleen Beullens. 2018. Managing positive and negative media effects among adolescents: Parental mediation matters-But not always. Journal of Family Communication, Vol. 18, 4 (2018), 270--285.
[45]
Monica Konnie Mensah and Alfred Kuranchie. 2013. Influence of parenting styles on the social development of children. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 2, 3 (2013), 123--123.
[46]
Gustavo S Mesch. 2009. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 12, 4 (2009), 387--393.
[47]
George A Miller. 1995. WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM, Vol. 38, 11 (1995), 39--41.
[48]
Kristin L Moilanen, Katie E Rasmussen, and Laura M Padilla-Walker. 2015. Bidirectional associations between self-regulation and parenting styles in early adolescence. Journal of research on adolescence, Vol. 25, 2 (2015), 246--262.
[49]
Stefanie Mollborn and Paula Fomby. 2020. Making Sense of Kids' Technology Use. (2020).
[50]
Amy I Nathanson. 1999. Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children's aggression. Communication Research, Vol. 26, 2 (1999), 124--143.
[51]
Amy I Nathanson. 2013. Media and the family context. In The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media. Routledge, 325--332.
[52]
Peter Nikken and Jeroen Jansz. 2014. Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and technology, Vol. 39, 2 (2014), 250--266.
[53]
Ofcom. 2019. Why children spend time online. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/media-releases/2019/why-children-spend-time-online
[54]
Ofcom.org. [n.d.] a. children and parents: media use and attitudes report 2019. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/190616/children-media-use-attitudes-2019-report.pdf
[55]
Ofcom.org. [n.d.] b. Ofcom Children's Media Lives: Life in Lockdown. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/200976/cml-life-in-lockdown-report.pdf
[56]
ofcom.org. 2016. Children and parents: media use and attitude report. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-parents-nov16
[57]
ofcom.org. 2017. Children and parents: media use and attitude report. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/108182/children-parents-media-use-attitudes-2017.pdf
[58]
David J Paulsen, Michael L Platt, Scott A Huettel, and Elizabeth M Brannon. 2012. From risk-seeking to risk-averse: the development of economic risk preference from childhood to adulthood. Frontiers in psychology, Vol. 3 (2012), 313.
[59]
Karen J Pine and Avril Nash. 2002. Dear Santa: The effects of television advertising on young children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 26, 6 (2002), 529--539.
[60]
Anthony T Pinter, Pamela J Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and Jack M Caroll. 2017. Adolescent online safety: Moving beyond formative evaluations to designing solutions for the future. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 352--357.
[61]
Pew Research. 2020. Parenting Children in the Age of Screens. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/28/parenting-children-in-the-age-of-screens/
[62]
Fred D Reynolds and William R Darden. 1971. Mutually adaptive effects of interpersonal communication. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 8, 4 (1971), 449--454.
[63]
Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, Vol. 55, 1 (2000), 68.
[64]
Wonsun Shin and May O Lwin. 2017. How does ?talking about the Internet with others" affect teenagers' experience of online risks? The role of active mediation by parents, peers, and school teachers. New Media & Society, Vol. 19, 7 (2017), 1109--1126.
[65]
David Smahel, Hana MacHackova, Giovanna Mascheroni, Lenka Dedkova, Elisabeth Staksrud, Kjartan Olafsson, Sonia Livingstone, and Uwe Hasebrink. 2020. EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. (2020).
[66]
Livingstone Sonia and Davidson Julia. 2017. Children's online activities, risks and safety.
[67]
Harry Strub. 1989. The theory of panoptical control: Bentham's panopticon and Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 25, 1 (1989), 40--59.
[68]
Katrien Symons, Koen Ponnet, Kathleen Emmery, Michel Walrave, and Wannes Heirman. 2017. Parental knowledge of adolescents' online content and contact risks. Journal of youth and adolescence, Vol. 46, 2 (2017), 401--416.
[69]
Christine M Temple. 1997. Cognitive neuropsychology and its application to children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 38, 1 (1997), 27--52.
[70]
Unicef. 2020. Rethinking screen-time in the time of COVID-19. https://www.unicef.org/globalinsight/stories/rethinking-screen-time-time-covid-19
[71]
Patti M Valkenburg, Marina Krcmar, Allerd L Peeters, and Nies M Marseille. 1999. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation:?Instructive mediation,"?restrictive mediation," and ?social coviewing". Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, Vol. 43, 1 (1999), 52--66.
[72]
Patti M Valkenburg, Jessica Taylor Piotrowski, Jo Hermanns, and Rebecca De Leeuw. 2013. Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, Vol. 39, 4 (2013), 445--469.
[73]
Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. What concerns do Chinese parents have about their children's digital adoption and how to better support them? arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11123 (2019).
[74]
Barbara M Wildemuth. 2016. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science .ABC-CLIO.
[75]
Pamela Wisniewski, Arup Kumar Ghosh, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2017. Parental Control vs. Teen Self-Regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety?. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 51--69.
[76]
Pamela Wisniewski, Haiyan Jia, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2015. " Preventative" vs." Reactive" How Parental Mediation Influences Teens' Social Media Privacy Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 302--316.
[77]
Bieke Zaman and Marije Nouwen. 2016. Parental controls: advice for parents, researchers and industry. EU Kids Online (2016).
[78]
Jun Zhao, Ge Wang, Carys Dally, Petr Slovak, Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. I make up a silly name' Understanding Children's Perception of Privacy Risks Online. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Cyber Sex Crimes Targeting Children and Adolescents in South Korea: Incidents and Legal ChallengesSocial Sciences10.3390/socsci1311059613:11(596)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Preventive Interventions for Internet Addiction in Young Children: A Systematic Review. (Preprint)JMIR Mental Health10.2196/56896Online publication date: 6-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Digital Interventions for Combating Internet Addiction in Young Children: Qualitative Study of Parent and Therapist PerspectivesJMIR Pediatrics and Parenting10.2196/553647(e55364)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Protection or Punishment? Relating the Design Space of Parental Control Apps and Perceptions about Them to Support Parenting for Online Safety

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
        CSCW2
        October 2021
        5376 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3493286
        Issue’s Table of Contents
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 18 October 2021
        Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. children online safety
        2. mobile apps
        3. parental controls
        4. parental mediation

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)408
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)60
        Reflects downloads up to 23 Feb 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Cyber Sex Crimes Targeting Children and Adolescents in South Korea: Incidents and Legal ChallengesSocial Sciences10.3390/socsci1311059613:11(596)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2024
        • (2024)Preventive Interventions for Internet Addiction in Young Children: A Systematic Review. (Preprint)JMIR Mental Health10.2196/56896Online publication date: 6-Feb-2024
        • (2024)Digital Interventions for Combating Internet Addiction in Young Children: Qualitative Study of Parent and Therapist PerspectivesJMIR Pediatrics and Parenting10.2196/553647(e55364)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2024)F2Key: Dynamically Converting Your Face into a Private Key Based on COTS Headphones for Reliable Voice InteractionProceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services10.1145/3643832.3661860(127-140)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
        • (2024)UbiPhysioProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435528:1(1-27)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
        • (2024)EarSlideProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435158:1(1-29)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
        • (2024)HyperHARProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435118:1(1-29)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
        • (2024)AFaceProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435108:1(1-33)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
        • (2024)Evaluating the Use of Hypothetical 'Would You Rather' Scenarios to Discuss Privacy and Security Concepts with ChildrenProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410048:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2024)VesNet: A Vessel Network for Jointly Learning Route Pattern and Future TrajectoryACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/363937015:2(1-25)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        Full Access

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media