Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3501409.3501694acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseitceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Improved Tightly-Coupled Monocular Visual-Inertial Location Algorithm

Published: 31 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Both direct and optical flow visual odometers are based on a strong assumption that the gray scale is invariant. Because of this assumption, the system is sensitive to the luminosity change of the image. To solve this problem, this paper proposes monocular visual-inertial odometry exploiting both multilevel Oriented Fast and Rotated Brief (ORB) feature and tightly-coupled fusion strategy. The purpose of this method is to improve the speed and robustness of matching. Furthermore, it also can build a high-precision initialization map to ensure the successful initialization of the whole system and the smooth operation of the subsequent. This paper pre-integrates Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data and constructs constraints with visual reprojection to optimize the solution. The experiments evaluated on public datasets demonstrate the multilevel ORB feature and the IMU fusion make the algorithm more accurate than other excellent projects. Compared with OKVIS and VINS-Mono using the visual and inertial fusion, the algorithm also performs better in the accuracy of state estimation and system robustness.

References

[1]
Klein, G. and D. Murray. Parallel Tracking and Mapping for Small AR Workspaces. in 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 2007.
[2]
Forster, C., M. Pizzoli, and D. Scaramuzza. SVO: Fast semi-direct monocular visual odometry. in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2014.
[3]
Mur-Artal, R., J.M.M. Montiel, and J.D. Tardos, ORB-SLAM: A Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM System. Ieee Transactions on Robotics, 2015. 31(5): p. 1147--1163.
[4]
Engel, J., T. Schops, and D. Cremers, LSD-SLAM: Large-Scale Direct Monocular SLAM. Computer Vision - Eccv 2014, Pt Ii, 2014. 8690: p. 834--849.
[5]
Leutenegger, S., et al., Keyframe-based visual-inertial odometry using nonlinear optimization. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2015. 34(3): p. 314--334.
[6]
Qin, T., P. Li, and S. Shen, VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2018. 34(4): p. 1004--1020.
[7]
Rublee, E., et al. ORB: an efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 2011. Barcelona, SPAIN.
[8]
Forster, C., et al., IMU Preintegration on Manifold for Efficient Visual-Inertial Maximum-a-Posteriori Estimation. Robotics: Science and Systems Xi, 2015.
[9]
Lupton, T. and S. Sukkarieh, Visual-Inertial-Aided Navigation for High-Dynamic Motion in Built Environments Without Initial Conditions. Ieee Transactions on Robotics, 2012. 28(1): p. 61--76.
[10]
Shen, S., et al. Tightly-Coupled Monocular Visual-Inertial Fusion for Autonomous Flight of Rotorcraft MAVs. in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2015. Seattle, WA.
[11]
Burri, M., et al., The EuRoC micro aerial vehicle datasets. International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016. 35(10): p. 1157--1163.
[12]
Lynen, S., et al. A Robust and Modular Multi-Sensor Fusion Approach Applied to MAV Navigation. in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2013. Tokyo, JAPAN.
[13]
Weiss, S., et al. Real-time Onboard Visual-Inertial State Estimation and Self-Calibration of MAVs in Unknown Environments. in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2012. St Paul, MN.
[14]
Mourikis, A.I., S.I. Roumeliotis, and Ieee. A multi-state constraint Kalman filter for vision-aided inertial navigation. in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2007. Rome, ITALY.
[15]
Calonder, M., et al., BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features. Computer Vision-Eccv 2010, Pt Iv, 2010. 6314: p. 778--792.
[16]
S. Agarwal., et al., Ceres solver. Online. Available: http://ceres-solver.org.
[17]
Geiger, A., et al. Are we ready for Autonomous Driving? The KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite. in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2012. Providence, RI.
[18]
Sturm, J., et al. A Benchmark for the Evaluation of RGB-D SLAM Systems. in 25th IEEE\RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2012. Algarve, PORTUGAL.

Index Terms

  1. An Improved Tightly-Coupled Monocular Visual-Inertial Location Algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EITCE '21: Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering
    October 2021
    1723 pages
    ISBN:9781450384322
    DOI:10.1145/3501409
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 December 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ORB feature
    2. sensor fusion
    3. tightly-coupled
    4. visual-inertial odometry

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    EITCE 2021

    Acceptance Rates

    EITCE '21 Paper Acceptance Rate 294 of 531 submissions, 55%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 508 of 972 submissions, 52%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 55
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media