Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Comparison of the Wearable Mobile Laser Scanner (WMLS) with Other Point Cloud Data Collection Methods in Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Diokaisareia

Published: 06 December 2022 Publication History

Abstract

For the protection of cultural heritage, modern techniques have been used alongside traditional methods in recent years. In addition to two modern measurement techniques (Unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanner) that have been the subject of much research as a three-dimensional (3D) data collection technique for the documentation of cultural heritage, the Wearable Mobile Laser Scanner (WMLS) technique has also recently been included in the research. Especially in cultural heritage documentation, it is essential to obtain accurate and precise data as well as fast and high-quality data. This study includes the visual and statistical comparison of the WMLS measurement method, which enables fast data collection, working with the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithm, in terms of accuracy and precision. To assess the accuracy of the three measurement approaches, eighteen (18) checkpoints (ChP) considered absolute values were measured using total-station techniques. With these data, the root means square error (RMSE) of each point were determined according to all three measurement techniques, and the directional and statistical errors were calculated. As a result of this research, while the terrestrial laser scanner method with an RMSE of 0.8 cm provides the best value, the RMSE of 2.64 cm and 4.92 cm was calculated in unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry and WMLS methods, respectively. At the end of the study, theories and limitations were taken into consideration for all three approaches. It was observed that the obtained accuracy of all three provide the measurement principles of cultural heritage and that a modern measurement tool such as WMLS was a significant innovation.

References

[1]
A. D. Styliadis, D. G. Konstantinidou, and K. A. Tyxola. 2008. eCAD system design-applications in architecture. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 3, 2 (2008), 204–214.
[2]
Ali Ulvi. 2018. Analysis of the utility of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in volume calculation by using photogrammetric techniques. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 3, 2 (2018), 43–49. DOI:.
[3]
Nizar Polat. 2020. LIDAR derived 3D city modelling. The international archives of photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 44, (2021), 339–342.
[4]
Fabio Remondino and Sabry El-Hakim. 2006. Image-based 3D modelling: A review. The Photogrammetric Record 21, 115 (2006), 269–291.
[5]
Alper Akar. 2017. Evaluation of accuracy of dems obtained from UAV-point clouds for different topographical areas. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 2, 3 (2017), 110–117. DOI:
[6]
Raffaella Brumana, Daniela Oreni, Branka Cuca, Luigia Binda, Paola Condoleo, and Maurizio Triggiani. 2014. Strategy for ıntegrated surveying techniques finalized to ınterpretive models in a Byzantine church, Mesopotam, Albania. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 8, 6 (2014), 886–924. DOI:
[7]
Halil İbrahim Şenol and Yunus Kaya. 2019. İnternet tabanlı veri kullanımıyla yerleşim alanlarının modellenmesi: Çiftlikköy kampüsü örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi 1, 1 (2019), 11–16.
[8]
Emre Senkal, Gordana Kaplan, and Uğur Avdan. 2021. Accuracy assessment of digital surface models from unmanned aerial vehicles’ imagery on archaeological sites. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 6, 2 (2021), 81–89. DOI:
[9]
Yunus Kaya, Halil İbrahim Şenol, and Nizar Polat. 2021. Three-dimensional modeling and drawings of stone column motifs in Harran Ruins. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal 3, 2 (2021), 48–52.
[10]
Susana Lagüela, Iago Dorado, Manuel Gesto, Pedro Arias, Diego González-Aguilera, and Henrique Lorenzo. 2018. Behavior analysis of novel wearable indoor mapping system based on 3D-SLAM. Sensors 18, 3 (2018), 766.
[11]
Mustafa Zeybek. 2019. El-tipi LiDAR ölçme sistemleri ve 3B veri işleme. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi 1, 1 (2019), 10–15.
[12]
Aydan Yaman and Hacı Murat Yılmaz. 2017. The effect of object surface colors on terrestrıal laser scanners. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 2, 2 (2017), 68–74. DOI:
[13]
Erica Nocerino, Fabio Menna, Fabio Remondino, Isabella Toschi, and Pablo Rodríguez-Gonzálvez. 2017. Investigation of indoor and outdoor performance of two portable mobile mapping systems. SPIE 10332, Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIV, 103320I (26 June 2017); DOI:
[14]
Francesco Di Stefano, Stefano Chiappini, Alban Gorreja, Mattia Balestra, and Roberto Pierdicca. 2021. Mobile 3D scan LiDAR: A literature review. Geomatics, Natural Hazards, and Risk 12, 1 (2021), 2387–2429, DOI:
[15]
Halil İbrahim Şenol, Nizar Polat, Yunus Kaya, Abdulkadir Memduhoğlu, and Mustafa Ulukavak. 2021. Digital documentation of ancient stone carving in Şuayip City. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal 3, 1 (2021), 10–14.
[16]
Yunus Kaya, Nizar Polat, Halil İbrahim Şenol, Abdulkadir Memduhoğlu, and Mustafa Ulukavak. 2021. Arkeolojik kalıntıların belgelenmesinde yersel ve İHA fotogrametrisinin birlikte kullanımı. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi 3, 1 (2021), 9–14.
[17]
Fabio Remondino. 2011. Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sensing 3, 6 (2011), 1104–1138.
[18]
Francesco Di Stefano, Stefano Chiappini, Fabio Piccinini, and Roberto Pierdicca. 2020. Integration and assessment between 3D data from different geomatics techniques. Case study: The ancient urban walls of San Ginesio (Italy). International Workshop on R3 in Geomatics: Research, Results and Review (2020), 186–197. DOI:
[19]
Salvatore Barba, Andrea di Filippo, Marco Limongiello, and Barbara Messina. 2019. Integration of active sensors for geometric analysis of the Chapel of the Holy Shroud. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLII-2/W15 (2/W15), (2019), 149–156.
[20]
Grazia Tucci, Domenico Visintini, Valentina Bonora, and Erica Isabella Parisi. 2018. Examination of indoor mobile mapping systems in a diversified internal/external test field. Applied Sciences 8, 3 (2018), 401. DOI:
[21]
Okan Özdemir. 2021. A unique ıonic cymation from Theater of Diocaesarea (Uzuncaburç) in Rough Cilicia. Cultural Heritage and Science 2, 1 (2021), 19–24.
[22]
Deniz Kaplan. 2012. Diokaisareia'daki (Dağlik Kilikia) Podyumlu Tapinak İçin Tarihleme ve Kült Önerisi. OLBA 20, (2012), 173–200.
[23]
Ümit Aydınoğlu. 2021. Rural settlements survey in the Chora of Diocaesarea. Cultural Heritage and Science 2, 1 (2021), 1–6.
[24]
Afrooz Aryan, Frédéric Bosché, and Pingbo Tang. 2021. Planning for terrestrial laser scanning in construction: A review. Automation in Construction 125, (May 2021).
[25]
Muhammed Enes Atik and Zaide Duran. 2021. Lokal özellik temelli yöntemler kullanılarak 3B yüz tanıma ve doğruluk analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 36, 1 (2021) 359–372.
[26]
Czesław Suchocki, Marzena Damięcka-Suchocka, Jacek Katzer, Joanna Janicka, Jacek Rapiński, and Paulina Stałowska. 2020. Remote detection of moisture and bio-deterioration of building walls by time-of-flight and phase-shift terrestrial laser scanners. Remote Sensing 12, 11 (2020), 1708. DOI:
[27]
Czesław Suchocki. 2020. Comparison of time-of-flight and phase-shift TLS intensity data for the diagnostics measurements of buildings. Materials 13, 2 (2020), 353. DOI:
[28]
T. Ogawa and Y. Hori. 2019. Comparison with accuracy of terrestrial laser scanner by using point cloud aligned with shape matching and best fitting methods. ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume XLII-2/W9 (2019), 535–541. DOI:
[30]
Frank Dellaert, Steven M. Seitz, Charles E. Thorpe, and Sebastian Thrun. 2000. Structure from motion without correspondence. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2, (2000), 557–564. DOI:
[31]
George Pavlidisa, Anestis Koutsoudisa, Fotis Arnaoutogloua, Vassilios Tsioukas, and Christodoulos Chamzas. 2007. Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8, 1 (2007), 93–98. DOI:
[32]
Mark A. Fonstad, James T. Dietrich, Brittany C. Courville, Jennifer L. Jensen, and Patrice E. Carbonneau. 2013. Topographic structure from motion: A new development in photogrammetric measurement. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38 (2013), 421–430, DOI:
[33]
Andrew Bevan, Xiuzhen Janice Li, Marcos Martinon-Torres, Susie Green, Yin Xia, Kun Zhao, Zhen Zhao, Shengtao Ma, Wei Cao, and Thilo Rehren. 2014. Computer vision, archaeological classification and China's Terracotta Warriors. Journal of Archaeological Science 49, (2014), 249–254. DOI:
[34]
Anestis Koutsoudisa, Blaž Vidmar, George Ioannakisa, Fotis Arnaoutoglou, George Pavlidis, and Christodoulos Chamzas. 2014. Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evaluation. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15, 1 (2014), 73–79. DOI:
[35]
Yusuf Doğan and Murat Yakar. 2018. Gıs and three-dimensıonal modeling for cultural heritages. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences 3, 2 (2018), 50–55. DOI:
[36]
Ahmet Şasi and Murat Yakar. 2017. Photogrammetric modelling of Sakahane Masjid using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Turkish Journal of Engineering 1, 2 (2017), 82–87.
[37]
Nizar Polat, Seçil Çokoğullu, Abdulkadir Memduhoğlu, Mustafa Ulukavak, Halil İbrahim Şenol, Oral Muharrem, Mahmut Karaçizmeli, and Özgür Marangoz. 2021. İHA fotogrametrisinin arkeolojik yüzey araştirmalarina katkilarinin incelenmesi. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 28 (2021), 175–186.
[38]
Murat Yakar, Hacı Murat Yılmaz, and Ömer Mutluoglu. 2014. Performance of photogrammetric and terrestrial laser scanning methods in volume computing of excavation and filling areas. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 39, 1 (2014), 387–394.
[39]
Ting On Chan, Derek D. Lichti, David Belton, Bernhard Klingseisen, and Petra Helmholz. 2016. Survey accuracy analysis of a hand-held mobile LiDAR device for cultural heritage documentation. PFG Photogrammetrie – Fernerkundung – Geoinformation 3, (2016) 153–165.
[40]
Young Hoon Jo and Seonghyuk Hong. 2019. Three-dimensional digital documentation of cultural heritage site based on the convergence of terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. International Journal of GeoInformation, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 8, 53 (2019)
[41]
G. J. Grenzdörffer, M. Naumann, F. Niemeyer, and A. Frank. 2015. Symbiosis of UAS photogrammetry and TLS for surveying and 3D modeling of cultural heritage monuments—A case study about the Cathedral of St. Nicholas in the city of Greifswald. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40, 1 (2015), 91–96.
[42]
G. Patrucco, F. Rinaudo, and A. Spreafico. 2019. Multi-source approaches for complex architecture documentation: The “Palazzo Ducale” ın Gubbıo (Perugia, Italy). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-2/W11, 2019, GEORES, Milan, Italy (8–10 May 2019)
[43]
M. G. Masciotta, L. J. Sanchez-Aparicio, D. V. Oliveira, and D. Gonzalez-Aguilera. 2022. Integration of laser scanning technologies and 360º photography for the digital documentation and management of cultural heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage,
[44]
Manuel Rodríguez-Martín, Luis Javier Sánchez-Aparicio, Miguel Ángel Maté-González, Ángel Luis Muñoz-Nieto, and Diego Gonzalez-Aguilera. 2022. Comprehensive generation of historical construction CAD models from data provided by a wearable mobile mapping system: A case study of the Church of Adanero (Ávila, Spain). Sensors 22, 2922.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)İHA Verileri ile CBS Tabanlı 3B Kent Modeli Örneği; Şefaatli Yeni MahalleTürkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi10.51534/tiha.13796336:1(1-6)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Prompt Mapping Tree Positions with Handheld Mobile Scanners Based on SLAM TechnologyLand10.3390/land1301009313:1(93)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Research on the Reconstruction Method of Old Houses in Mindong, Republic of China, Based on a Wearable Mobile Scanning SystemBuildings10.3390/buildings1406176614:6(1766)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of the Wearable Mobile Laser Scanner (WMLS) with Other Point Cloud Data Collection Methods in Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Diokaisareia

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
    Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 15, Issue 4
    December 2022
    483 pages
    ISSN:1556-4673
    EISSN:1556-4711
    DOI:10.1145/3572828
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 December 2022
    Online AM: 04 August 2022
    Accepted: 30 May 2022
    Received: 03 September 2021
    Published in JOCCH Volume 15, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Wearable mobile laser (WMLS)
    2. terrestrial laser (TLS)
    3. UAV
    4. point cloud
    5. cultural heritage documentation
    6. Diokaisareia

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)119
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)İHA Verileri ile CBS Tabanlı 3B Kent Modeli Örneği; Şefaatli Yeni MahalleTürkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi10.51534/tiha.13796336:1(1-6)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Prompt Mapping Tree Positions with Handheld Mobile Scanners Based on SLAM TechnologyLand10.3390/land1301009313:1(93)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Research on the Reconstruction Method of Old Houses in Mindong, Republic of China, Based on a Wearable Mobile Scanning SystemBuildings10.3390/buildings1406176614:6(1766)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2024
    • (2024)The Utilization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in Cultural Heritage Buildings: A Systematic Literature ReviewIranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering10.1007/s40996-024-01523-5Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
    • (2023)A Low-Cost, UAV-Based, Methodological Approach for Morphometric Analysis of Belci Lake Dam Breach, RomaniaWater10.3390/w1509165515:9(1655)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Integrated Surveying, from Laser Scanning to UAV Systems, for Detailed Documentation of Architectural and Archeological HeritageDrones10.3390/drones70905687:9(568)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Narrating Ancient Roman Heritage through Drawings and Digital Architectural Representation: From Historical Archives, UAV and LIDAR to Virtual-Visual Storytelling and HBIM ProjectsDrones10.3390/drones70100517:1(51)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Review of Photogrammetric and Lidar Applications of UAVApplied Sciences10.3390/app1311673213:11(6732)Online publication date: 31-May-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media