research-article

Factors Influencing Engagement in Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality

Authors:

Eugene Ch’ng,

Sue CobbAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Volume 30, Issue 4

Article No.: 65, Pages 1 - 27

https://doi.org/10.1145/3589952

Published: 11 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Hybridity in immersive technologies has not been studied for factors that are likely to influence engagement. A noticeable factor is the spatial enclosure that defines where users meet. This involves a mutual object of interest, contents that the users may generate around the object, and the proximity between users. This study examines these factors, namely how object interactivity, user-generated contents (UGC) and avatar proximity influence engagement. We designed a Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality (HVAR) environment that supports paired users to experience cultural heritage in both Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). A user study was conducted with 60 participants, providing assessments of engagement and presence via questionnaires, together with mobile electroencephalogram (mEEG) and user activity data that measures VR user engagement in real-time. Our findings provide insights into how engagement between users can occur in HVAR environments for the future hybrid reality with multi-device connectivity.

References

[1]

Rebecca L. Acabchuk, Mareyna A. Simon, Spencer Low, Julie M. Brisson, and Blair T. Johnson. 2021. Measuring meditation progress with a consumer-grade EEG device: Caution from a randomized controlled trial. Mindfulness 12, 1 (2021), 68–81.

[2]

Mafkereseb Kassahun Bekele, Roberto Pierdicca, Emanuele Frontoni, and E. V. A. Savina Malinverni. 2018. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 11, 2 (2018), 36.

Digital Library

[3]

Chris Berka, Daniel J. Levendowski, Michelle N. Lumicao, Alan Yau, Gene Davis, Vladimir T. Zivkovic, Richard E. Olmstead, Patrice D. Tremoulet, and Patrick L. Craven. 2007. EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 78, 5 II (2007).

[4]

Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2013. Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. Human-Computer Interaction 28, 1 (2013), 40–75.

[5]

Benjamin Blankertz, Michael Tangermann, Carmen Vidaurre, Siamac Fazli, Claudia Sannelli, Stefan Haufe, Cecilia Maeder, Lenny Ramsey, Irene Sturm, Gabriel Curio, and Klaus Robert Müller. 2010. The Berlin brain-computer interface: Non-medical uses of BCI technology.

[6]

Doug A. Bowman and Ryan P. McMahan. 2007. Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer 40, 7 (Jul.2007), 36–43.

Digital Library

[7]

Jennifer Brade, Mario Lorenz, Marc Busch, Niels Hammer, Manfred Tscheligi, and Philipp Klimant. 2017. Being there again - presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability and user experience using a mobile navigation task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 101, March 2016 (2017), 76–87.

Digital Library

[8]

Jeanne H. Brockmyer, Christine M. Fox, Kathleen A. Curtiss, Evan McBroom, Kimberly M. Burkhart, and Jacquelyn N. Pidruzny. 2009. The development of the game engagement questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, 4 (Jul.2009), 624–634.

[9]

Emily Brown and Paul Cairns. 2004. A grounded investigation of game immersion. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings.

Digital Library

[10]

Marc Busch, Mario Lorenz, Manfred Tscheligi, Christina Hochleitner, and Trenton Schulz. 2014. Being there for real: Presence in real and virtual environments and its relation to usability. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI’14 Helsinki, Finland), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 117–126.

Digital Library

[11]

Cédric Cannard, Helané Wahbeh, and Arnaud Delorme. 2021. Electroencephalography correlates of well-being using a low-cost wearable system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15, December (2021).

[12]

Eugene Ch’ng and Neil Cooke. 2015. User study on 3D multitouch interaction (3DMi) and gaze on surface computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9187 (2015), 425–433.

Digital Library

[13]

Eugene Ch’ng, Yue Li, Shengdan Cai, and Fui Theng Leow. 2020. The effects of VR environments on the acceptance, experience, and expectations of cultural heritage learning. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 13, 1 (2020), 1–20.

Digital Library

[14]

James J. Cummings and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2016. How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology 19, 2 (2016), 272–309.

[15]

Marcel Danesi. 2016. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.

[16]

Kevin Doherty and Gavin Doherty. 2018. Engagement in HCI: Conception, theory and measurement. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51, 5 (2018), 99:1—-99:39.

Digital Library

[17]

Steven Dow. 2007. User engagement in physically embodied narrative experiences. Creativity and Cognition 2007, CC2007 - Seeding Creativity: Tools, Media, and Environments (2007), 280.

Digital Library

[18]

John Howard Falk and Lynn Diane Dierking. 2000. Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. arxiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3

[19]

Frederick G. Freeman, Peter J. Mikulka, Lawrence J. Prinzel, and Mark W. Scerbo. 1999. Evaluation of an adaptive automation system using three EEG indices with a visual tracking task. Biological Psychology 50, 1 (1999), 61–76.

[20]

Lukas Gehrke, Sezen Akman, Pedro Lopes, Albert Chen, Avinash Kumar Singh, Hsiang-ting Chen, Chin-Teng Lin, and Klaus Gramann. 2019. Detecting visuo-haptic mismatches in virtual reality using the prediction error negativity of event-related brain potentials. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–11.

Digital Library

[21]

Philippe Gelisse, Pierre Genton, and Arielle Crespel. 2020. Failure to recognize muscular artifacts on the EEG may cause a wrong diagnosis of myoclonic status epilepticus. Epilepsy and Behavior Reports 14 (2020), 0–2.

[22]

Sergio Giraldo and Rafael Ramirez. 2013. Brain-activity-driven real-time music emotive control. 3rd International Conference on Music & EmotionJune (2013), 11–15.

[23]

Edward T. Hall. 1973. The hidden dimension. Leonardo (1973).

[24]

Mariam Hassib, Stefan Schneegass, Philipp Eiglsperger, Niels Henze, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt. 2017. EngageMeter: A system for implicit audience engagement sensing using electroencephalography. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2017-May (2017), 5114–5119.

Digital Library

[25]

Carrie Heeter. 1992. Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 2 (Jan.1992), 262–271.

[26]

Richard M. Held and Nathaniel I. Durlach. 1992. Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 1 (Jan.1992), 109–112.

[27]

Yvonne Hellin-Hobbs. 2010. The constructivist museum and the web.

[28]

Patrick Hennig, Philipp Berger, Christoph Meinel, Maria Graber, Jens Hildebrandt, Stefan Lehmann, and Cathleen Ramson. 2013. Tracking visitor engagement in the blogosphere for leveraging rankings. In Proceedings - SocialCom/PASSAT/BigData/EconCom/BioMedCom 2013.

Digital Library

[29]

Wijnand Ijsselsteijn and Giuseppe Riva. 2003. Being there: The experience of presence in mediated environments. Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurement of user Presence in Synthetic Environments (2003), 14. https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:4444927

[30]

Alejandro Jaimes, Mounia Lalmas, and Yana Volkovich. 2011. First international workshop on social media engagement (SoME 2011). In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW 2011.

Digital Library

[31]

Maria Koutamanis, Helen G. M. Vossen, and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2015. Adolescents’ comments in social media: Why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk? Computers in Human Behavior 53 (2015), 486–494.

Digital Library

[32]

Olave E. Krigolson, Mathew R. Hammerstrom, Wande Abimbola, Robert Trska, Bruce W. Wright, Kent G. Hecker, and Gordon Binsted. 2021. Using Muse: Rapid mobile assessment of brain performance. Frontiers in Neuroscience 15, January (2021), 1–11.

[33]

Olave E. Krigolson, Chad C. Williams, and Francisco L. Colino. 2017. Using portable EEG to assess human visual attention. Vol. 10284. 56–65.

[34]

Cliff Lampe. 2013. Behavioral trace data for analyzing online communities. In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research.

[35]

Jane Lessiter, Jonathan Freeman, Edmund Keogh, and Jules Davidoff. 2001. A cross-media presence questionnaire: The ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence 10, 3 (2001), 282–297.

Digital Library

[36]

Yue Li, Eugene Ch’ng, Shengdan Cai, and Simon See. 2018. Multiuser interaction with hybrid VR and AR for cultural heritage objects. In Digital Heritage 2018. IEEE, San Francisco, CA, USA.

[37]

Yue Li, Eugene Ch’ng, Sue Cobb, and Simon See. 2022. Presence and communication in hybrid virtual and augmented reality environments. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality (2022).

[38]

Yue Li, Paul Tennent, and Sue Cobb. 2019. Appropriate control methods for mobile virtual exhibitions. In VRTCH’18. Springer, Brasov, Romania.

[39]

Matthew Lombard and Theresa Ditton. 1997. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 2 (1997), 0.

[40]

Matthew Lombard, Theresa B. Ditton, and Lisa Weinstein. 2009. Measuring presence: The temple presence inventory. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence. 1–15. http://www.temple.edu/ispr/prev_conferences/proceedings/2009/Lombard_et_al.pdf.

[41]

Jack M. Loomis. 1992. Distal attribution and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments - Premier issue 1, 1 (1992), 113–119.

Digital Library

[42]

Nicolai Marquardt and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Informing the design of proxemic interactions. IEEE Pervasive Computing (2012).

Digital Library

[43]

Alison McMahan. 2003. Immersion, engagement, and presence: A method for analyzing 3-D video games. In The Video Game Theory Reader.

[44]

Ryan P. McMahan, Doug A. Bowman, David J. Zielinski, and Rachael B. Brady. 2012. Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 4 (2012), 626–633.

Digital Library

[45]

Timothy McMahan, Ian Parberry, and Thomas D. Parsons. 2015. Evaluating player task engagement and arousal using electroencephalography. Procedia Manufacturing 3, Ahfe (2015), 2303–2310.

[46]

Michael Meehan, Brent Insko, Mary Whitton, and Frederick P. Brooks. 2002. Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques - SIGGRAPH’02. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 645.

Digital Library

[47]

Marvin Minsky. 1980. Telepresence. OMNI MagazineJune (1980), 1–6.

[48]

Diego Monteiro, Hai Ning Liang, Andrew Abel, Nilufar Bahaei, and Rita De Cassia Monteiro. 2018. Evaluating engagement of virtual reality games based on first and third person perspective using EEG and subjective metrics. Proceedings - 2018 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality, AIVR 2018 (2018), 53–60.

[49]

Helen Neale and Sarah Nichols. 2001. Theme-based content analysis: A flexible method for virtual environment evaluation. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 55, 2 (2001), 167–189.

Digital Library

[50]

Heather L. O’Brien, Paul Cairns, and Mark Hall. 2018. A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 112, December 2017 (2018), 28–39.

[51]

Heather L. O’Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2008. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6 (2008), 938–955.

[52]

Heather L. O’Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2010. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 1 (Jan.2010), 50–69.

[53]

Jeeyun Oh and S. Shyam Sundar. 2016. User engagement with interactive media: A communication perspective. In Why Engagement Matters. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 177–198.

[54]

Jorge Peña and Seung-Chul Yoo. 2014. Under pressure: Avatar appearance and cognitive load effects on attitudes, trustworthiness, bidding, and interpersonal distance in a virtual store. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 23, 1 (Feb.2014), 18–32.

Digital Library

[55]

Matthew Pike and Eugene Ch’ng. 2016. Evaluating virtual reality experience and performance: A brain based approach. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry - VRCAI’16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 469–474.

Digital Library

[56]

Alan T. Pope, Edward H. Bogart, and Debbie S. Bartolome. 1995. Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task. Biological Psychology 40, 1–2 (1995), 187–195.

[57]

Lawrence J. Prinzel, Frederick G. Freeman, Mark W. Scerbo, Peter J. Mikulka, and Alan T. Pope. 2000. A closed-loop system for examining psychophysiological measures for adaptive task allocation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 10, 4 (2000), 393–410.

[58]

Holger Regenbrecht. 2002. Measuring presence in augmented reality environments: Design and a first test of a questionnaire. Annual International Workshop Presence (2002), 1–4. https://www.google.com/%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/BE89B550-B84B-4411-9464-71837C29609F.

[59]

Marco C. Rozendaal, David V. Keyson, Huib de Ridder, and Peter O. Craig. 2009. Game feature and expertise effects on experienced richness, control and engagement in game play. AI and Society (2009).

Digital Library

[60]

Thomas Schubert, Frank Friedmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2001. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 3 (2001), 266–281.

Digital Library

[61]

Martijn J. Schuemie, Peter van der Straaten, Merel Krijn, and Charles A. P. G. van der Mast. 2001. Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4, 2 (2001), 183–201.

[62]

Neta Shaby, Orit Ben Zvi Assaraf, and Tali Tal. 2017. The particular aspects of science museum exhibits that encourage students’ engagement. Journal of Science Education and Technology (2017).

[63]

Thomas B. Sheridan. 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1, 1 (1992), 120–126.

Digital Library

[64]

Richard Skarbez, Frederick P. Brooks, and Mary C. Whitton. 2017. A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput. Surv. Article 50, 96 (2017).

Digital Library

[65]

Mel Slater. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 1535 (2009), 3549–3557.

[66]

Mel Slater, Christoph Guger, Guenter Edlinger, Robert Leeb, Gert Pfurtscheller, Angus Antley, Maia Garau, Andrea Brogni, and Doron Friedman. 2006. Analysis of physiological responses to a social situation in an immersive virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 5 (2006), 553–569.

Digital Library

[67]

Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1994. Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 3 (1994), 130–144.

Digital Library

[68]

Mel Slater and Sylvia Wilbur. 1997. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 6 (Dec.1997), 603–616.

Digital Library

[69]

Jonathan Steuer. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42, 4 (1992), 73–93.

[70]

Stella Sylaiou, Katerina Mania, Athanasis Karoulis, and Martin White. 2010. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 68, 5 (2010), 243–253.

Digital Library

[71]

Arthur Tang, Frank Biocca, and Lynette Lim. 2004. Comparing differences in presence during social interaction in augmented reality versus virtual reality environments : An exploratory study. 7th Annual International Workshop on Presence (2004), 204–208. papers3://publication/uuid/81D1A395-AA28-4DC5-9C50-3FD2A207F6B6

[72]

Paul Tennent, Sarah Martindale, Steve Benford, and Dimitrios Darzentas. 2020. Thresholds : Embedding virtual reality in the museum. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 13, 2 (2020), 12:1–12:35.

Digital Library

[73]

Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays: Transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. UIST: Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 6, 2 (2004), 137–146.

Digital Library

[74]

Cassandra M. Wilkinson, Jennifer I. Burrell, Jonathan W. P. Kuziek, Sibi Thirunavukkarasu, Brian H. Buck, and Kyle E. Mathewson. 2020. Predicting stroke severity with a 3-min recording from the Muse portable EEG system for rapid diagnosis of stroke. Scientific Reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–11.

[75]

Bob G. Witmer, Christian J. Jerome, and Michael J. Singer. 2005. The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14, 3 (2005), 298–312.

Digital Library

[76]

Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments (Aug.1998), 225–240. http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/proceeding.aspx?doi=10.1117/12.2233447.

Digital Library

Cited By

Pradhan BMantry A(2024)Designing Effective VR Learning EnvironmentsCreating Immersive Learning Experiences Through Virtual Reality (VR)10.4018/979-8-3693-6407-9.ch004(77-104)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6407-9.ch004
Fabre ÉRekimoto JItoh Y(2024)Exploring the Kuroko Paradigm: The Effect of Enhancing Virtual Humans with Reality Actuators in Augmented RealityProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 202410.1145/3652920.3652945(79-90)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652920.3652945
Han JVande Moere ASimeone A(2024)Meaning Follows Purpose: Unravelling the Architectural Design Conventions in the Contemporary MetaverseProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642519(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642519
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Factors Influencing Engagement in Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Extending Virtual Reality Display Wall Environments Using Augmented Reality
SUI '19: Symposium on Spatial User Interaction

Two major form factors for virtual reality are head-mounted displays and large display environments such as CAVE®and the LCD-based successor CAVE2®. Each of these has distinct advantages and limitations based on how they’re used. This work explores ...
Interactive Augmented Live Virtual Reality Streaming: A Health Care Application
ICMHI '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics

Virtual Reality (VR) technology has been around for decades; however, we have probably only begun to realize the practical applications until recent years. With increase of computing power, decrease of cost and physical dimension, a new class of ...
Negative Effects Associated with HMDs in Augmented and Virtual Reality
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Design and Interaction
Abstract
Head mounted displays (HMD) are becoming ubiquitous. Simulator sickness has been an issue since the first simulators and HMDs were created. As computational power and display capabilities increase, so does their utilization in technologies such ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Volume 30, Issue 4

August 2023

614 pages

ISSN:1073-0516

EISSN:1557-7325

DOI:10.1145/3623486

Editors:
Kristina Höök
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
,
Kasper Hornbæk
University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 September 2023

Online AM: 30 March 2023

Accepted: 21 February 2023

Revised: 13 February 2023

Received: 26 August 2021

Published in TOCHI Volume 30, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Natural Science Foundation of China
Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
1,393
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,004
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)85

Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Pradhan BMantry A(2024)Designing Effective VR Learning EnvironmentsCreating Immersive Learning Experiences Through Virtual Reality (VR)10.4018/979-8-3693-6407-9.ch004(77-104)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6407-9.ch004
Fabre ÉRekimoto JItoh Y(2024)Exploring the Kuroko Paradigm: The Effect of Enhancing Virtual Humans with Reality Actuators in Augmented RealityProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 202410.1145/3652920.3652945(79-90)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652920.3652945
Han JVande Moere ASimeone A(2024)Meaning Follows Purpose: Unravelling the Architectural Design Conventions in the Contemporary MetaverseProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642519(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642519
Sindiramutty SJhanjhi NRay SJazri HKhan NGaur L(2023)MetaverseMetaverse Applications for Intelligent Healthcare10.4018/978-1-6684-9823-1.ch003(93-158)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2023
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9823-1.ch003
Wang YLi YLiang H(2023)Comparative Analysis of Artefact Interaction and Manipulation Techniques in VR Museums: A Study of Performance and User Experience2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00091(761-770)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00091
Maqbool HCook DNapier CArmstrong LDiepeveen DNyeete H(2023)Early Aesthetics Integration in Digital Twin Dashboards in Isolated Agriculture: Data Modelling and Remote Networks2023 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience, Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (AGERS)10.1109/AGERS61027.2023.10490774(77-83)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/AGERS61027.2023.10490774

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents