Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3613905.3637118acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Synocene, Beyond the Anthropocene: De-Anthropocentralising Human-Nature-AI Interaction

Published: 11 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Recent publications explore AI biases in detecting objects and people in the environment. However, there is no research tackling how AI examines nature. This case study presents a pioneering exploration into the AI attitudes – ecocentric, anthropocentric and antipathetic– toward nature. Experiments with a Large Language Model (LLM) and an image captioning algorithm demonstrate the presence of anthropocentric biases in AI. Moreover, to delve deeper into these biases and Human-Nature-AI interaction, we conducted a real-life experiment in which participants underwent an immersive de-anthropocentric experience in a forest and subsequently engaged with ChatGPT to co-create narratives. By creating fictional AI chatbot characters with ecocentric attributes, emotions and views, we successfully amplified ecocentric exchanges. We encountered some difficulties, mainly that participants deviated from narrative co-creation to short dialogues and questions and answers, possibly due to the novelty of interacting with LLMs. To solve this problem, we recommend providing preliminary guidelines on interacting with LLMs and allowing participants to get familiar with the technology. We plan to repeat this experiment in various countries and forests to expand our corpus of ecocentric materials.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Talk Video
MP4 File - Video Preview
Video Preview

References

[1]
Riley E Dunlap and Kent D Van Liere. 1978. The “new environmental paradigm”. The journal of environmental education 9, 4 (1978), 10–19.
[2]
Sinan Erten. 2008. Insights to ecocentric, anthropocentric and antipathetic attitudes towards environment in diverse cultures. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 33 (2008), 141–156.
[3]
European Union. 2023. EU’s Natura 2000 sites. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/index_en.htm. online.
[4]
Liuna Geng, Jingke Xu, Lijuan Ye, Wenjun Zhou, and Kexin Zhou. 2015. Connections with nature and environmental behaviors. PloS one 10, 5 (2015), e0127247.
[5]
Tim Hollo. 2019. Rebalancing rights: communities, corporations and nature. The Green Institute.
[6]
Isabelle Hupont and Carles Fernández. 2019. Demogpairs: Quantifying the impact of demographic imbalance in deep face recognition. In 2019 14th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2019). IEEE, 1–7.
[7]
Marijn Janssen, Martijn Hartog, Ricardo Matheus, Aaron Yi Ding, and George Kuk. 2022. Will algorithms blind people? The effect of explainable AI and decision-makers’ experience on AI-supported decision-making in government. Social Science Computer Review 40, 2 (2022), 478–493.
[8]
Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi. 2022. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 12888–12900.
[9]
Katharina Mader. 2003. Environment across cultures. Vol. 19. Springer Science & Business Media.
[10]
OpenAI. 2023. ChatGPT’s API. Available: https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference. online.
[11]
Atieh Poushneh. 2021. Humanizing voice assistant: The impact of voice assistant personality on consumers’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 58 (2021), 102283.
[12]
Vinay Uday Prabhu and Abeba Birhane. 2020. Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.16923 (2020).
[13]
Jérôme Rutinowski, Sven Franke, Jan Endendyk, Ina Dormuth, and Markus Pauly. 2023. The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07333 (2023).
[14]
P Schultz. 2002. Environmental attitudes and behaviors across cultures. Online readings in psychology and culture 8, 1 (2002), 4.
[15]
Suzanne C Gagnon Thompson and Michelle A Barton. 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of environmental Psychology 14, 2 (1994), 149–157.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2024
4761 pages
ISBN:9798400703317
DOI:10.1145/3613905
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 May 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. AI biases mitigation
  2. Anthropocentric AI
  3. Human-Nature-AI Interaction

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Data Availability

Conference

CHI '24

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 180
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)180
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29
Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media