Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Definitions and demographics

Published: 01 January 2001 Publication History

Abstract

Who are software engineers? Answering this question properly, by defining the profession clearly and counting practitioners accurately, will help all software engineers. Practitioners will better understand the career paths that are available. Managers will better understand the jobs that employees fill. Researchers will better predict how the field will evolve. The software engineering community will better understand its identity and will better wield its influence. And, everyone will be able to make more responsible distinctions between who is and is not a software engineer.In the first section, I propose a definition of software engineers as those who focus primarily on software development and who have some depth and breadth of experience in the process, and I propose a scaling model of software engineering demographics. In the second section, I discuss the difficulty of distinguishing between software engineers and non-engineers. I believe that credentials will evolve to help clarify this distinction. And in the third section, I call for a new demographic study tailored to the needs of software engineers. This study should create a complete portrait of the field.I also respond to several criticisms of A Whole New Kind of Engineering: I explain why I believe that in 1998, about 1,000,000 software engineers existed in the U.S. and why software engineers do not need computer science or even technical degrees to prove themselves today, though this will surely change in the future.

References

[1]
Samuel C. Florman (1996) The Introspective Engineer, St. Martin's Griffin.
[2]
Steve McConnell (1999) After the Gold Rush, Microsoft Press.
[3]
L. B. S. Raccoon (2000) A Whole New Kind of Engineering, in Software Engineering Notes, Volume 25, Number 1, Pages 109 to 113, January 2000, ACM Press.
[4]
Karen Rothermel, Curtis R. Cook, Margaret M. Burnett, Justin Schonfeld, T. R. G. Green, and Gregg Rothermel (2000) WYSIWYT Testing in the Spreadsheet Paradigm: An Empirical Evaluation, in Proceeding of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Pages 230 to 239, ACM Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2007)Use of non-IT testers in software developmentProceedings of the 8th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement10.5555/2394450.2394472(175-187)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2007
  • (2002)Practitioners do good workACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/511152.51116027:2(46-52)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 26, Issue 1
January 2001
107 pages
ISSN:0163-5948
DOI:10.1145/505894
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2001
Published in SIGSOFT Volume 26, Issue 1

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2007)Use of non-IT testers in software developmentProceedings of the 8th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement10.5555/2394450.2394472(175-187)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2007
  • (2002)Practitioners do good workACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/511152.51116027:2(46-52)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2002

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media