Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037442acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the need for different security methods on mobile phones

Published: 30 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Mobile phones are rapidly becoming small-size general purpose computers, so-called smartphones. However, applications and data stored on mobile phones are less protected from unauthorized access than on most desktop and mobile computers. This paper presents a survey on users' security needs, awareness and concerns in the context of mobile phones. It also evaluates acceptance and perceived protection of existing and novel authentication methods. The responses from 465 participants reveal that users are interested in increased security and data protection. The current protection by using PIN (Personal Identification Number) is perceived as neither adequate nor convenient in all cases. The sensitivity of data stored on the devices varies depending on the data type and the context of use, asking for the need for another level of protection. According to these findings, a two-level security model for mobile phones is proposed. The model provides differential data and service protection by utilizing existing capabilities of a mobile phone for authenticating users.

References

[1]
Ben-Asher, N., Ben-Oved, A., Meyer, J.: Preliminary survey results --- project "Graded Security for Mobiles". Deutsche Telekom Laboratories 2009
[2]
Botha, R., Furnell, S., and Clarke, N.: From desktop to mobile: Examining the security experience. Computers & Security, 28(3--4):130--137, 2009.
[3]
Braz, C., and Robert, J.: Security and usability: the case of the user authentication methods. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine, page 203. ACM, 2006.
[4]
Clarke, N., and Furnell, S.: Authentication of users on mobile telephones --- A survey of attitudes and practices. Computers & Security, 24(7):519--527, 2005.
[5]
Clarke, N., and Furnell, S.: Advanced user authentication for mobile devices. Computers & Security, 26(2):109--119, 2007.
[6]
Clarke, N., Furnell, S., Rodwell, P., and Reynolds P.: Acceptance of subscriber authentication methods for mobile telephony devices. Computers & Security, 21(3):220--228, 2002.
[7]
Clarke, N., Furnell, S., Reynolds P.: Biometric authentication for mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Information Warfare and Security Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 28--29 November 2002
[8]
Dörflinger, T., Voth, A., Krämer, J.: "My Smartphone is a Safe!" The user's point of view regarding novel authentication methods and gradual security levels on smartphones. The International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT) 2010, July 26--28, Athens, Greece
[9]
Furnell, S., Clarke, N., and Karatzouni, S.: Beyond the pin: Enhancing user authentication for mobile devices. Computer Fraud & Security, 2008(8):12--17, 2008.
[10]
IDC: IDC press release from 28 Jan 2010 at www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId= prUS22186410
[11]
Imperva Application Defense Center: Consumer Password Worst Practices. Imperva 2010 at www.imperva.com/docs/WP_Consumer_Password_Worst_Practices.pdf
[12]
Jain, A. K., Flynn, P., Ross, A. A. (eds.): Handbook of Biometrics. Springer (2008)
[13]
Karlson, A., Brush, A., and Schechter, S.: Can I borrow your phone?: Understanding concerns when sharing mobile phones. Proceedings of the 27thinternational conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1647--1650. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[14]
Kowalski, S. and Goldstein, M.: Consumers' Awareness of, Attitudes Towards and Adoption of Mobile Phone Security. Human Factors in Telecommunication (HFT) 06, 2006.
[15]
Leavitt, N.: Mobile phones: The next frontier for hackers. IEEE Computer, 38(4): 20--23, 2005.
[16]
McAfee, I.: Mobile Security Report 2009. Technical report, McAfee, 2009.
[17]
Richardson, R.: CSI computer crime and security survey. Computer Security Institute, 2009.
[18]
Riley, S.: Password security: what users know and what they actually do. Usability News, 8(1), 2006.
[19]
Samarati, P. and De Capitani di Vimercati, S.: Access control: Policies, models, and mechanisms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 137--196, 2001.
[20]
Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R.: Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 1(1):7--59, 1988.
[21]
Shaw, K.: Data on PDAs mostly unprotected, survey finds. World Wide Web electronic publication, 2004.
[22]
Sieger, H., Kirschnick, N., Möller, S.: Poster: User preferences for biometric authentication methods and graded security on mobile phones. Symposium on Usability, Privacy, and Security (SOUPS) 2010
[23]
Siponen, M.: A conceptual foundation for organizational information security awareness. Information Management and Computer Security, 8(1):31--41, 2000.
[24]
Tognazzini, B.: Design for Usability. Cranor, L. F., Garfinkel, S. (eds.): Security and Usability. Designing Secure Systems That People Can Use. O'Reilly (2005)
[25]
Examined websites (as of early February 2011): Apple, Inc.: www.apple.com, LG Electronics, Inc.: www.lge.com, Motorola, Inc.: www.motorola.com, Nokia Corp.: www.nokia.com, Research in Motion Ltd.: www.rim.com, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.: www.samsumg.com, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB: www.sonyericsson.com

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Scale Development and Application Study on Smartphone Security AwarenessGazi University Journal of Science10.35378/gujs.142798437:4(1691-1705)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Effects of Age and Mobile Technology Usage on Employee EngagementEnvironment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI17.54549:SI17(479-484)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Extracting product design guidance from online reviews: An explainable neural network-based approachExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121357236(121357)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
August 2011
781 pages
ISBN:9781450305419
DOI:10.1145/2037373
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Nokia
  • Swedish Institute of Computer Science: Swedish Institute of Computer Science
  • ERICSSON

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 August 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. authentication
  2. authentication methods
  3. data protection
  4. graded security model
  5. mobile phone security
  6. survey

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MobileHCI '11
Sponsor:
  • Swedish Institute of Computer Science

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Scale Development and Application Study on Smartphone Security AwarenessGazi University Journal of Science10.35378/gujs.142798437:4(1691-1705)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Effects of Age and Mobile Technology Usage on Employee EngagementEnvironment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal10.21834/e-bpj.v9iSI17.54549:SI17(479-484)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Extracting product design guidance from online reviews: An explainable neural network-based approachExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121357236(121357)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Age and gender difference in ICT literacy and biometrics knowledgeSociální studia / Social Studies10.5817/SOC2022-2129120:1Online publication date: 2-Aug-2023
  • (2023)"Stalking is immoral but not illegal"Proceedings of the Nineteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3632186.3632189(37-56)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
  • (2023)A Deep Dive into User's Preferences and Behavior around Mobile Phone SharingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35795957:CSCW1(1-22)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Willingness of sharing facial data for emotion recognition: a case study in the insurance marketAI & SOCIETY10.1007/s00146-023-01690-539:5(2373-2384)Online publication date: 28-May-2023
  • (2022)”Ask this from the person who has private stuff”: Privacy Perceptions, Behaviours and Beliefs Beyond W.E.I.R.DProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501883(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2021)Biometric Systems in Mobile DevicesResearch Anthology on Securing Mobile Technologies and Applications10.4018/978-1-7998-8545-0.ch023(426-433)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Theft Preventive Measures for Interconnected Personal Computer Devices as Proactive Physical Security of DataResearch Anthology on Securing Mobile Technologies and Applications10.4018/978-1-7998-8545-0.ch018(337-352)Online publication date: 2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media