Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/342009.335420acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Eddies: continuously adaptive query processing

Published: 16 May 2000 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In large federated and shared-nothing databases, resources can exhibit widely fluctuating characteristics. Assumptions made at the time a query is submitted will rarely hold throughout the duration of query processing. As a result, traditional static query optimization and execution techniques are ineffective in these environments.
    In this paper we introduce a query processing mechanism called an eddy, which continuously reorders operators in a query plan as it runs. We characterize the moments of symmetry during which pipelined joins can be easily reordered, and the synchronization barriers that require inputs from different sources to be coordinated. By combining eddies with appropriate join algorithms, we merge the optimization and execution phases of query processing, allowing each tuple to have a flexible ordering of the query operators. This flexibility is controlled by a combination of fluid dynamics and a simple learning algorithm. Our initial implementation demonstrates promising results, with eddies performing nearly as well as a static optimizer/executor in static scenarios, and providing dramatic improvements in dynamic execution environments.

    References

    [1]
    A. C. Arpaci-Dusseau, R. H. Arpaci-Dusseau, D. E. Culler, J. M. Hellerstein, and D. A. Patterson. High-Performance Sorting on Networks of Workstations. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Tucson, May 1997.]]
    [2]
    R. H. Arpaci-Dusseau, E. Anderson, N. Treuhaft, D. E. Culler, J. M. Hellerstein, D. A. Patterson, and K. Yelick. Cluster I/O with River: Making the Fast Case Common. In Sixth Workshop on I/O in Parallel and Distributed Systems (IOPADS '99), pages 10-22, Atlanta, May 1999.]]
    [3]
    L. Amsaleg, M. J. Franklin, A. Tomasic, and T. Urhan. Scrambling Query Plans to Cope With Unexpected Delays. In 4th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems (PDIS), Miami Beach, December 1996.]]
    [4]
    R. Avnur and J. M. Hellerstein. Continuous query optimization. Technical Report CSD-99-1078, University of California, Berkeley, November 1999.]]
    [5]
    P. M. Aoki. How to Avoid Building DataBlades That Know the Value of Everything and the Cost of Nothing. In 11th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Cleveland, July 1999.]]
    [6]
    G. Antoshenkov and M. Ziauddin. Query Processing and Optimization in Oracle Rdb. VLDB Journal, 5(4):229-237, 1996.]]
    [7]
    R. Barnes. Scale Out. In High Performance Transaction Processing Workshop (HPTS '99), Asilomar, September 1999.]]
    [8]
    D. Barbara, W. DuMouchel, C. Faloutsos, P. J. Haas, J. M. Hellerstein, Y. E. Ioannidis, H. V. Jagadish, T. Johnson, R. T. Ng, V. Poosala, K. A. Ross, and K. C. Sevcik. The New Jersey Data Reduction Report. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 20(4), December 1997.]]
    [9]
    J. Boulos and K. Ono. Cost Estimation of User-Defined Methods in Object-Relational Database Systems. SIGMOD Record, 28(3):22-28, September 1999.]]
    [10]
    D. J. DeWitt, S. Ghandeharizadeh, D. Schneider, A. Bricker, H.-I Hsiao, and R. Rasmussen. The Gamma database machine project. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2(1):44-62, Mar 1990.]]
    [11]
    D. J. DeWitt, R. H. Katz, F. Olken, L. D. Shapiro, M. R. Stonebraker, and D. Wood. Implementation Techniques for Main Memory Database Systems. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 1-8, Boston, June 1984.]]
    [12]
    D. Florescu, I. Manolescu, A. Levy, and D. Suciu. Query Optimization in the Presence of Limited Access Patterns. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Phildelphia, June 1999.]]
    [13]
    G. Graefe and R. Cole. Optimization of Dynamic Query Evaluation Plans. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Minneapolis, 1994.]]
    [14]
    H. Garcia-Molina, Y. Papakonstantinou, D. Quass, A Rajaraman, Y. Sagiv, J. Ullman, and J. Widom. The TSIMMIS Project: Integration of Heterogeneous Information Sources. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 8(2):117-132, March 1997.]]
    [15]
    G. Graefe. Encapsulation of Parallelism in the Volcano Query Processing System. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 102-111, Atlantic City, May 1990.]]
    [16]
    S. D. Gribble, M. Welsh, E. A. Brewer, and D. Culler. The Multi- Space: an Evolutionary Platform for Infrastructural Services. In Proceedings of the 1999 Usenix Annual Technical Conference, Monterey, June 1999.]]
    [17]
    J. M. Hellerstein, R. Avnur, A. Chou, C. Hidber, C. Olston, V. Raman, T. Roth, and P. J. Haas. Interactive Data Analysis: The Control Project. IEEE Computer, 32(8):51-59, August 1999.]]
    [18]
    J. M. Hellerstein. Optimization Techniques for Queries with Expensive Methods. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 23(2):113-157, 1998.]]
    [19]
    P. J. Haas and J. M. Hellerstein. Ripple Joins for Online Aggregation. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 287-298, Philadelphia, 1999.]]
    [20]
    L. Haas, D. Kossmann, E. Wimmers, and J. Yang. Optimizing Queries Across Diverse Data Sources. In Proc. 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), Athens, 1997.]]
    [21]
    J. M. Hellerstein, M. Stonebraker, and R. Caccia. Open, Independent Enterprise Data Integration. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 22(1), March 1999. http://www.cohera.com.]]
    [22]
    Z. G. Ives, D. Florescu, M. Friedman, A. Levy, and D. S. Weld. An Adaptive Query Execution System for Data Integration. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Philadelphia, 1999.]]
    [23]
    T. Ibaraki and T. Kameda. Optimal Nesting for Computing N-relational Joins. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 9(3):482-502, October 1984.]]
    [24]
    Y. E. Ioannidis, R. T. Ng, K. Shim, and T. K. Sellis. Parametric Query Optimization. VLDB Journal, 6(2):132-151, 1997.]]
    [25]
    R. Krishnamurthy, H. Boral, and C. Zaniolo. Optimization of Nonrecursive Queries. In Proc. 12th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), pages 128-137, August 1986.]]
    [26]
    N. Kabra and D. J. DeWitt. Efficient Mid-Query Reoptimization of Sub-Optimal Query Execution Plans. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 106- 117, Seattle, 1998.]]
    [27]
    R. Van Meter. Observing the Effects of Multi-Zone Disks. In Proceedings of the Usenix 1997 Technical Conference, Anaheim, January 1997.]]
    [28]
    T. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, 1997.]]
    [29]
    K. W. Ng, Z. Wang, R. R. Muntz, and S. Nittel. Dynamic Query Re-Optimization. In 11th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Cleveland, July 1999.]]
    [30]
    B. Reinwald, H. Pirahesh, G. Krishnamoorthy, G. Lapis, B. Tran, and S. Vora. Heterogeneous Query Processing Through SQL Table Functions. In 15th International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 366-373, Sydney, March 1999.]]
    [31]
    V. Raman, B. Raman, and J. M. Hellerstein. Online Dynamic Reordering for Interactive Data Processing. In Proc. 25th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), pages 709-720, Edinburgh, 1999.]]
    [32]
    R. S. Sutton and A. G. Bartow. Reinforcement Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.]]
    [33]
    M. Stonebraker, P. Brown, and M. Herbach. Interoperability, Distributed Applications, and Distributed Databases: The Virtual Table Interface. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 21(3):25-34, September 1998.]]
    [34]
    E. D. Sontag. Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite-Dimensional Systems, Second Edition. Number 6 in Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.]]
    [35]
    M. R. Stonebraker, E. Wong, and P. Kreps. The Design and Implementation of INGRES. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(3):189-222, September 1976.]]
    [36]
    T. Urhan and M. Franklin. XJoin: Getting Fast Answers From Slow and Bursty Networks. Technical Report CS-TR-3994, University of Maryland, February 1999.]]
    [37]
    T. Urhan, M. Franklin, and L. Amsaleg. Cost-Based Query Scrambling for Initial Delays. In Proc. ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Seattle, June 1998.]]
    [38]
    A. N. Wilschut and P. M. G. Apers. Dataflow Query Execution in a Parallel Main-Memory Environment. In Proc. First International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Info. Sys. (PDIS), pages 68-77, 1991.]]
    [39]
    C. A. Waldspurger and W. E. Weihl. Lottery scheduling: Flexible proportional-share resource management. In Proc. of the First Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '94), pages 1-11, Monterey, CA, November 1994. USENIX Assoc.]]

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)POLAR: Adaptive and Non-invasive Join Order Selection via Plans of Least ResistanceProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3648160.364817517:6(1350-1363)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2024)ROME: Robust Query Optimization via Parallel Multi-Plan ExecutionProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549732:3(1-25)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
    • (2024)Optimizing Disjunctive Queries with Tagged ExecutionProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549612:3(1-25)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGMOD '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
    May 2000
    604 pages
    ISBN:1581132174
    DOI:10.1145/342009
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 May 2000

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SIGMOD/PODS00
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGMOD '00 Paper Acceptance Rate 42 of 248 submissions, 17%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)363
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48
    Reflects downloads up to

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)POLAR: Adaptive and Non-invasive Join Order Selection via Plans of Least ResistanceProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3648160.364817517:6(1350-1363)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2024)ROME: Robust Query Optimization via Parallel Multi-Plan ExecutionProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549732:3(1-25)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
    • (2024)Optimizing Disjunctive Queries with Tagged ExecutionProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36549612:3(1-25)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
    • (2024)Identifying the Root Causes of DBMS SuboptimalityACM Transactions on Database Systems10.1145/363642549:1(1-40)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Anser: Adaptive Information Sharing Framework of AnalyticDBProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611540.361155316:12(3636-3648)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Simple Adaptive Query Processing vs. Learned Query Optimizers: Observations and AnalysisProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611479.361150116:11(2962-2975)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
    • (2023)ADOPT: Adaptively Optimizing Attribute Orders for Worst-Case Optimal Join Algorithms via Reinforcement LearningProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611479.361148916:11(2805-2817)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Rethink Query Optimization in HTAP DatabasesProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36267501:4(1-27)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2023
    • (2023)BladeDISC: Optimizing Dynamic Shape Machine Learning Workloads via Compiler ApproachProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data10.1145/36173271:3(1-29)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Revisiting Runtime Dynamic Optimization for Join Queries in Big Data Management SystemsACM SIGMOD Record10.1145/3604437.360446052:1(104-113)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media