Article

Free access

A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings

Author:

Sara A. BlyAuthors Info & Claims

CSCW '88: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work

Pages 250 - 256

https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62286

Published: 01 January 1988 Publication History

PDF eReader

Abstract

Two-person design sessions were studied in three different settings: face-to-face, geographically separated with an audio/video link, and a telephone-only connection. In all settings, the designers' uses of a drawing surface were noted. Many similar drawing surface activities occurred in all design settings even though the settings did not each allow for the same sharing and interaction with the drawing surfaces. Observations suggest that the process of creating drawings may be as important to the design process as the drawings themselves. These preliminary results raise issues for further study, particularly with respect to computer support for collaborative drawing surface use.

References

[1]

Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., and Suchman, L. "Beyond the Chalkboard: Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings", Communications of the ACM 30, 1 (Jan. 1987).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Stults, R., Media Space, Xerox PARC technical report, 1986.

Google Scholar

[3]

Goodman, G., and Abel, M. "Collaboration Research in SCL", Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Austin, TX (Dec. 1986).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Stults, R., "The Office Design Project, an experimental use of a media space", report in progress, 1988.

Google Scholar

[5]

Tang, J., and Leifer, L. "A Framework for Understanding the Workspace Activity of Design Teams", Proceedings of the Second Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, OR (Sept. 1988).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Chen LLiang HWang JQu YYue Y(2021)On the Use of Large Interactive Displays to Support Collaborative Engagement and Visual Exploratory TasksSensors10.3390/s2124840321:24(8403)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248403
Findlater LGoodman SZhao YAzenkot SHanley M(2020)Fairness issues in AI systems that augment sensory abilitiesACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing10.1145/3386296.3386304(1-1)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3386296.3386304
Geszten DHámornik BHercegfi K(2020)Empirical study of Team Usability Testing: a laboratory experimentCognition, Technology & Work10.1007/s10111-020-00647-823:4(755-769)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00647-8
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings
1. Information systems
  1. World Wide Web
    1. Web applications
      1. Internet communications tools

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

CSCW '88: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work

January 1988

395 pages

ISBN:0897912829

DOI:10.1145/62266

Chairman:
Irene Greif
Lotus Development Corp., Cambridge, MA

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 1988

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

CSCW88

Sponsor:

Lotus Development
Xerox Corp.
SIGCHI
SIGGROUP

CSCW88: Computer Supported Cooperative Work

September 26 - 28, 1988

Oregon, Portland, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

141
Total Citations
View Citations
1,233
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)76
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Chen LLiang HWang JQu YYue Y(2021)On the Use of Large Interactive Displays to Support Collaborative Engagement and Visual Exploratory TasksSensors10.3390/s2124840321:24(8403)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248403
Findlater LGoodman SZhao YAzenkot SHanley M(2020)Fairness issues in AI systems that augment sensory abilitiesACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing10.1145/3386296.3386304(1-1)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3386296.3386304
Geszten DHámornik BHercegfi K(2020)Empirical study of Team Usability Testing: a laboratory experimentCognition, Technology & Work10.1007/s10111-020-00647-823:4(755-769)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00647-8
Hackett JHutton G(2019)Call-by-need is clairvoyant call-by-valueProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/33417183:ICFP(1-23)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3341718
Scrivener SClark SClarke AConnolly JGarner SPalmén HSmyth MSchappo A(2018)Real-Time Communication between Dispersed Work Groups via Speech and DrawingComputer-Supported Cooperative Work10.4324/9780429462276-4(51-65)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2018
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462276-4
Smith HNeff MMandryk RHancock MPerry MCox A(2018)Communication Behavior in Embodied Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3173863(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3173574.3173863
Parkinson MVytiniotis DVaswani KCosta MDeligiannis PMcDermott DBlankstein ABalkind J(2017)Project snowflake: non-blocking safe manual memory management in .NETProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/31418791:OOPSLA(1-25)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3141879
Hong CSpence INikolopoulos D(2017)GPU Virtualization and Scheduling MethodsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/306828150:3(1-37)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3068281
Al-Helali BMahmoud S(2017)Arabic Online Handwriting Recognition (AOHR)ACM Computing Surveys10.1145/306062050:3(1-35)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3060620
Vasantha GRamesh HSugavanam CChakrabarti ACorney JWodehouse A(2017)Interactional Differences and Effects Between Collocated and Distributed DesignResearch into Design for Communities, Volume 110.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_80(933-944)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_80
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Technical Drawing 101 with AutoCAD 2016

Drawing and Detailing with SolidWorks 2010

Drawing and Detailing with SolidWorks 2008

Comments

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Upcoming Conference

Other Metrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Cited By

PDF

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Technical Drawing 101 with AutoCAD 2016

Drawing and Detailing with SolidWorks 2010

Drawing and Detailing with SolidWorks 2008

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations