Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Learning effect in multinational diffusion of consumer durables: An exploratory investigation

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Literature reflects that a product/technological innovation introduced later in a country results in faster diffusion as the consumers in the lag market have an opportunity to learn about the new product from the consumers in the lead market. A systematic understanding of the learning that takes place between consumers in two countries—a pair of lead and lag countries—can provide insights for a firm’s international market entry decisions. To provide a richer understanding of the underlying structure and patterns that govern this process, propositions linking factors (country characteristics, product/innovation characteristics, and time lag) to the learning process are drawn. Subsequently, these propositions are tested through an empirical investigation of the diffusion patterns of four consumer innovations in multiple European countries. The findings help provide some preliminary guidelines for manufacturers regarding selection of foreign markets and the timing and order-of-entry decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass, M. Frank. 1969. “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables.”Management Science 18 (January): 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Lawrence A. 1981.Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, P. Louis and S. Sengupta. 1993. “The Co-Diffusion of Complementary Innovations: Supermarket Scanners and UPC Symbols.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 10:148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Samuel C., Susan P. Douglas, and Andreas Grein. 1992. “Patterns of Convergence and Divergence Among Industrialized Nations: 1960–1988.”Journal of International Business Studies 23:773–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, Mary Dee and James W. Gentry. 1983. “Characteristics of Adopters and Non-Adopters of Home Computers.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (September): 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Susan P. and Samuel C. Craig. 1992. “Advances in International Marketing.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 9:291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, Jehoshua and Kris Helsen. 1994. “Modeling Lead/Lag Phenomena in Global Marketing: The Case of VCRs.” Working paper, Hongkong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Marketing Data and Statistics. 1984–1993. London: Euromonitor.

  • Ganesh, Jaishankar and V. Kumar. 1996. “Capturing the Cross-National Learning Effect: An Analysis of an Industrial Technology Diffusion.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (Fall): 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1985. “A Prepositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 11 (March): 849–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, Jehoshua Eliashberg, and Thomas S. Robertson 1989. “Modeling Multinational Diffusion Patterns: An Efficient Methodology.”Marketing Science 8 (Summer): 231–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, James D. and James E. Hansz. 1972. “Environmental Determinants of Overseas Market Entry Strategies.”Journal of International Business Studies 3 (Spring): 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerstrand, T. 1967.Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeler, Roger M. and Thomas P. Hustad. 1980. “Problems in Predicting New Product Growth for Consumer Durables.”Management Science 26 (10): 1007–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, Kristiaan, Kamel Jedidi, and Wayne S. DeSarbo. 1993. “A New Approach to Country Segmentation Utilizing Multinational Diffusion Patterns.”Journal of Marketing 57 (October): 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1980.Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1983. “The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories.”Journal of International Business Studies 14 (Fall): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and J. E. Vahlne. 1977. “The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment.”Journal of International Business Studies 8 (Spring/Summer): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and F. Wiedersheim-Paul. 1975. “The Internationalization of the Firm—Four Swedish Cases.”Journal of Management Studies 12:305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, Shlomo, Vijay Mahajan, and Eitan Muller. 1995. “Waterfall and Sprinkler New-Product Strategies in Competitive Global Markets.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 12:105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce and Harbir Singh. 1988. “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode.”Journal of International Business Studies 19 (Fall): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Chol. 1991. “Determinants of National Innovativeness and International Market Segmentation.”International Marketing Review 8:39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liander, Bertil, Vern Terpstra, Michael Yoshino, and A. A. Sherbini. 1967.Comparative Analysis for International Marketing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Eitan Muller, and Frank M. Bass. 1990. “New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research.”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— and Robert A. Peterson. 1979. “Integrating Time and Space in Technological Substitution Models.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change 14 (August): 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin. 1993. “The Diffusion of Flexible Manufacturing Systems in Japan, Europe and the United States.”Management Science 39 (2): 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullor-Sebastian, Alicia. 1983. “The Product Life Cycle Theory: Empirical Evidence.”Journal of International Business Studies 14 (Winter): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehrt, Lee C., J. Frederick Truitt, and Richard W. Wright. 1970.International Business Research: Past, Present and Future. Bloomington: Indiana University, Bureau of Business Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, John and Frank M. Bass. 1987. “A Diffusion Theory Model of Adoption and Substitution for Successive Generations of High-Technology Products.”Management Science 33:1069–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, Kenichi. 1985.The Triad Power. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Nicolas and Jean-Emile Denis. 1988. “Inventory, Taxonomy and Assessment of Methods for International Market Selection.”International Marketing Review 5 (3): 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. Philip. 1994. “Aggregate Diffusion Forecasting Models in Marketing: A Critical Review.”International Journal of Forecasting 10:353–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert A. and Vijay Mahajan. 1978. “Multi-Product Growth Models.” InResearch in Marketing. Ed. Jagdish Sheth. Greenwich, CT: Jai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommer, D. Michael, Eric N. Berkowitz, and John R. Walton. 1980. “UPC Scanning: An Assessment of Shopper Response to Technological Change.”Journal of Retailing 56 (Summer): 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas S. 1971.Innovative Behavior and Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and Hubert Gatignon. 1986. “Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion.”Journal of Marketing 50 (July): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1983.Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roselius, Ted. 1971. “Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods.”Journal of Marketing 35 (January): 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V. and Charlotte H. Mason. 1986. “Nonlinear Least Squares Estimation of New Product Diffusion Models.”Marketing Science 5 (Spring): 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, Fareena, John U. Farley, and Donald R. Lehmann. 1990. “A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (February): 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takada, Hirokazu and Dipak Jain. 1991. “Cross-National Analysis of Diffusion of Consumer Durable Goods in Pacific Rim Countries.”Journal of Marketing 55 (April): 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, Raymond. 1966. “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (May): 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Louis T., Jr. 1968. “A Product Life Cycle for International Trade.”Journal of Marketing 32 (July): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedersheim-Paul, F., H. C. Olson, and L. S. Welch. 1976. “Pre-Export Activity: The First Step in Internationalization.”Journal of International Business Studies 9:47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Lynn and John A. Norton. 1989. “Optimal Entry Timing for a Product Line Extension.”Marketing Science 8 (Winter): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. Richard and David A. Ricks. 1994. “Trends in International Business Research: Twenty-Five Years Later.”Journal of International Business Studies 25 (4): 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He received his Ph.D. from the University of Houston in 1995. His research interests include global competition and marketing strategy, brand equity and brand extensions, customer satisfaction and brand loyalty, and issues pertaining to product development and introduction.

He has been recognized with numerous teaching and research excellence awards and has published numerous articles in many scholarly journals in marketing and forecasting. He has coauthored the textbookMarketing Research and is currently working on a book titledInternational Marketing Research, which is based on his marketing research experience across the globe. He is on the editorial review board of many journals and has lectured on marketing-related topics in various universities worldwide. His research interests include developing forecasting models, international marketing strategy and research issues, models for sales promotions, and new methodologies for product positioning and market segmentation.

His research interests focus on marketing strategy and international marketing. He has published articles and presented at conferences on research in his area of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganesh, J., Kumar, V. & Subramaniam, V. Learning effect in multinational diffusion of consumer durables: An exploratory investigation. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 25, 214–228 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397253003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397253003

Keywords