- Review
- Open access
- Published:
The prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Parasites & Vectors volume 16, Article number: 207 (2023)
Abstract
Background
Dirofilariasis, the disease caused by Dirofilaria spp., and in particular by Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in canines, occurs frequently in canids and felids, and occasionally in humans, in temperate, sub-tropical and tropical regions globally. Although highly effective, safe and convenient preventive medicines have been available for the treatment of dirofilariasis for the past three decades, the disease remains a major veterinary and public health concern in endemic areas. The insect vectors, host-parasite relationships and interactions of Dirofilaria spp. have received little attention in China, and there is very little information in English regarding the prevalence of dirofilariasis in animals and humans in the country. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the status of canine dirofilariasis in China based on the available literature in English and in Chinese.
Methods
We systematically searched five databases for epidemiologic studies on the prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in China and finally selected 42 studies eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model in the meta package in R v4.2.1.
Results
The random effects model gave a pooled and weighted prevalence of Dirofilaria infection among dogs in China in the past 100 years of 13.8% (2896/51,313, 95% confidence interval 8.2–20.4%) with a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 99.5%).
Conclusions
Our analyses indicated that the prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in China has gradually declined, but that the range of Dirofilaria spp. has expanded. Older and outdoor dogs presented a higher rate of positive infection. The findings indicated that more attention should be paid to host factors for the effective control and management of this disease.
Graphical Abstract
Background
Dirofilariasis is mainly caused by the parasitic nematodes Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens, which are transmitted by different species of culicid mosquitoes (Culex spp., Aedes spp., Anopheles spp.), the vectors that allow these nematodes to complete their life cycles [20]. Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens infect canines, felines and other animals, including humans, mostly in temperate, sub-tropical and tropical areas worldwide. In dogs, the adult D. immitis worms are located in the pulmonary arteries and right ventricle, and are capable of causing life-threatening cardiopulmonary disease [12]. Adult D. repens worms are found in subcutaneous tissues and subconjunctival, pulmonary and peri-muscular connective fascia in dogs; in most cases infection is asymptomatic, although some infections give rise to subcutaneous nodules and allergic dermatitis [1, 16]. In the majority of cases of D. repens infections in humans, individuals present with nodules in the tissues [13, 54]. Both D. immitis and D. repens are of worldwide concern as they are considered to be agents of human dirofilariasis [10, 25, 47]. Most epidemiological studies on dirofilariasis in dogs and cats, and also on human cases of the disease, have been carried out in the USA, Japan, Europe, Russia and Australia. The usual definitive hosts of Dirofilaria spp. are primarily wild and domestic canids, and the prevalence of canine dirofilariasis has been increasing in the past 10 years in countries that were previously considered non-endemic. Various factors, such as environmental and climatic changes, an increase in mosquito populations, and more human and animal movement, have favored the recent increase in infections in regions where the parasites were previously endemic, and also their spread to geographic areas which were previously free of canine infections [34].
Canine dirofilariasis is endemic in China. Faust first reported heartworm infections in dogs in China in 1921 [11]. A few researchers continued the study of heartworm, but mainly focused on its epidemiology. Data on the prevalence and spread of canine heartworm infections in China have been reported in the Chinese literature in several studies, but reports on Dirofilaria infection in China are very scarce in the international literature. To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few epidemiological surveys on D. immitis in China, while for D. repens, there are only a few case reports of human infections. The main objectives of this systematic review were to summarize the available data on the epidemiology of canine Dirofilaria infections in China using a meta-analysis and to further examine the possible causes of documented changes in the occurrence and distribution of the disease.
Methods
The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses [37] were strictly adhered to for the systematic review and meta-analysis presented here.
Literature search strategy
All the articles were retrieved from major databases that predominantly include publications in the English language (PubMed and Web of Science) or in the Chinese language (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, database of Chinses Science and Technology Periodicals, and Wan Fang database) using medical subject heading terms and corresponding keywords such as “prevalence,” “dirofilariasis,” “Dirofilaria immitis,” “Dirofilaria repens,” and “China”. The keywords “parasite” and “worm” were also searched for, and the references of the published articles were also checked for any additional useful information.
Selection criteria, quality assessment and data extraction
All cross-sectional studies based on the prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in China published before December 2022 with full-text accessibility were separately evaluated by two reviewers, and any contradictions with respect to the selection process were resolved by a third reviewer; thus there were three reviewers in all. The extracted data included the details of the authors, sampling locations, sampling times, sample sizes, prevalence, diagnostic tests and risk factors.
A scoring approach was used to assessed the quality of the papers. One point was given when the study met the following criteria and zero points were given if it did not: (1) complete information of the study, (2) a detailed materials and methods section, (3) random sampling, (4) sampling period within a given time span, (5) data analysis included, (6) missing data discussed, and (7) an analysis of risk factors [69]. The highest possible score was seven, and articles awarded five points or more were considered to be of high quality.
Statistical analysis
Double-arcsine transformation was used to convert prevalence to meet the conditions of a normal distribution, and forest plots were used for data visualization. Cochran’s Q and the I2 index were used to assess data heterogeneity among studies. As there was high heterogeneity, with I2-values above 75%, a random effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis. To assess the possible causes of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis was performed according to region, province, sampling time, quality score and latitude. A funnel plot and a trim-and-fill analysis were performed to check for publication bias based on Egger’s test [9]. The association between Dirofilaria infection and possible risk factors was estimated via odds ratio (OR) as follows: age (< 3 years compared to > 3 years), sex (female compared to male), management practice (dogs kept indoors compared to outdoors) and breed (purebred compared to crossbreed). A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The meta-analysis was performed using R v4.2.1 and the meta package.
Results
Literature search and eligible studies
A total of 335 articles were retrieved using the literature search strategy, of which only 42 eligible studies were used in the meta-analysis. These comprised 16 articles in English and 26 articles in Chinese (Fig. 1; Additional file 2: Table S1; Additional file 3: Table S2) [33, 43, 50, 51, 62, 66, 76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. According to the quality assessment, 26 were allocated five or more points, and were thus considered of high quality, and 16 were allocated five or fewer points, and were thus considered of low quality (Additional file 2: Table S1).
Meta-analysis and prevalence assessment
The random effect model gave a pooled and weighted prevalence of Dirofilaria infection among dogs in China of 13.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2–20.4%] with high heterogeneity Q = 9051.95, P = 0, I2 = 99.5%). A total of 51,313 dogs were investigated for dirofilariasis, of which 2896 were positive for Dirofilaria infection (Fig. 2). Both the funnel plots and the trim-and-fill analysis indicated a publication bias in the meta-analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S1A, C), with Egger’s test showing a significant publication bias (Egger’s bias = 10.8474, P = 0.0001; Additional file 1: Figure S1B). However, no individual study significantly affected the pooled prevalence according to the sensitivity analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S1D).
Meta-analysis
There were difference in prevalence between different region subgroups in China (P = 0.0703). The lowest prevalence was in northwestern China (6/944, 1.1%, 95% CI 0.0–9.2%) and the highest in southwestern China (222/1303, 22.8%, 95% CI 8.9–40.5%; Fig. 3).
Significant differences were observed in prevalences between different provinces or cities in China (P < 0.0001), and these had a wide range (0.0–59.4%). The prevalence was lowest in Anhui (0/4, 0.0%, 95% CI 0.0–38.9%), followed by Gansu (0/204, 0.0%, 95% CI 0.0–1.0%) and then Xinjiang (0/154, 0.0%, 95% CI 0.0–1.2%), and highest in Sichuan (78/193, 59.4%, 95% CI 18.9−93.7%; Figs. 3, 4).
The rate of positive heartworm infection in dogs gradually decreased over time (P = 0.0639; Fig. 3). Prevalence was 22.7% before 2000 (1336/5140, 95% CI 11.4–36.2%), and 12.8% between 2000 and 2010 (673/32,816, 95% CI 3.8–25.7%). After 2010, the infection rate had reduced to 6.3% (887/13,357, 95% CI 1.7–13.2%).
The quality score was not an important factor with respect to prevalence (P = 0.4211; Fig. 3). The pooled rate of low-quality studies was 17.3% (400/31,355, 95%CI 6.0–32.5%), whereas the rate of high-quality studies was 11.9% (2496/19,958, 95% CI 6.3–18.8%).
The prevalence of dirofilariasis differed significantly between different thermal belts (P = 0.035; Fig. 3). Compared to the tropical (113/1710, 3.6%, 95% CI 0.7–8.1%) and temperate zones (70/906, 2.1%, 95% CI 0.0–7.2%), the subtropical zone (2713/48,697, 9.0%, 95% CI 5.0–13.7%) had the highest infection rate. According to the meta-regression, there was a relationship between geographic latitude and Dirofilaria infection (P = 0.0601; Fig. 5a). However, there was no effect of longitude on infection rate (P = 0.7225; Fig. 5b).
The subgroup analysis showed that region, province, sampling year and latitude may have been major sources of data heterogeneity.
Risk factors
Very few studies on risk factors related to Dirofilaria infection have been reported for China. The studies were mainly focused on sex, age, breed and feeding mode. The results from the meta-analysis using data from five studies confirmed that dogs older than 3 years were more susceptible to heartworm infection than dogs younger than 3 years (OR 4.48, 95% CI 2.45–8.21, P < 0.01; Fig. 6). Dogs kept outdoors were three times more susceptible to the infection than those kept indoors (OR 3.19, 95% CI 2.12–4.81, P < 0.01). Data on the association between dirofilariasis and sex were extracted from seven studies; the results of the meta-analysis did not show any significant association between them (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.83–1.12, P = 0.33). No difference was indicated between purebred and crossbreed dogs (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.16–2.49; P = 0.17).
Discussion
Despite the application of many preventive and precautionary measures, dirofilariasis continues to cause severe and fatal disease outcomes in dogs and other animals, and also affects humans due to its zoonotic nature. The infective third-stage larvae (L3) are transmitted to vertebrate hosts through the bites of infected mosquitoes, and Dirofilaria can spread into geographical areas where they have not been reported previously via these vectors [15]. As dogs are the normal definitive hosts of Dirofilaria spp., the evaluation of the infection rates of canines in a geographical area can help researchers understand the transmission of dirofilariasis and its intensity in that area.
In the Americas, several Dirofilaria species have been reported from domestic and wild mammals. Dirofilaria immitis is the most important causative agent of canine dirofilariasis, and is found in most parts of the Americas, except for Chile, French Guiana and Uruguay [7]. Its prevalence ranges from 1 to 12% in the USA, and is as high as 42% in the cities on the Gulf Coast of Mexico, 45% in Brazil, and 74% in Argentina [26,27,28, 59, 60]. In Europe, the highest prevalences have been reported in countries in the south of the continent, such as Italy (6.1%)[42], Spain (19.4%) [38] and Portugal (2.1%), which have historically been considered to be endemic/hyperendemic for dirofilariasis. An expansion of cardiopulmonary dirofilariasis in dogs toward central and northern Europe has been observed [39]. In Africa, both D. immitis and D. repens have been reported from Tunisia [46], Algeria [55] and Tanzania [40], with prevalences ranging from 1.4% to 14.5%. The presence of dirofilariasis in domestic dogs and dingoes has been well documented in Australia, where the prevalence of D. immitis was 15% in domestic dogs and 72.7% in dingoes in 2001 [49].
It has been more than 100 years since Faust first discovered Dirofilaria infections in dogs in China [11]. Although many cases of canine dirofilariasis have been reported for China, few of them were investigated epidemiologically, with reports limited to only certain regions or provinces. Thus reports and data on the prevalence of Dirofilaria infections among dogs in China are lacking. What is more, in China, epidemiological investigations have only been conducted on D. immitis, not on D. repens. To our knowledge, the meta-analysis present here is the first to summarize the pooled infection rate of canine dirofilariasis in China over the past 100 years. A total of 42 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis, through which we could retrieve data from 51,313 dogs. The pooled rate in China was found to be 13.8% (95% CI 8.2-20.4%). The prevalence, which was mainly based on data on D. immitis, was higher than the pooled rate of Dirofilaria infection among dogs in China as reported by Anvari [2], which gave a weighted prevalence of 8.8% (95% CI 2.1-19.6%). We included 26 Chinese articles in the present review, including a paper published in 1956, in which all the relevant data may have reflected the actual situation of heartworm infection in China at the time when the papers were published.
Among the seven regions of China, the prevalence of D. immitis was highest in southwest China (222/1303, 22.8%, 95% CI 8.9–40.5%), which comprises Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan and Tibet province/autonomous region. Sichuan province was found to be endemic for canine heartworm due to its climatic conditions, as they are particularly suitable for the mosquito vectors which transmit the infective L3. Moreover, in this review, Sichuan was found to have the highest infection rate of the seven regions. A prevalence of D. immitis as high as 80% was reported for Sichuan province, in Cangxi county [51]. The prevalence of D. immitis in Sichuan province has fallen to 20.3% since 2000, and the highest prevalence was found in Mianyang (21.9%) [68]. The Patriotic Health Movement initiated by the Chinese government to eliminate mosquitoes is the main reason for the decline of Dirofilaria infections in Sichuan province. Chongqing municipality, one of the four municipalities of China, is located east of Sichuan province, which is endemic for heartworm. Rao et al. [45] reported that 19 out of 31 (i.e. an infection rate of 61.3%) stray dogs sampled between 1992 and 1993 in Bishan county, Chongqing, had heartworm microfilariae as determined by microscopy. Prior to the start of the twenty-first century, dirofilariasis was prevalent throughout Guizhou province, which is located southeast of Sichuan province, due to its warm, wet climate. A survey conducted from 1993 to 1994 in Yuqing County, Guizhou province, reported an infection rate of canine heartworm of 33.3% [32]. In Guizhou province, necropsy showed that 45 out of 120 stray dogs harbored adult D. immitis worms in the right ventricle and pulmonary artery, which represented an infection rate of 37.5% [62]. A survey undertaken in 1996 in Baiyun, Yuqin, Xifeng, Leishan, Jianhe, Xingyi, Bijie, Weining and Liuzhi, which are cities/counties of Guizhou province, reported a heartworm infection rate of 14.7% [43]. In 2012, the prevalence of heartworm was 6.7% in Yunnan, where previously dirofilariasis had not been reported at all [52].
Of the 34 provinces/autonomous regions/municipalities of China, only 23 possess epidemiological data on heartworm disease, and a few, like Tibet, Qinghai, Ningxia, Shanxi, Hubei, Hebei, Shandong, and Jilin, still have no relevant data. However, a few unpublished clinical cases of D. immitis infection in dogs have been reported in these provinces/autonomous regions. There are only a few reports in the Chinese literature of clinical cases in other cities of Jilin province, such as Longjing city, Changchun city and Yushu city [35, 71]. From 2000 to 2019, six reports on heartworm infection in dogs in Shandong were published in Chinese, and comprised one case each of an infected dog in 2000 [8], 2006 [18], 2010 [23], and 2019 [30], three cases of bulldogs infected with heartworm in 2003 [73], and a number of cases of canine dirofilariasis in 2004 [65]. Furthermore, in 2007, two Manchurian tigers were found to be infected with heartworm [63]. Canine heartworm cases have been reported in Hebei province, northern China [72]. Although the available data show that the rates in Anhui, Gansu and Xinjiang were 0.0%, the CIs differed due to different sample sizes.
The prevalence of canine dirofilariasis has decreased gradually in China in the past 100 years, but the range of infections has expanded. Before 2000, dirofilariasis was mainly found in southwestern China (Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou) and eastern China (Fujian and Taiwan). Only a few scattered and sporadic studies on dirofilariasis have been carried out in central, southern and northeastern China. After 2000, canine dirofilariasis remained endemic in southern, southwestern and eastern China. The disease was also found in northwestern China, where it had not been reported before 2000. D. immitis was also found, primarily in areas in southwestern, southern, central, eastern and northeastern China, where previously only sporadic or negligible numbers of cases had been reported.
The epidemiologic data of the studies included in this review show a change in the distribution of dirofilariasis in China, which has shifted toward northwest, north and eastern China. Many factors might be responsible for this, but some in particular are thought to possibly explain the changes in the occurrence and distribution of canine dirofilariasis in China. The increasing number of dogs traveling with their holidaying owners, or dogs sold in endemic areas and brought to non-endemic areas could be key factors in the spread of infections into new areas. Taking Taiwan as an example, canine dirofilariasis was first reported there, by Miyamoto [36], when one dog imported from Mainland China and another from Japan were found to be infected, while negative results were obtained for 75 indigenous dogs. Since then, a large number of dogs have been imported from areas endemic for dirofilariasis, including the USA and Japan. Wu et al. [66] observed that, throughout Taiwan, a total of 837 stray dogs and 1228 pet dogs were infected with heartworm, and the overall heartworm-positive rate for stray dogs and pet dogs was 57% and 26.5%, respectively.
Another fundamental factor is the presence of mosquitoes that are able to act as vectors of Dirofilaria. The geographical extent of dirofilariasis is directly related to that of susceptible mosquito populations. In China, heartworm vectors include Anopheles sinensis, Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens pallens, and other species of mosquitoes [44]. Among vectors reported worldwide, An. sinensis is distributed throughout almost all of China, except for Xinjiang and Qinghai [50], and Ae. albopictus is found in 28 provinces/autonomous regions/municipalities [67]. Furthermore, the new introduction into a given area of a competent mosquito species, e.g. Ae. albopictus, may also affect dirofilariasis transmission. Previously, Ae. albopictus mainly resided south of 30° N in China, but now has a wider distribution in the country, and particularly in Liaoning, Hebei, Shanxi, Shannxi, and Tibet, where it has spread in recent years [19, 48, 67]. Its capacity to transmit infective L3 of D. immitis has been confirmed in Fujian province and some other areas of China [31].
Environmental conditions are other important factors affecting mosquito development and the distribution of dirofilariasis. The pivotal prerequisite for D. immitis transmission is a climate with a suitable temperature and humidity to support a viable mosquito population, and also maintain sufficient heat to allow the maturation of ingested microfilariae to infective L3 in the mosquitoes. Development and maturation in mosquitoes require a steady temperature in excess of 18 °C for approximately 1 month. Some new areas are becoming more suitable for vectors due to global warming and climatic change, which result in their wider geographical distribution. Large populations of mosquitoes that are able to transmit dirofilariasis, and temperatures that favor the mosquitoes and the development of infectious L3 in them, increase the risk of transmission of the disease [14] and enable the spread of vectors to new areas [39]. Our meta-regression showed a relationship between latitude and Dirofilaria infection in dogs which may be related to factors such as climatic conditions or differences in the nutritional and health management of the animals. Dogs in the highlands of western China are used for herding, while dogs on the plains of northern China are used for hunting, and their living conditions and care are worse than those of guard dogs and pet dogs in central and southern China.
Current research on risk factors related to canine dirofilariasis is mainly focused on factors related to the parasites and their vectors. High-quality surveillance data on mosquitoes are notoriously difficult to acquire. Vegetation indices and meteorological data are used as surrogates when mapping the abundances of these mosquito vector species. As the ambient air temperatures experienced by the mosquito vectors affect heartworm transmission, these can be used to predict dog and heartworm vector competence. As the relationships between environmental conditions and Dirofilaria infection are the main focus of current research, more attention needs to be paid to host factors. In the present review, age and care of dogs were found to be important factors affecting the infection rate of heartworm. Older dogs had a higher positive rate and were more likely to be bitten by mosquitoes carrying infective L3. This may also explain why stray dogs were more likely to be infected by heartworm. Thus, epidemiological monitoring of domestic dogs and wild canids, in addition to the care and management of dogs, is considered very important for the prevention of canine dirofilariasis.
Although D. immitis is most commonly found in dogs in China, the level of D. immitis infection in cats should also be taken into consideration. A study reported D. immitis prevalence of 3.0% in cats in Gansu, northwestern China [6], Kang et al. [24] reported 1.9% prevalence in stray cats from Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, and Shandong, and another study reported an average prevalence of D. immitis of 4.5% in cats in Liaoning [17]. The overall prevalence of antibody-positive cats was found to be 6.7% in Taiwan in 2017 [33]. D. immitis can also infect other mammals, such as foxes, red pandas, leopards, white-lipped deer, giant pandas and hog deer [4, 74, 75].
Although humans are not natural hosts of Dirofilaria spp., a few human cases of Dirofilaria infection have been reported [3], mostly in the USA and Europe. Human cases have also been reported in China, most of which were attributed to D. repens, although other Dirofilaria spp. may also infect and cause disease in humans. In 1980, Huang et al. [22] reported two human cases in Heilongjiang province, China, where D. repens had infected the eyes. In 1986, Zhang [70] reported one human case of D. repens infection in subcutaneous tissue. In 1987, Sun [53] reported one human case of an eye infected with D. repens in Heilongjiang province. Two cases of D. repens infection in the breast in adult females residing in Hong Kong were reported in 2002 [41]. A case of dirofilariasis affecting the buccal mucosa was reported in a non-endemic area of southern China [56]. Two cases of human pulmonary dirofilariasis have been reported in Taiwan [58]. In 2005, Wang and Cui [64] reported two cases of D. immitis infection in humans. Huang et al. [21] reported one human case of subcutaneous dirofilariasis caused by D. immitis in Taiwan. To et al. [57] reported the detection of a novel species, “Candidatus Dirofilaria hongkongensis,” which was responsible for three cases of human dirofilariasis in Hong Kong. Cheung et al. [5] reported that a patient was diagnosed with Dirofilaria infection from a subcutaneous nodule on the right thigh. In 2013, Li [29] reported one case of human pulmonary dirofilariasis concurrent with intercostal neurilemmoma in Taiwan. Considering the risk that D. repens poses to human health, an investigation of D. repens infection among dogs needs to be started immediately in China.
The limitations of this systematic review include the following: (1) only a few of the included studies had evaluated the multiple factors that influence dirofilariasis, (2) there was insufficient data from the studies for subgroup analysis, (3) epidemiological survey results were missing for some provinces and cities of China, and (4) the data were highly heterogeneous.
Conclusions
The pooled prevalence of dirofilariasis in dogs in China as determined in the meta-analysis presented here shows that the disease is widespread in the country. In the past 100 years, the prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in previously endemic and hyper-endemic areas of China has slowly decreased, but infections have spread into previously infection-free areas of the country. In addition to factors associated with the parasites and their vectors, attention should also be paid to factors that affect the canine hosts, as should the epidemiological monitoring and management of dogs. More attention should also be paid to increasing the public’s awareness of the zoonotic nature of dirofilariasis. Moreover, veterinarians need to develop more effective detection methods for the disease and take appropriate measures to prevent its spread and manage its treatment.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Agapito D, Aziz NA, Wang T, Morgan ER, Wright I. Subconjunctival Dirofilaria repens infection in a dog resident in the UK. J Small Anim Pract. 2018;59:50–2.
Anvari D, Narouei E, Daryani A, et al. The global status of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on published articles. Res Vet Sci. 2020;131:104–16.
Balendran T, Yatawara L, Wickramasinghe S. Human dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria repens in Sri Lanka from 1962 to 2020. Acta Parasitol. 2022;67:628–39.
Chen Z, Li S. Diagnosis of heartworm in foxes. Chin J Vet Sci Technol. 1996;26:20.
Cheung BM, Huang YL, Lin YW, Chang YS, Liu SM. An unexpected cause of a subcutaneous nodule: a case report of Dirofilaria infection. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2012;2012:191245.
Cong W, Meng QF, Blaga R, Villena I, Zhu XQ, Qian AD. Toxoplasma gondii, Dirofilaria immitis, feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), and feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infections in stray and pet cats (Felis catus) in northwest China: co-infections and risk factors. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:217–23.
Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Dirofilariasis in the Americas: a more virulent Dirofilaria immitis? Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:288.
Du G. The report of diagnosis and treatment of canine dirofilariasis. Shandong J Anim Sci Vet Med. 2011;32:91–2.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.
Falidas E, Gourgiotis S, Ivopoulou O, Koutsogiannis I, Oikonomou C, Vlachos K, et al. Human subcutaneous dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria immitis in a Greek adult. J Infect Public Health. 2016;9:102–4.
Faust EC. Preliminary survey of the parasites of vertebrate of north China. China Med J. 1921;35:196–210.
Ferreira C, Afonso A, Calado M, Maurício I, Alho AM, Meireles J, et al. Molecular characterization of Dirofilaria spp. circulating in Portugal. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:250.
GheorghiŢă MI, ForŢofoiu MC, Dumitrescu CI, Dumitrescu D, Camen A, Mărgăritescu C. Intramuscular human Dirofilaria repens infection of the temporal region-case report and review of the literature. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58:585–92.
Grieve RB, Lok JB, Glickman LT. Epidemiology of canine heartworm infection. Epidemiol Rev. 1983;5:220–46.
Guerrero J, McCall JW, Genchi C, Bazzocchi C, Kramer L, Simòn F, et al. Recent advances in heartworm disease. Vet Parasitol. 2004;125:105–30.
Gunathilaka N, Siriwardana S, Wijesooriya L, Gunaratne G, Perera N. Subcutaneous dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens in Sri Lanka: a potential risk of transmitting human dirofilariasis. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2017;5:2050313X17701373.
Hou H, Cao L, Ren W, Wang D, Ding H, You J, et al. Seroprevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in cats from Liaoning province northeastern China. Korean J Parasitol. 2017;55:673–7.
Hou XT, Xu L. Diagnosis and treatment of canine dirofilariasis. Chin J Vet Med. 2019;12:82–3.
Huang G, Li H, Zhao Y, Wang X, Chang M. The first investigation on distribution of dengue vector Aedes albopictus in north and northwest of Hebei province. Chin J Vector Biol Control. 2007;450–452.
Huang S, Smith DJ, Molaei G, Andreadis TG, Larsen SE, Lucchesi EF. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) infection in Aedes, Culex, and Culiseta mosquitoes from north San Joaquin Valley. CA J Med Entomol. 2013;50:1315–23.
Huang SL, Liu YH, Chen W. Subcutaneous dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria immitis mimicking a large epidermal cyst. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:477–8.
Huang SY. The first observation of a parasite, Dirofilaria repens, in the human eye in China. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1980;16:62–3.
Jian S, Du G, Liu H. The report of diagnosis and treatment of canine dirofilariasis. Chin J Vet Med. 2002;38:41.
Kang YH, Cong W, Qin SY, Shan XF, Gao YH, Wang CF, et al. First report of Toxoplasma gondii, Dirofilaria immitis, and Chlamydia felis infection in stray and companion cats in northeastern and eastern China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016;16:654–8.
Krstić M, Gabrielli S, Ignjatović M, Savić S, Cancrini G, Ranđelović G, et al. An appraisal of canine and human cases reveals an endemic status of dirofilariasis in parts of Serbia. Mol Cell Probes. 2017;31:37–41.
Labarthe N, Ferreira AM, Guerrero J, Newcomb K, Paes-de-Almeida E. Survey of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) in random source cats in metropolitan Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, with descriptions of lesions. Vet Parasitol. 1997;71:301–6.
Labarthe N, Guerrero J. Epidemiology of heartworm: what is happening in South America and Mexico? Vet Parasitol. 2005;133:149–56.
Lee AC, Montgomery SP, Theis JH, Blagburn BL, Eberhard ML. Public health issues concerning the widespread distribution of canine heartworm disease. Trends Parasitol. 2010;26:168–73.
Li CY, Chang YL, Lee YC. Human pulmonary dirofilariasis coexisting with intercostal neurilemmoma: a case report and literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112:644–7.
Li G. A case report on the prevention and treatment of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs. Chin J Anim Quarantine. 2006;23:40.
Lin G, Wang G. Morphological comparison of 5 filarial larvae species in mosquito in Fujian province. Fujian Med J. 1983;27–29.
Liu K, Mao Y, Yuan Z, Gao M, Mao G. The investigation of canine’s parasitic fauna at Yuqing county. Guizhou Anim Sci Vet Med. 1995;19.
Lu TL, Wong JY, Tan TL, Hung YW. Prevalence and epidemiology of canine and feline heartworm infection in Taiwan. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:484.
McCall JW, Genchi C, Kramer LH, Guerrero J, Venco L. Heartworm disease in animals and humans. Adv Parasitol. 2008;66:193–285.
Meng Z, Yan H, Duan J, Zhang Y. The diagnosis and treatment of canine dirofilariasis in dogs. Jilin Anim Husb Vet Med. 2013;34:62.
Miyamoto S, Uchida CH. Uber Filaria immitis bei Hunden in Formosa. J Formos Med Assoc. 1935;34:448–51.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
Montoya-Alonso JA, Carretón E, Juste MC, Mellado I, Morchón R, Simón F. Epidemiological survey of canine heartworm disease on the island of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands—Spain) between 2000 and 2008. Vet Parasitol. 2010;173:165–8.
Morchón R, Carretón E, González-Miguel J, Mellado-Hernández I. Heartworm disease (Dirofilaria immitis) and their vectors in Europe—new distribution trends. Front Physiol. 2012;3:196.
Mukendi JP, Kimbita E, Mbanzulu KM, Maindo PP, Misinzo G. Morphological and molecular detection of canine dirofilarial species of veterinary and medical importance in Morogoro municipality, Tanzania. Vet Parasitol. 2016;220:1–3.
Ng WK, Siu TH, Fung B, Kong JH. Dirofilariasis of breast: report of two cases diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;26:22–5.
Piccinini G, Carreri L. An epidemiologic assessment of canine heartworm in northern Italy. Proceedings of the 13th Triennial State of the Heartworm Symposium, Memphis, 2010, 41–42.
Qian DX, Du YP, Mao YX, Zeng H, He DG, Xiao YN, et al. The investigation of canine’s parasitic fauna in Guizhou province. Chin J Vet Sci Technol. 1996;26:14–5.
Quan B. The report of canine dirofilariasis. Chin J Vet Med. 2004;40:50–2.
Rao Z, Zhang F, Ye H. Investigation on domestic dogs infected with Dirofilaria immitis in Bishan county Chongqing municipality. Sichuan J Zoo. 1999;18:54.
Rjeibi MR, Rouatbi M, Mabrouk M, Tabib I, Rekik M, Gharbi M. Molecular study of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in dogs from Tunisia. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017;64:1505–9.
Rossi A, Peix Á, Pavlikovskaya T, Sagach O, Nikolaenko S, Chizh N, et al. Genetic diversity of Dirofilaria spp. isolated from subcutaneous and ocular lesions of human patients in Ukraine. Acta Trop. 2015;142:1–4.
Shi Y, Zhang J. Preliminary investigation on geographic distribution of Aedes albopictus in northwest China. Chin J Hygienic Insecticides Equip. 2012;420–421.
Smout FA, Skerratt LF, Butler JR, Johnson CN, Congdon BC. Dingoes (Canis dingo Meyer, 1793) continue to be an important reservoir host of Dirofilaria immitis in low density housing areas in Australia. Vet Parasitol. 2016;215:6–10.
Song W. Advances in mosquito vector research in China over the past 50 years. Med Ind Inf. 2005;57–58.
Sun J. Investigation of parasites on domestic dog, livestock and poultry at Cangxi county Sichuan province. Chin J Zoo. 1987;3:58.
Sun M, Zhuo W, Guo S, Liao S, Shi D, Liu J, et al. Serological survey of canine dirofilariasis in Chongqing, Kunming, Nanchang, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Nanning in southern China. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:225–8.
Sun X, Huang S, Huo B, Sun L. A case of the ocular Dirofilaria repens. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis. 1987;05:45.
Suzuki J, Kobayashi S, Okata U, Matsuzaki H, Mori M, Chen KR, et al. Molecular analysis of Dirofilaria repens removed from a subcutaneous nodule in a Japanese woman after a tour to Europe. Parasite. 2015;22:2.
Tahir D, Damene H, Davoust B, Parola P. First molecular detection of Dirofilaria immitis (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) infection in dogs from northern Algeria. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;51:66–8.
To EW, Tsang WM, Chan KF. Human dirofilariasis of the buccal mucosa: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:104–6.
To KK, Wong SS, Poon RW, Trendell-Smith NJ, Ngan AH, Lam JW, et al. A novel Dirofilaria species causing human and canine infections in Hong Kong. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3534–41.
Tsung SH, Liu CC. Human pulmonary dirofilariasis in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2003;102:42–5.
Vezzani D, Carbajo AE, Fontanarrosa MF, Scodellaro CF, Basabe J, Cangiano G, et al. Epidemiology of canine heartworm in its southern distribution limit in South America: risk factors, inter-annual trend and spatial patterns. Vet Parasitol. 2011;176:240–9.
Vezzani D, Eiras DF, Wisnivesky C. Dirofilariasis in Argentina: historical review and first report of Dirofilaria immitis in a natural mosquito population. Vet Parasitol. 2006;136:259–73.
Vieira L, Silvestre-Ferreira AC, Fontes-Sousa AP, Balreira AC, Morchón R, Carretón E, et al. Seroprevalence of heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in feline and canine hosts from central and northern Portugal. J Helminthol. 2015;89:625–9.
Wang D, Liu X, Han X. Investigation of helminth on dogs and cats in Guizhou province. Chin J Vet Sci Technol. 1995;25:13–5.
Wang YY. Diagnosis and treatment of canine dirofilariasis in Panthera tigris altaica. Chin J Vet Med. 2019;4:128.
Wang Z, Cui J. Dirofilariasis. Parasit Dis Foreign Med Sci. 2005;32:53–60.
Wang Z. Diagnosis and treatment on canine distemper concurrent with canine dirofilariasis. Shandong J Anim Sci Vet Med. 2004;49–50.
Wu CC, Fan PC. Prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in Taiwan. J Helminthol. 2003;77:83–8.
Yang SR, Liu QY. Trend in global distribution and spread of Aedes albopictus. Chin J Vector Biol Control. 2013;24:1–4.
Ye Q, Chen T. Survey on infection rate of canine heartworms in working dogs of Sichuan province. J Gansu Sci. 2012;24:39–41.
Ying Z, Zhu ZF, Yang X, Liu J, Liu Q. Prevalence and associated risk factors of Neospora caninum infection among cattle in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Vet Med. 2022;201:105593.
Zhang W, Zhang Y. One case of subcutaneous filariasis. Chin J Zoonoses. 1986;56.
Zhang X, Xu J, Zhang Y, Wang H. Experience in the treatment of Dirofilariasis immitis in dogs. Chin Livest Poult Breed. 2010;06:79.
Zhang X. A case of failure in treatment of dirofilariasis. Mod Agric. 2013; 95.
Zhang Z, Wang J. The treatment of Dirofilaria immitis. Shandong J Anim Sci Vet Med. 2003;44–45.
Zhao B, Wang Q, Yan H, Yang G, Niu L, Deng J, et al. Investigation on protozoa and Dirofilaria immitis infections for wild animals in Chengdu Zoo. Chin Vet Sci. 2009;39:277–82.
Zhong ZJ, Huang XM, Yang Y, Wu KJ, Xu XY, Cao XF, et al. Serology analysis of brucellosis, toxoplasmosis and heartworm in giant pandas. Sichuan Anim. 2014;33–06:836–9.
Chen A, Liu X. A survey of canine parasites in Guangzhou and its vicinity. Anim Husb Vet Med. 1992;5:217–8.
Chen H. Investigation on common diseases of dogs from Shaoxing city. Zhejiang J Anim Sci Vet Med. 2012;37:40–1.
Chen S, Zhang Y. Investigation and study on zoonosis in domestic dogs. J Hengyang Med Coll. 1996;04:277–8+284.
Chou CH, Yeh TM, Lu YP, Shih WL, Chang CD, Chien CH, et al. Prevalence of zoonotic pathogens by molecular detection in stray dogs in central Taiwan. Thai J Vet Med. 2014;4:363–75.
Dong JY, Xie WD, Lou HJ, Liang CB, Zhang J, He XL. Clinical investigation of Dirofilaria immitis. Anim Husb Vet Med. 2004;07:9–11.
Fan CK, Su KE, Lin YH, Liao CW, Du WY, Chiou HY. Seroepidemiologic survey of Dirofilaria immitis infection among domestic dogs in Taipei city and mountain aboriginal districts in Taiwan (1998–1999). Vet Parasitol. 2001;102:113–20.
He GZ, Tian WY, Wang P, Wang WJ, Han J, Jian CY, et al. Development of immunochromatographic strip for detection of Dirofilaria immitis. Anim Husbandry Vet Med. 2010;42:89–91.
He HQ. Detection of microfilaria of Dirofilaria immitis in police dogs in Xi’an. Prog Vet Med. 2005;06:114–5.
Hou HL. Investigation report on canine dirofilariasis in Dandong area. Anim Husb Vet Med. 2006;11:62–3.
Lin J, Cheng Y. Investigation on parasitic helminth species of dogs and cats in Fujian province. Chin J Zoo. 1986;28–29.
Liu C, Yang N, He J, Yang M, Sun M. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Shenyang northeastern China. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51:375–7.
Liu ZL, Yang XY, Yang LR, Wuyun QQ, Cheng SY. Investigation on the species and infection of canine parasites in Hohhot. Contemp Anim Husbandry. 2005;04:39–41.
Liu K, Mao Y, Yuan Z, Gao M, Mao G. The investigation of canine’s parasitic fauna at Yuqing county. Guizhou Anim Sci Vet Med. 1995;19:16.
Quan Z, Chen B, Zhang B, Ma X, Lv C, Liang Y. Investigation on the parasite species and infection situation of 477 cases of outpatient dogs. Prog Vet Med. 2016;37:118–22.
Rao ZX, Zhang FN, Ye H. Investigation on the infection of Dirofilaria immitis in domestic dogs in Bishan county, Chongqing. Sichuan J Zool. 1999;05:58.
Shen S, Shen J. Investigation and observation of morphology on the Dirofilaria immitis in Guangdong province. J First Mil Med University. 1984;4:310–2.
Wang CR, Qiu JH, Zhao JP, Xu LM, Yu WC, Zhu XQ. Prevalence of helminthes in adult dogs in Heilongjiang province, the People’s Republic of China. Parasitol Res. 2006;99:627–30.
Wang J, Kelly P, Zhang J, Shi Z, Song C, Zheng X, et al. Detection of Dirofilaria immitis antigen and antibodies against Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi and Ehrlichia canis in dogs from ten provinces of China. Acta Parasitol. 2018;63:412–5.
Wang J, Zhu X, Ying Z, Han Q, Liao C, Wang J, et al. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infections in dogs and cats in Hainan island/province and three other coastal cities of China based on antigen testing and PCR. J Parasitol. 2019;105:199–202.
Wang LC. Canine filarial infections in north Taiwan. Acta Trop. 1997;68:115–20.
Wang S, He J, Zhang L. Serological investigation of vector-borne disease in dogs from rural areas of China. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2:102–3.
Wang S, Zhang N, Zhang Z, Wang D, Yao Z, Zhang H, et al. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs in Henan province, central China. Parasite. 2016;23:43.
Wang Y, Lou Q, Zhu D, Shi X, Liu Z. A Preliminary investigation on the parasitic infection of domestic dogs in Jingning district, Gansu province. Shanghai Lab Anim Sci. 1988;8:28–40.
Wu QL, Ding ZX, Liu ZW. Investigation of canine worms in Beijing. Acta Microbiol Sin. 1956;4:219–37.
Xia Z, Yu D, Mao J, Zhang Z, Yu J. The occurrence of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis and Anaplasma phagocytophium in dogs in China. J Helminthol. 2012;86:185–9.
Xie MQ, Wu HX, Zhang JY, Zhang FQ, Wen LN. Investigation report on canine Dirofilaria immitis and Spirocera lupi. Guangdong J Anim Vet Sci. 1992;01:38–9.
Xu D, Zhang J, Shi Z, Song C, Zheng X, Zhang Y, et al. Molecular detection of vector-borne agents in dogs from ten provinces of China. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:501.
Xu SW, Ye XH, Ma JF, Wu YF, Zhang Q. Canine ascites syndrome. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med. 1995;07:034.
Yang F. Some knowledge of canine heartworm disease. Sichuan J Zool. 2002;04:261–2.
Ye QH, Chen T. Survey on infection rate of canine heartworms in working dogs of Sichuan province. J Gansu Sci. 2012;24:39–41.
Yuasa Y, Hsu TH, Chou CC, Huang CC, Huang WC, Chang CC. The comparison of spatial variation and risk factors between mosquito-borne and tick-borne diseases: seroepidemiology of Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma species, and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;35:599–606.
Zhang J, Zhang S, Dong F. Investigation report on prevalence of canine diseases in Haidian district of Beijing in 2007. Contemp Anim Husbandry. 2008;06:45–7.
Zhang RX, Xie HY, Zeng QQ, Hong WB. Investigation report on heartworm antigens, lyme antibodies and Ehrlich antibodies in dogs in Dongguan city. Guangdong Anim Husbandry Vet Sci Technol. 2010;35:45–7.
Zhou J, Liu Z, Cheng Z. Investigation report on dog parasitic diseases in Weining county. Contemp Anim Husb. 2013;30:52–3.
Zhu XJ, Wnag JH, Liao CH, Xu YH, Han Q. DNA detection of Wolbachia-canine heartworm endosymbiont. Chinese J Vet Med. 2017;53:27–30.
Hou H, Shen G, Wu W, Gong P, Liu Q, You J, et al. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs from Dandong. China Vet Parasitol. 2011;183:189–93.
Acknowledgements
We thank the scientists and personnel of China Agricultural University and Hainan University for their collaboration.
Funding
This work was funded by the Major Science and Technology Plan of Hainan Province (ZDKJ2021035) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20363).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YZ, AU and WJH independently extracted and recorded the data from each selected study. YZ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. AU and YZ revised the manuscript. HQ and LQ designed the meta-analysis. All the authors reviewed the final manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Figure S1.
Publication bias and sensitivity analysis for the meta-analysis. A Funnel plot for the examination of publication bias, B Egger’s test for publication bias, C Funnel plot with trim-and-fill analysis of publication bias, D Sensitivity analysis of any one included study.
Additional file 2: Table S1.
Included studies on prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in China.
Additional file 3: Table S2.
Eligible data included in the study.
Additional file 4:
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist items.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Ying, Z., Upadhyay, A., Wang, J. et al. The prevalence of canine dirofilariasis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasites Vectors 16, 207 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05770-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05770-9