Abstract
A representation theorem is obtained for contraction operators that are based on Levi's recent proposal that selection functions should be applied to the set of saturatable contractions, rather than to maximal subsets as in the AGM framework. Furthermore, it is shown that Levi's proposal to base the selection on a weakly monotonic measure of informational value guarantees the satisfaction of both of Gärdenfors' supplementary postulates for contraction. These results indicate that Levi has succeeded in constructing a well-behaved operation of contraction that does not satisfy the postulate of recovery.
Citation
Sven Ove Hansson. Erik J. Olsson. "Levi Contractions and AGM Contractions: A Comparison." Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 36 (1) 103 - 119, Winter 1995. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1040308830
Information