Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1641417.1641419dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinlgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

DPOCL: a principled approach to discourse planning

Published: 21 June 1994 Publication History

Abstract

Research in discourse processing has identified two representational requirements for discourse planning systems. First, discourse plans must adequately represent the intentional structure of the utterances they produce in order to enable a computational discourse agent to respond effectively to communicative failures [15]. Second, discourse plans must represent the informational structure of utterances. In addition to these representational requirements, we argue that discourse planners should be formally characterisable in terms of soundness and completeness.

References

[1]
Douglas E. Appelt. Planning English Sentences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985.
[2]
Alison Cawsey. Explanation and Interaction: The Computer Generation of Explanatory Dialogues. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993.
[3]
David Chapman. Planning for conjunctive goals. Artificial Intelligence, 32, 1987.
[4]
Michael Elhadad and Kathleen McKeown. Generating connectives. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 97--101, Helsinki, 1990.
[5]
Richard Fikes and Nils Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. In James Allen, James Hendler, and Austin Tate, editors, Readings in Planning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.
[6]
Barbara J. Gross and Candace L. Sidner. Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175--204, 1986.
[7]
Jerry Hobbs. On the coherence and structure of discourse. Technical Report CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1985.
[8]
Eduard Hovy, Julia Lavid, Elisabeth Maier, Vibhu Mittal, and Cecile Paris. Employing knowledge resourses in a new text planner architecture. In Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Trento, Italy, 1992.
[9]
Eduard H. Hovy. Approaches to the planning of coherent text. In Cécile L. Paris, William R. Swartout, and William C. Mann, editors, Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, pages 83--102. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1991.
[10]
Lynn Lambert. Recognizing Complex Discourse Acts: A Tripartite Plan-Based Model of Dialogue. PhD thesis, University of Delaware, 1993.
[11]
Lynn Lambert and Sandra Carberry. A tripartite plan-based model of dialog. In Proceedings, Association for Computational Linguistics, 1991.
[12]
Elisabeth Maier. The extension of a text planner for the treatment of multiple links between text units. In Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, April 1993.
[13]
Mark T. Maybury. Communicative acts for explanation generation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37(2):135--172, 1992.
[14]
David McAllister and David Rosenblit. Systematic nonlinear planning. In Proceedings of AAAI, 1991.
[15]
Johanna D. Moore and Cécile L. Paris. Planning text for advisory dialogues: Capturing intentional and rhetorical information. Computational Linguistics, 19(4):651--695, 1993.
[16]
Johanna D. Moore and Martha E. Pollack. A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):537--544, 1992.
[17]
Scott Penberthy and Daniel Weld. UCPOP: A sound, complete partial order planner for adl. In Proceedings of the Knowledge Representation Conference, 1991.
[18]
Martha E. Pollack. The uses of plans. Artificial Intelligence, 57:43--68, 1992.
[19]
Dietmar Rosner and Manfred Stede. Customizing RST for the automatic production of technical manuals. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rosner, and O. Stock, editors, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 199--215, Berlin, 1992. Springer-Verlag.
[20]
Earl Sacerdoti. A Structure for Plans and Behavior. PhD thesis, Stanford University Department of Computer Science, 1975.
[21]
Donia Scott and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, and M. Zock, editors, Current Research in Natural Language Generation, pages 47--73. Academic Press, New York, 1990.
[22]
Keith Vander Linden, Susanna Cumming, and James Martin. Expressing local rhetorical relations in instructional text. Technical Report 92--43, U. of Colorado, 1992.
[23]
Q. Yang. Formalizing planning knowledge for a hierarchical planner. Computational Intelligence, 6, 1990.
[24]
R. Michael Young, Johanna D. Moore, and Martha E. Pollack. Towards a principled representation for discourse plans. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1994.
[25]
R. Michael Young, Martha E. Pollack, and Johanna D. Moore. Decomposition and causality in partial order planning. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI and Planning Systems, 1994.

Cited By

View all
  • (2006)Representational requirements for a plan based approach to automated camera controlProceedings of the Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment10.5555/3023108.3023115(36-41)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2006
  • (2006)Generating and evaluating evaluative argumentsArtificial Intelligence10.5555/1163940.1644556170:11(925-952)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006
  • (2005)A discourse planning approach to cinematic camera control for narratives in virtual environmentsProceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 110.5555/1619332.1619383(307-312)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2005

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
INLG '94: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation
June 1994
264 pages

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 1994

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2006)Representational requirements for a plan based approach to automated camera controlProceedings of the Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment10.5555/3023108.3023115(36-41)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2006
  • (2006)Generating and evaluating evaluative argumentsArtificial Intelligence10.5555/1163940.1644556170:11(925-952)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006
  • (2005)A discourse planning approach to cinematic camera control for narratives in virtual environmentsProceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 110.5555/1619332.1619383(307-312)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2005

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media