Abstract
Four experiments investigated the perception of correlations from scatterplots. All graphic properties, other than error variance, that have been shown to affect subjective but not objective correlation(r) were held constant. Participants in Experiment 1 ranked 21 scatterplots according to the magnitude ofr. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants made yes/no judgments to indicate whether a scatterplot was high (signal) or low (noise). Values ofr for signal and noise scatterplots varied across participants. Differences between correlations for signal and for noise scatterplots were constant inr in Experiment 2, and constant inr2 in Experiment 3. Standard deviations of the ranks in Experiment 1 and ď values in Experiments 2 and 3 showed that discriminability increased with the magnitude ofr. In Experiment 4, faculty and graduate students in psychology and sociology made point estimates ofr for single scatterplots. Estimates were negatively accelerated functions of objective correlation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bobko, P., &Karren, R. (1979). The perception of Pearson product moment correlations from bivariate scatterplots.Personnel Psychology,32, 313–325.
Boynton, D. M. (2000). The psychophysics of informal covariation asjudgments sessment: Perceiving randomness against a background of dispersion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 867–876.
Cleveland, W. S., Diaconis, P., &McGill, R. (1982). Variables on scatterplots look more highly correlated when the scales are increased.Science,216, 1138–1141.
Collyer, C. E., Stanley, K. A., &Bowater, C. (1990). Psychology of the scientist: LXIII. Perceiving scattergrams: Is visual line fitting related to estimation of the correlation coefficient?Perceptual & Motor Skills,71, 371–378.
Garner, W. R, Hake, H. W., &Eriksen, C. W. (1956). Operationism and the concept of perception.Psychological Review,63, 149–159.
Guilford, J. P. (1936).Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Jennings, D., Amabile, T. M., &Ross, L. (1982). Informal covariation assessment: Data-based vs. theory-based judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.),Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 211–230). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lane, D. M., Anderson, C. A., &Kellam, K. L. (1985). Judging the relatedness of variables: The psychophysics of covariation detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 640–649.
Lauer, T. W., &Post, G. V. (1989). Density in scatterplots and the estimation of correlation.Behaviour & Information Technology,8, 235–244.
Lewandowsky, S., &Spence, I. (1989). The perception of statistical graphs.Sociological Methods & Research,18, 200–242.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, J., &Shinar, D. (1992). Estimating correlations from scatterplots.Human Factors,34, 335–349.
Meyer, J., Taieb, M., &Flascher, I. (1997). Correlation estimates as perceptual judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,3, 3–20.
Pollack, I. (1960). Identification of visual correlational scatterplots.Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 351–360.
Strahan, R. F., &Hansen, C. J. (1978). Underestimating correlation from scatterplots.Applied Psychological Measurement,2, 543–550.
Wainer, H., &Thissen, D. (1979). On the robustness of a class of naive estimators.Applied Psychological Measurement,3, 543–551.
Wickens, T. D. (2002).Elementary signal detection theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doherty, M.E., Anderson, R.B., Angott, A.M. et al. The perception of scatterplots. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 1261–1272 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193961
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193961