Abstract
In four experiments on perceived object height and width, the effects of shifting participants’ effective eye height (EEH) on affordance (intrinsic) and apparent size (extrinsic) judgments were con-trasted. In Experiment 1, EEH shifts produced comparable overestimations ofheight in intrinsic and extrinsic tasks. A similar result was found with a more abstract extrinsic height task (Experiment 2). However, Experiment 3 revealed a dissociation between intrinsic and extrinsic tasks of perceivedwidth. Affordance judgments were affected by EEH shifts, whereas apparent size judgments were not. Experiment 4 compared participants’ performance on comparable extrinsic tasks of height and width. Height judgments were affected by EEH shifts, but width judgments were again unaffected. It is concluded that eye height may be a more natural metric for object height than for width. Moreover, this difference reflects a basic flexibility within the human visual system for selectively attuning to the most accessible sources of size information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bingham, G. P. (1993). Perceiving the size of trees: Biological form and the horizon ratio.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 485–495.
Fitch, H., &Turvey, M. T. (1978). On the control of activity: Some remarks from an ecological point of view. In D. Landers & R. Christina (Eds.),Psychology of motor behavior and sport (pp. 3–35). Urbana, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
Gibson, J. J. (1950).The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibson, J.J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gilden, D. L., &Proffitt, D. R. (1989). Understanding collision dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 372–383.
Gilden, D. L. &Proffitt, D. R. (1994). Heuristic judgment of mass ratio in two-body collisions.Perception & Psychophysics,56,708–720.
Gillam, B. (1980). Geometric illusions.Scientific American,242 (1), 102–111.
Gillam, B. (1995). The perception of spatial layout from static optical information. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.),Perception of space and motion (pp. 23–67). San Diego: Academic Press.
Helmholtz, H. Von (1962). Treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3; J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1867)
Holway, A. H., &Boring, E. G. (1941 ). Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant.American Journal of Psychology,54,21–37.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Leibowitz, H. W., Pollard, S. W, &Dickerson, D. (1966). Monocular and binocular size-matching as a function of distance at various age levels.American Journal of Psychology,79, 263–268.
Mark, L. S. (1987). Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 361–370.
Mark, L. S., &Vögele, D. (1987). A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: A study of sitting and stair climbing.Journal of Motor Behavior,19, 367–384.
Matin, L., &Fox, C. R. (1989). Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.Vision Research,29, 315–324.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1992). Visually perceived eye level: Changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 257–289.
Post, R. B., Welch, R. B., & Clark, V. D. (1996, November).Visually perceived eye level: Effects of pitch perception and eye position. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Proffitt, D. R., &Gilden, D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 384–393.
Rogers, S. (1996). The horizon-ratio relation as information for relative size in pictures.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 142–152.
Sedgwick, H. A. (1973). The visible horizon: A potential source of visual information for the perception of size and distance.Dissertation Abstracts International,34, 1301B-1302B. (University Microfilms No. 73-22530)
Stoper, A. E. (1990, November).Pitched environments and apparent height. Paper presented at the 31 st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Stoper, A. E., & Bautista, A. (1992, May).Apparent height as a function of pitched environment and task. Paper presented at ARVO, Sarasota, FL.
Stoper, A. E., &Cohen, M. M. (1989). Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 469–475.
Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 795–810.
Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 683–703.
Warken, W. H., &Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 371–383.
Wraga, M. (1999). Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 518–530.
Wraga, M., &Neisser, U. (1995).Effective eye height as a determinant ofperceived size and distance: Four exploratory studies (Rep. No. 32). Atlanta: Emory University Cognition Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported here was conducted as part of a doctoral dissertation at Emory University. I am indebted to Ulric Neisser for his guidance on this project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wraga, M. The role of eye height in perceiving affordances and object dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 490–507 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211968
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211968