Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Kattiana Constantino ; Juliana Alves Pereira ; Juliana Padilha ; Priscilla Vasconcelos and Eduardo Figueiredo

Affiliation: Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Brazil

Keyword(s): Software Product Lines, Variability Management, Feature Model, FeatureIDE, pure::variants.

Abstract: In the last decades, software product lines (SPL) have proven to be an efficient software development technique in industries due its capability to increase quality and productivity and decrease cost and time-to-market through extensive reuse of software artifacts. To achieve these benefits, tool support is fundamental to guide industries during the SPL development life-cycle. However, many different SPL tools are available nowadays and the adoption of the appropriate tool is a big challenge in industries. In order to support engineers choosing a tool that best fits their needs, this paper presents the results of a controlled empirical study to assess two Eclipse-based tools, namely FeatureIDE and pure::variants. This empirical study involved 84 students who used and evaluated both tools. The main weakness we observe in both tools are the lack adequate mechanisms for managing the variability, such as for product configuration. As a strength, we observe the automated analysis and the feature model editor. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 70.40.220.129

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Constantino, K., Pereira, J. A., Padilha, J., Vasconcelos, P. and Figueiredo, E. (2016). An Empirical Study of Two Software Product Line Tools. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering - ENASE; ISBN 978-989-758-189-2; ISSN 2184-4895, SciTePress, pages 164-171. DOI: 10.5220/0005829801640171

@conference{enase16,
author={Kattiana Constantino and Juliana Alves Pereira and Juliana Padilha and Priscilla Vasconcelos and Eduardo Figueiredo},
title={An Empirical Study of Two Software Product Line Tools},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering - ENASE},
year={2016},
pages={164-171},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005829801640171},
isbn={978-989-758-189-2},
issn={2184-4895},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering - ENASE
TI - An Empirical Study of Two Software Product Line Tools
SN - 978-989-758-189-2
IS - 2184-4895
AU - Constantino, K.
AU - Pereira, J.
AU - Padilha, J.
AU - Vasconcelos, P.
AU - Figueiredo, E.
PY - 2016
SP - 164
EP - 171
DO - 10.5220/0005829801640171
PB - SciTePress

- Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
RESOURCES

Proceedings

Papers

Authors

Ontology

CONTACTS

Science and Technology Publications, Lda
Avenida de S. Francisco Xavier, Lote 7 Cv. C,
2900-616 Setúbal, Portugal.

Phone: +351 265 520 185 (National fixed network call)
Fax: +351 265 520 186
Email: info@scitepress.org

EXTERNAL LINKS

PRIMORIS

INSTICC

SCITEVENTS

CROSSREF

PROCEEDINGS SUBMITTED FOR INDEXATION BY:

dblp

Ei Compendex

SCOPUS

Semantic Scholar

Google Scholar

Microsoft Academic