Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Post-classification comparison of land cover using multitemporal Landsat and ASTER imagery: the case of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed land cover (LC) changes in Kahramanmaraş (K.Maraş) and its environs by using multitemporal Landsat and ASTER imagery, respectively belong to 1989, 2000 and 2004. A priori defined nine land cover classes in the classification scheme were urban and built-up, forest, sparsely vegetated areas, grassland, vegetated stream beds, unvegetated stream beds, bare areas, crop fields, and water bodies. Individual classifications were employed using the combination of both unsupervised and supervised classification methods. Iterative Self Organizing Data Analysis (ISODATA) was used to reduce spectral variation in the scenes arising from complex pattern of crop fields. Maximum Likelihood classifier was used in the LC classification of the individual images. Image pairs of consecutive dates were compared by overlaying the thematic LC maps and cross-tabulating the LC statistics. Urbanization and expansion of agriculture were the major reasons for the dramatic LC conversions. The amount of conversion from crop fields to water occurred as large as 927.67 ha, accounting for 73% of the total land-to-water conversion. Conversions to agriculture have mainly been occurred from grasslands and sparsely vegetated areas as large as 1,314.95 and 1,325.84 ha, respectively. Urban coverage doubled in this period as a result of 1,443.45 ha of increase. Urban area increased in the second period from 2,920 to 3,526 ha. Conversions to agriculture occurred at high amounts. A total of 1,075.79 ha area changed from sparsely vegetated areas to crop fields. A landscape-level environmental monitoring scheme based on satellite remote sensing was proposed for effective environmental resource management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alphan, H. (2003). Land use change and urbanization of Adana, Turkey. Land Degradation and Development, 14, 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alphan, H., & Yılmaz, K. T. (2005). Monitoring environmental changes in the Mediterranean coastal landscape: the case of Cukurova, Turkey. Environmental Management, 35(5), 608–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. H., Roach, J. T., & Whitmer, R. E. (1976). A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensing data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi, K. D., Sitaula, B. K., Singh, B. R., & Bajacharaya, M. (2002). Land-use change in two Nepalese watersheds: GIS and geomorphometric analysis. Land Degradation and Development, 13, 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1993). CORINE Land-Cover: Guide technique. Report EUR 12585EN. Luxembourg: Office for Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Wang, J., Fu, B., & Qiu, Y. (2001). Land use change in a small catchment of northern Loess plateau, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 86, 63–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, A., & Jansen, J. M. (2000). Land cover classification system. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doygun, H., & Alphan, H. (2006). Urbanization of Iskenderun, Turkey, and its negative implications on the environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 114, 145–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erdas, (1999). Field guide. Atlanta, GA: ERDAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbah, H. (2007). Land use trends during rapid urbanization of the city of Aydin, Turkey. Environmental Management, 39, 443–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W., & Fu, B. (2002). Remote sensing for coastal area management in China. Coastal Management, 30, 271–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, C. Y., Liu, Q., Sun, D., Wang, S., Lin, P., & Lin, X. (2001). Monitoring urban expansion with remote sensing in China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(8), 1441–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepner, W. G., Watts, C. J., Edmonds, C. M., Maingi, J. K., Marsh, S. E., & Luna, G. (2000). A landscape approach for detecting and evaluating change in a semi-arid environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 69, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimoto, A., Mizuyama, T., & Okano, K. (2002). Spatial and temporal changes of vegetation cover in Granite Mountains in central Japan: a GIS based approach. Land Degradation and Development, 13, 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz, H. (2001). Geomorpholohgy of Kahramanmaraş Basin. Directorate of Culture, no. 3. Kahramanmaraş Province: Kahramanmaraş Governorship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, A., Welsh, H., & Wilson, R. (1996). The Effects of a dam on breeding habitat and egg survival of the Foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) in northwestern California. Herpetological Review, 27(2), 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawitz, D. F., Blewett, T. M., Cohen, A., & Alberti, M. (2006). Using NDVI to assess vegetative land cover change in central Puget Sound. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 114, 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H., & Utkarsh, G. (2003). Landscape ecological planning through a multi-scale characterization of pattern: studies in the western Ghats, south India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 87, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, P. H. (1973). Pattern recognition: A basis for remote sensing data analysis. LARS Information Note 111572. West Lafayette, IN: The Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • TSI (Turkish Statistical Institute) (2004). Kahramanmaraş urban population between the years 1950 and 2000. Results of General Census 2000. Ankara, Turkey: TSI.

    Google Scholar 

  • TSMS (Turkish State Meteorological Service) (2007). Climatic data of Kahramanmaraş, between 1996–2005. Ankara, Turkey: TSMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., He, T., Guo, X., Liu, A., & Zhou, Q. (2006). Dynamic changes of sandy land in northwest of Beijing, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 121, 109–125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A. (2002). Land degradation is contextual. Land Degradation and Development, 13, 449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., Fohrer, N., & Möller, D. (2001). Long-term land use changes in a mesoscale watershed due to socioeconomic factors – Effects on landscape structures and functions. Ecological Modeling, 140, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Alphan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alphan, H., Doygun, H. & Unlukaplan, Y.I. Post-classification comparison of land cover using multitemporal Landsat and ASTER imagery: the case of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 151, 327–336 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0274-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0274-x

Keywords