Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Effectiveness of Concept Maps in Teaching Physics Concepts Applied to Engineering Education: Experimental Comparison of the Amount of Learning Achieved With and Without Concept Maps

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to quantify the effectiveness of concept maps in learning physics in engineering degrees. The following research question was posed: What was the difference in learning results from the use of concept maps to study a particular topic in an engineering course? The study design was quasi-experimental and used a post-test as a measuring instrument. The sample included 114 university students from the School of Industrial Engineering who were divided into two equivalent homogeneous groups of 57 students each. The amount of learning attained by the students in each group was compared, with the independent variable being the teaching method; the experimental group (E.G.) used concept maps, while the control group (C.G.) did not. We performed a crossover study with the two groups of students, with one group acting as the E.G. for the topic of optical fibers and as the C.G. for the topic of the fundamental particles of matter and vice versa for the other group. For each of the two topics studied, the evaluation instrument was a test of 100 dichotomous items. The resulting data were subjected to a comparative statistical analysis, which revealed a significant difference in the amount of learning attained by the E.G. students as compared with the C.G. students. The results allow us to state that for the use of concept maps, the average increment in the E.G. students’ learning was greater than 19 percentage points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alpert SR, Grueneberg K (2001) Concept mapping with multimedia on the Web. J Educ Multime Hyperme 9(4):313

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Inman L, Ditson L (1999) Computer-based concept mapping: a tool for negotiating meaning. Learn Lead Technol 26(8):6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Inman L, Zeitz L (1993) Computer-based concept mapping: active studying for active learners. Comput Teach 21(1):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Inman L, Ditson LA, Ditson MT (1998) Computer-based concept mapping: promoting meaningful learning in science for students with disabilities. Inf Technol Disabil 5:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyrous, George Statistics for research: with a guide to SPSS (2005). 2nd (ed). London: Sage. ISBN: 1412919487

  • Austin LB, Shone BM (1995) Using concept mapping for assessment in physics. Phys Educ 30(1):4145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel DP (1968) Educational psychology: A cognitive viewpoint. Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel DP (2000) The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: a Cognitive View. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect; Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M, Hansen T, Joiner R, Traum D (1999) The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In: Dillenbourg P (ed) Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 31–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron B (2003) When smart groups fail. J Learn Sci 12:307–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broggy J, McClelland G (2008) An investigation to determine the impact of concept mapping on learning in an undergraduate physics course. New Direct Teach Phys Sci 4:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañas AJ, Ford KM, Novak JD, Hayes P, Reichherzer T, Suri N (2001) Online concept maps: enhancing collaborative learning by using technology with concept maps. Sci Teach 68(4):49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Cañas AJ, Coffey JW, Carnot MJ, Feltovich P, Hoffman RR, Feltovich J et al. (2003). A summary of literature pertaining to the use of concept mapping techniques and technologies for education and performance support. Report from the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition

  • Caswell RM, Wendel CT (1992) Conceptual changes occurring in elementary teachers’ knowledge of science concepts throughout long-term instruction. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Fransisco, CA

  • Chen NS, Kinshuk, Wei CW, Chen HJ (2008) Mining e-Learning domain concept map from academic articles. Comput Educ 50:1009–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CH, Huang CC, Chang WT (2000) The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping. Comput Educ 34(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes L, Hsieh YJ (2003) Visualization for construction of meaning during study time: a quantitative analysis. Int J Instruct Med 30(3):263–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline BE, Brewster CC, Fell RD (2010) A rule-based system for automatically evaluating student concept maps. Expert Syst Appl 37(3):2282–2291

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorough DK, Rye JA (1997) Mapping for understandingusing concept maps as windows to students’ minds. Sci Teach 64(1):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis GW, Rudnitsky A, Silverstein B (2004) Using concept maps to enhance understanding in engineering education. Int J Eng Educ 20(6):1012–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher KM, Faletti J, Patternson H, Thornton R, Lipson J, Spring C (1990) Computer-based concept mapping. J Coll Sci Teach 19:347–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul RB, Boman JA (2006) Concept mapping: a strategy for teaching and evaluation in nursing education. Nurse Educ Pract 6(4):199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugwitz M, Nesbit JC, Sandmann A (2010) Cognitive ability and the instructional efficacy of collaborative concept mapping. Learn Individ Diff 20(5):536–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández P, Serio A (2004) ¿Cómo hacer eficaces los mapas conceptuales en la instrucción? Infancia y Aprendizaje 27:247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton PB, McConney AA, Gallo M, Woods AL, Senn GJ, Hamelin D (1993) An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Sci Educ 77:95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (2000) Computer as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH, Reeves TC, Hong N, Harvey D, Karen P (1997) Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. J Interact Learn Res 8(3/4):289–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon SY, Cifuentes L (2007) Using computers to individually-generate versus collaboratively-generate concept maps. J Educ Technol Soc 10(4):269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon SY, Cifuentes L (2009) The comparative effect of individually-constructed versus collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Comput Educ 52:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque R (2007) SPSS programming and data management: a guide for SPSS and SAS users fourth edition, SPSS Inc., Chicago. ISBN 1568273908

  • Liu PL, Chen CJ, Chang Y (2010) Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students’ english reading comprehension. Comput Educ 54:436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logic eXtension Resources (2011) LXR-Test software. http://www.lxrtest.com

  • Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Mathemat Stat 18(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham KM, Mintzes JJ, Jones M (1994) The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: further evidence of validity. J Res Sci Teach 31(1):91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow PG, Lonning RA (1998) Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: students’ perceptions and effects on achievement. J Res Sci Teach 35(9):1015–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH, Novak JD (1998) Teaching science for understanding. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Montanero M, Montanero M (1995) Didáctica del momento angular de una partícula. ICE, Badajoz

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon B, Hoffman RR, Novak J, Cañas A (2011) Applied Concept Mapping: Capturing, Analyzing, and Organizing Knowledge. CRC PRESS, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD (1998) Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD, Cañas AJ (2006) The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical report IHMC CmapTools

  • Novak JD, Gowin DB (1984) Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD, Musonda D (1991) A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. Am Educ Res J 28(1):117–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD, Gowin DB, Johansen GT (1983) The use of concept mapping and knowledge mapping with junior high school science students. Sci Educ 67(5):625–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okebukola PA, Jegede OJ (1988) Cognitive preference and learning mode as determinants of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Sci Educ 72:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okebukola PA, Jegede OJ (1989) Students’ anxiety towards and perception of difficulty of some biological concepts under the concept mapping heuristic. Res Sci Technol Educ 7:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankratius WJ (1990) Building an organized knowledge base: concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. J Res Sci Teach 27:315–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson ME, Dansereau DF, Newbern D (1992) Effects of communication aids and strategies on cooperative teaching. J Educ Psychol 84:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez AL, Suero MI, Montanero M, Pardo PJ (2001) Three-dimensional conceptual maps: an illustration for the logical structure of the content of optics. International conference physics teacher education Beyond 2000. Selected contributions. ISBN 2-84299-312-8, pp 603–604. Editorial Elsevier Francia

  • Pérez AL, Suero MI, Pardo PJ, Montanero M (2006) Utilización de Cmaps para mejorar los conocimientos relativos a la luz mediante su reconstrucción colaborativa. Concept maps: theory, methodology, technology In: Proceedings of the second international conference on concept mapping San José, Costa Rica

  • Pérez AL, Suero MI, Pardo PJ (2008) Utilización de Cmaps para mejorar los conocimientos relativos a la refracción de la Luz mediante su “Reconstrucción Colaborativa”. Óptica pura y aplicada 41:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez AL, Suero MI, Montanero M, Pardo PJ, Montanero M (2010) Chapter 17 Concept maps and conceptual change in physics on Handbook of research on collaborative learning using concept mapping. ISBN 15-990-4992-2, pp. 325–345, 2009 Idea Group Publishing, USA

  • Quinn HJ, Mintzes JJ, Laws RA (2004) Successive concept mapping: assessing understanding in college science classes. J Coll Sci Teach 33(3):12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader W, Hammond N (1994) Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond. Comput Educ 12:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth W-M, Roychoudhury A (1992) The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as device and tool thinking in high conscription for social school science. Sci Educ 76:531–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth W-M, Roychoudhury A (1993) The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: a microanalysis of high school physics students. J Res Sci Teach 30:503–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth WM, Roychoudhury A (1994) Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher. Int J Sci Educ 16:437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer R, Royer J (2004) Comparing hand drawn and computer generated concept mapping. J Comp Mathemat Sci Teach 23(1):67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotte V, Lonka K (1999) Spontaneous concept maps aiding the understanding of scientific concepts. Int J Sci Educ 21:515–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KA (1987) Educational engineering: heuristics for improving learning effectiveness and efficiency. Eng Educ 77(5):274–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanova N, Kommers P (2002) Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. J Interact Learn Res 13:111–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JMT, King PH (2003) Concept mapping as a form of student assessment and instruction in the domain of bioengineering. J Eng Educ 92(2):167–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitz L, Anderson-Inman L (1992) The effects of computer-based formative concept mapping on learning high school science. American Educational Research Association, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieneddine A, Abd-El-Khalick F (2001) Doing the right thing versus doing the right thing right: concept mapping in a freshmen physics laboratory. Eur J Phys 22:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orion Research Group, Department of Physics, University of Extremadura, Avda. de Elvas s/n, 06071, Badajoz, Spain

    Guadalupe Martínez, Ángel Luis Pérez, María Isabel Suero & Pedro J. Pardo

Authors
  1. Guadalupe Martínez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ángel Luis Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Isabel Suero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pedro J. Pardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guadalupe Martínez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez, G., Pérez, Á.L., Suero, M.I. et al. The Effectiveness of Concept Maps in Teaching Physics Concepts Applied to Engineering Education: Experimental Comparison of the Amount of Learning Achieved With and Without Concept Maps. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 204–214 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9386-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9386-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation