Abstract
Following the catastrophic and devastating Atlantic Hurricane seasons in 2004 and 2005, there has been increased interest in formulating planning directives and policy aimed at minimizing the societal impacts of future storms. Not all populations will evacuate an area forecast to be affected by a hurricane, so emergency managers must plan for these people who remain behind. Such planning includes making food, water, ice, and other provisions available at strategic locations throughout an affected area. Recent research has tackled problems related to humanitarian and relief goods distribution with respect to hurricanes. Experience shows that the torrential rains and heavy winds associated with hurricanes can severely damage transportation network infrastructure rendering it unusable. Scanning the literature on hurricane disaster relief provision, there are no studies that expressly consider the potential damage that may be caused to a transportation network by strong storms. This paper examines the impacts of simulated network failures on hurricane disaster relief planning strategies, using a smaller Florida City as an example. A relief distribution protocol is assumed where goods distribution points are set up in pre-determined locations following the passage of a storm. Simulation results reveal that modest disruptions to the transportation network produce marked changes in the number and spatial configuration of relief facilities. At the same time, the transportation network appears to be robust and is able to support relief service provision even at elevated levels of hypothesized disruption.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int J Mass Emerg Disast 9(2):287–310
Balakrishna R, Yang W, Ben-Akiva M, Antoniou C (2008) Simulation-based framework for transportation network management in emergencies. Transp Res Rec 2041:80–88
Balcik B, Beamon BM (2008) Facility location in humanitarian relief. Int J Logist Res Appl 11(2):101–121
Barbarosoglu G, Arda Y (2004) A two-stage stochastic programming framework for transportation planning in disaster response. J Oper Res Soc 55(1):43–53
Brown G, Carlyle M, Diehl D, Kline J, Wood K (2005) A two-sided optimization for theater ballistic missile defense. Oper Res 53(5):745–763
Brown C, White W, van Slyke C, Benson JD (2009) Development of a strategic hurricane evacuation-dynamic traffic assignment model for the Houston, Texas, Region. Transp Res Rec 2137:46–53
Chang M-S, Tseng Y-L, Chen J-W (2007) A scenario planning approach for the flood emergency logistics preparation problem under uncertainty. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 43(6):737
Current J, Ratick S, ReVelle C (1998) Dynamic facility location when the total number of facilities is uncertain: a decision analysis approach. Eur J Oper Res 110(3):597–609
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261
Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Mitchell JT, Boruff BJ, Gall M, Schmidtlein MC, Burton CG, Melton G (2006) The long road home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment 48(2):8–20
Dow K, Cutter SL (2002) Emerging hurricane evacuation issues: Hurricane Floyd and South Carolina. Nat Hazards Rev 3(1):12–18
Drezner T (2009) Location of retail facilities under conditions of uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 167(1):107
Elsner JB, Jagger TH (2006) Comparison of hindcasts anticipating the 2004 Florida Hurricane season. Weather Forecast 21(2):182–192
Fu HQ, Wilmot CG (2006) Survival analysis-based dynamic travel demand models for hurricane evacuation. Transp Res Rec 1964:211–218
Ghanmi A, Shaw R (2008) Modelling and analysis of Canadian Forces strategic lift and pre-positioning options. J Oper Res Soc 59(12):1591–1602
Hale TS, Moberg CR (2003) Location science research: a review. Ann Oper Res 123(1–4):21–35
Hale T, Moberg C (2005) Improving supply chain disaster preparedness? A decision process for secure site location. Int J Phys Distribut Logist Manage 33(3):195–207
Heng W, Zeng QA, Hong H, Wang XH, Kukreti AR (2008) Integrated urban evacuation planning framework for responding to human-caused disasters over a surface transportation network. Transp Res Rec 2041:29–37
Hiatt LM, Simmons R (2007) Pre-positioning assets to increase execution efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vols 1–10. IEEE, New York, pp 324–329
Holguin-Veras J, Perez N, Ukkusuri S, Wachtendorf T, Brown B (2007) Emergency logistics issues affecting the response to Katrina—a synthesis and preliminary suggestions for improvement. Transp Res Rec 2022:76–82
Horner MW, Downs JA (2007) Testing a flexible GIS-based network flow model for routing hurricane disaster relief goods. Transp Res Rec 2022:47–54
Horner MW, Downs JA (2008) An analysis of the effects of socio-economic status on hurricane disaster relief plans. Transp Res Rec 2067:1–10
Horner MW, Downs JA (2010) Optimizing hurricane disaster relief goods distribution: model development and application with respect to planning strategies. Disasters 34(3):821–844
Kar B, Hodgson ME (2008) A GIS-based model to determine site suitability of emergency evacuation shelters. Trans GIS 12(2):227–248
Larimer S (2008) Florida homes evacuated as waters rise in wake of fay. USA Today, 8/24/2008
Lindell MK, Prater CS (2007) Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: examples from hurricane research and planning. J Urban Plan Dev Asce 133(1):18–29
Management FDoE (2004) Comprehensive emergency management plan, vol 2007. http://floridadisaster.org/documents/CEMP/floridaCEMP.htm
Management FDoE (2006) County logistics planning standard—operating guideline
Miller HJ, Shaw S-L (2001) Geographic information systems for transportation. Oxford University Press, New York
Pielke R, Gratz J, Landsea C, Collins D, Saunders M, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damages to the United States. Nat Hazards Rev 9(1):29–42
Ratick S, Meacham B, Aoyama Y (2008) Locating backup facilities to enhance supply chain disaster resilience. Growth Change 39(4):642–666
Rawls CG, Turnquist MA (2010) Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transport Res B Methodol 44(4):521–534
ReVelle CS, Swain RW (1970) Central facilities location. Geogr Anal 2(1):30–42
Sheu JB (2010) Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters. Transp Res Pt e-Logist Transp Rev 46(1):1–17
Snyder LV (2006) Facility location under uncertainty: a review. IIE Trans 38(7):537–554
Tanaka K, Nagatani T, Hanaura H (2007) Traffic congestion and dispersion in hurricane evacuation. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 376:617–627
Teixeira JC, Antunes AP (2008) A hierarchical location model for public facility planning. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):92
Widener MJ, Horner MW (2010) A hierarchical approach to modeling hurricane disaster relief goods distribution. J Transp Geogr. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.10.006
Wolshon B (2006) Evacuation planning and engineering for hurricane Katrina. The Bridge 36(1):27–34
Yuan F, Han LD (2009) Improving evacuation planning with sensible measure of effectiveness choices case study. Transp Res Rec 2137:54–62
Zahran S, Brody SD, Peacock WG, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters 32(4):537
Acknowledgments
This paper is partially based on work supported by the US National Science Foundation under Grant No. (BCS-0550330) awarded to the first author (Mark W. Horner). Any opinions, findings, and/or results expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horner, M.W., Widener , M.J. The effects of transportation network failure on people’s accessibility to hurricane disaster relief goods: a modeling approach and application to a Florida case study. Nat Hazards 59, 1619–1634 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9855-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9855-z