Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility maps are vital for disaster management and for planning development activities in the mountainous country like Nepal. In the present study, landslide susceptibility assessment of Mugling–Narayanghat road and its surrounding area is made using bivariate (certainty factor and index of entropy) and multivariate (logistic regression) models. At first, a landslide inventory map was prepared using earlier reports and aerial photographs as well as by carrying out field survey. As a result, 321 landslides were mapped and out of which 241 (75 %) were randomly selected for building landslide susceptibility models, while the remaining 80 (25 %) were used for validating the models. The effectiveness of landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and statistics is based on appropriate selection of the factors which play a dominant role in slope stability. In this case study, the following landslide conditioning factors were evaluated: slope gradient; slope aspect; altitude; plan curvature; lithology; land use; distance from faults, rivers and roads; topographic wetness index; stream power index; and sediment transport index. These factors were prepared from topographic map, drainage map, road map, and the geological map. Finally, the validation of landslide susceptibility map was carried out using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The ROC plot estimation results showed that the susceptibility map using index of entropy model with AUC value of 0.9016 has highest prediction accuracy of 90.16 %. Similarly, the susceptibility maps produced using logistic regression model and certainty factor model showed 86.29 and 83.57 % of prediction accuracy, respectively. Furthermore, the ROC plot showed that the success rate of all the three models performed more than 80 % accuracy (i.e. 89.15 % for IOE model, 89.10 % for LR model and 87.21 % for CF model). Hence, it is concluded that all the models employed in this study showed reasonably good accuracy in predicting the landslide susceptibility of Mugling–Narayanghat road section. These landslide susceptibility maps can be used for preliminary land use planning and hazard mitigation purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikari TL (2009) Disaster mitigation works along Narayanghat Mugling Highway. In: International seminar on hazard management for sustainable development

  • Ahmad R, Joshi MN (2010) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on land degradation processes in Chamoli and surrounding area using RS and GIS technique. Int Geoinf Res Dev J 1(3)

  • Akgün A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54:1127–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün A, Kıncal C, Pradhan B (2011) Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey). Environ Monit Assess. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2352-8 (Article online first available)

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgün A, Sezer EA, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Pradhan B (2012) An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm. Comput Geosci 38(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S (2012) Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 44:120–135. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Massari R (1998) Generalized linear modeling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy. Comput Geosci 24:373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1–2):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik M, Magulova B, Matys M, Marschalko M (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kralovany–Liptovsky Mikulas railway case study. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 35(3–5):162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarik M, Yilmaz I, Marschalko M (2012) Landslide hazard and risk assessment: a case study from the Hlohovec–Sered’ landslide area in south-west Slovakia. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0257-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1991) Integration of geoscientific data using GIS. In: Goodchild MF, Rhind DW, Maguire DJ (eds) Geographic information systems: principle and applications. Longdom, London, pp 171–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabb EE (1984) Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping. In: Proceedings 4th international symposium on landslides, Toronto, vol 1, pp 307–324

  • Brenning A (2005) Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat Hazard Earth Syst 5:853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsden D, Doornkamp JC, Fookes PG, Jones DKC, Kelly JMH (1975) Large-scale geotechnical mapping and highway engineering design. Q J Eng Geol 8:227–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2011) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and GIS. Comput Geosci (Article on-line first available). doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012a) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using Artificial Neural Network. Geomorphology. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023 (Article online first available)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012b) Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Vietnam: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena 96:28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I (2012c) Landslide susceptibility assessment in Vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree and Naïve Bayes models. Math Probl Eng 2012:1–26. doi:10.1155/2012/974638

    Google Scholar 

  • Can T, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman TY (2005) Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three subcatchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 72(1–4):250–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi J, Oh HJ, Lee HJ, Lee C, Lee S (2012) Combining landslide susceptibility maps obtained from frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models using ASTER images and GIS. Eng Geol 124:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJ, Fabbri AG (1999) Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm Eng Rem S 65(12):1389–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJ, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards 30:451–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJ, Fabbri AG (2005) Systematic procedures of landslide hazard mapping for risk assessment using spatial prediction models. In: Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide hazard and risk. Wiley, New York, pp 139–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantin M, Bednarik M, Jurchescu MC, Vlaicu M (2011) Landslide susceptibility assessment using the bivariate statistical analysis and the index of entropy in the Sibiciu Basin (Romania). Environ Earth Sci 63:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahal RK, Hasegawa S (2008) Representative rainfall thresholds for landslides in the Nepal Himalaya. Geomorphology 100:429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M, Dhakal S, Paudyal P (2008) Predictive modelling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of evidence. Geomorphology 102(3–4):496–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Bhandary NP, Poudel PP, Nonomurac A, Yatabe Y (2012) A replication of landslide hazard mapping at catchment scale. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk. doi:10.1080/19475705.2011.629007

    Google Scholar 

  • Deoja B, Dhital MR, Thapa B, Wagner A (1991) Mountain risk engineering handbook. In: ICIMOD, Kathmandu, 857 pp

  • Dhakal AS, Amada T, Aniya M (2000) Landslide hazard mapping and its evaluation using GIS: an investigation of sampling schemes for a grid-cell based quantitative method. Photogramm Eng Remote S 66(8):981–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhital MR (2000) An overview of landslide hazard mapping and rating systems in Nepal. J Nepal Geol Soc 22:533–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhital MR, Upreti BN, Dangol V, Bhandari AN, Bhattarai TN (1991) Geological engineering methods applied in mountain road survey: an example from Baitadi-Darchula Road Project (Nepal). J Nepal Geol Soc 7:49–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhital MR, Shrestha R, Ghimire M, Shrestha GB, Tripathi D (2006) Hydrological hazard mapping in Rupandehi district, West Nepal. J Nepal Geol Soc 31:59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • DoR/USAID (1986) Rapti road assessment study, engineering studies, final technical report (Vol. II). Unpublished report submitted to the Department of Roads (DoR) and the USAID by Luis Berger International Inc. and East Consult (P) Ltd (unpubl)

  • DPTC (Water Induced Disaster Prevention Technical Centre) (1996) A technical guideline on landslide prevention works. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Water Resources, Water Induced Disaster Prevention Technical Centre, Pulchowk, Lalitpur, 50 pp

  • DWIDP (2009) The study on disaster risk management for Narayanghar–Mugling Highway. Unpublished report

  • Einstein HH (1988) Special lecture: landslides risk assessment procedure. In: Proceedings of 5th symposium on landslides, Lausanne, vol 2, pp 1075–1090

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkye) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41:720–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75:229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C, van Asch TWJ (2004) Landslide susceptibility zoning north of Yenice (NW Turkey) by multivariate statistical techniques. Nat Hazards 32:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erener A, Düzgün HSB (2010) Improvement of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping by using spatial and global regression methods in the case of More and Romsdal (Norway). Landslides 7(1):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganser A (1964) Geology of the Himalaya. Inter Science John Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard J (1994) The landslide hazard in the Himalayas: geological control and human action. Geomorphology 10:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard AJ, Gardner RAM (2000a) The role of landsliding in shaping the landscape of the middle hills, Nepal. Z Geomorphol Suppl Bd 122:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard AJ, Gardner RAM (2000b) The nature and management implications of landsliding on irrigated terraces in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Int J Sust Dev World 7:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gökçeolu C, Sonmez H, Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Can T (2005) The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide-susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Eng Geol 81:65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorum T, Gonencgil B, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA (2008) Implementation of reconstructed geomorphologic units in landslide susceptibility mapping: the Melen Gorge (NW Turkey). Nat Hazards 46(3):323–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72:272–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen T (1969) Report on the geological survey of Nepal preliminary reconnaissance: Zurich, Mémoires de la soc. In: Helvétique des sci Naturelles, 185 pp

  • Hasegawa S, Dahal RK, Yamanaka M, Bhandari NP, Yatabe R, Inagaki H (2009) Causes of large landslides in the Lesser Himalaya of central Nepal. Environ Geol 57:1423–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives JD, Messerli B (1981) Mountain hazards mapping in Nepal; introduction to an applied mountain research project, vol 1. Mountain Research and Development, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 223–230

  • Jia N, Xie M, Mitani Y, Ikemi H, Djamaluddin I (2010) A GIS-based spatial data processing system for slope monitoring. Int Geoinf Res Dev J 1(4)

  • Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Gupta RP, Sarkar S (2008) Landslide risk assessment using danger pixel and fuzzy concepts in Darjeeling Himalayas. Landslides 5:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo DP, Sarkar S, Sharma S (2011) Combining neural network with fuzzy, certainty factor and likelihood ratio concepts for spatial prediction of landslides. Nat Hazards 59:1491–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi Nasab S, Ranjbar H, Akbar S (2010) Susceptibility assessment of the terrain for slope failure using remote sensing and GIS, a case study of Maskoon area, Iran. Int Geoinf Res Dev J 1(3)

  • Kojan E (1978) Report on landslide problems, western hill road project, Godavari to Dandeldhura, Nepal. Unpublished Report, USAID

  • Laban P (1979) Landslide occurrence in Nepal. HMG/FAO and UNDP, Ministry of Forest, Department of Soil Conservation, Integrated Watershed Management, Kathmandu, 27 pp

  • Lee S (2007) Landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network in the Gangneung area, Korea. Int J Remote Sens 28:4763–4783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Min K (2001) Statistical analyses of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environ Geol 40:1095–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2006) Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island, Malaysia. J Earth Sys Sci 115(6):661–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Won JS, Park HJ (2004) Determination and application of the weights for landslide susceptibility mapping: using an artificial neural network. Eng Geol 71:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Ryu JH, Kim IS (2007) Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides 4:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliulo P, Lisio AD, Russo F, Zelano A (2008) Geomorphology and landslide susceptibility assessment using GIS and bivariate statistics: a case study in southern Italy. Nat Hazards 47(3):411–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB (1991) Terrain-based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resour Res 27(6):1171–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol 97(3–4):171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer E, Gokceoglu C, Bozkir A, Duman T (2010) Assessment of landslide susceptibility by decision trees in the metropolitan area of Istanbul, Turkey. Math Probl Eng, Article ID 901095

  • Neuhäuser B, Terhorst B (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 86:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci 7(9):1264–1276. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Park NW, Lee SS, Lee S (2011) Extraction of landslide-related factors from ASTER imagery and its application to landslide susceptibility mapping. Int J Remote Sens 33(10):3211–3231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareek N, Sharma ML, Arora MK (2010) Impact of seismic factors on landslide susceptibility zonation: a case study in part of Indian Himalayas. Landslides 7(2):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petley DN, Hearn GJ, Hart A, Rosser NJ, Dunning SA, Oven K, Mitchell WA (2006) Trends in landslide occurrence in Nepal. Nat Hazards 43:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal CP, Chang C, Oh HJ, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environ Earth Sci 61:1049–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Mohammadi M, Moradi HR (2012a) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C, Deylami Moezzi K (2012b) A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and Weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS, Geomatics. Nat Hazards Risk. doi:10.1080/19475705.2012.662915

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012c) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Gokceoglu C, Pradhan B, Deylami Moezzi K (2012d) Landslide susceptibility mapping using a spatial multi criteria evaluation model at Haraz Watershed, Iran. In: Pradhan B, Buchroithner M (eds) Terrigenous mass movements. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–49, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25495-6-2

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012e) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran. Catena 97:71–84. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010a) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45(10):1244–1256

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010b) Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis. Int J Comput Int Sys 3(3):370–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010c) Landslide susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 38(2):301–320. doi:10.1007/s12524-010-0020-z

  • Pradhan B (2011a) Manifestation of an advanced fuzzy logic model coupled with geoinformation techniques coupled with geoinformation techniques for landslide susceptibility analysis. Environ Ecol Stat 18(3):471–493. doi:10.1007/s10651-010-0147-7

  • Pradhan B (2011b) Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 63(2):329–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Buchroithner MF (2010) Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environ Eng Geosci 16(2):107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2009) Landslide risk analysis using artificial neural network model focusing on different training sites. Int J Phys Sci 3(11):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010a) Delineation of landslide hazard areas using frequency ratio, logistic regression and artificial neural network model at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 60:1037–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010b) Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 7:13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S (2010c) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25(6):747–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Pirasteh S (2010) Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping. Disaster Adv 3(2):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM (2010) Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS on landslide hazard analysis using spatial-based statistical models. Arab J Geosci 3(3):319–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Singh RP, Buchroithner MF (2006) Estimation of stress and its use in evaluation of landslide prone regions using remote sensing data. Adv Space Res 37:698–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Mansor S, Buchroithner MF, Jallaluddin N, Khujaimah Z (2008) Utilization of optical remote sensing data and geographic information system tools for regional landslide hazard analysis by using binomial logistic regression model. Appl Remote Sens 2:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MB (2009) Use of geospatial data for the development of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide hazard mapping: a case study in Malaysia. Appl Geomat 1:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Buchroithner MF (2010a) Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Trans Geosci Remote 48(12):4164–4177

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Youssef AM, Varathrajoo R (2010b) Approaches for delineating landslide hazard areas using different training sites in an advanced artificial neural network model. Geo-Spat Inf Sci 13(2):93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010c) Remote sensing and GIS based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model. Photogramm Fernerkun 2010(1):17–32. doi:10.1127/14328364/2010/0037

  • Pradhan B, Oh HJ, Buchroithner M (2010d) Weights-of-evidence model applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in a tropical hilly area. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk 1(3):199–223. doi:10.1080/19475705.2010.498151

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Mansor S, Pirasteh S, Buchroithner M (2011) Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model. Int J Remote Sens 32(14):4075–4087. doi:10.1080/01431161.2010.484433

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Chaudhari A, Adinarayana J, Buchroithner MF (2012) Soil erosion assessment and its correlation with landslide events using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study at Penang Island, Malaysia. Environ Monit Assess 184(2):715–727

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajbhandari PCL, Alam BM, Akther MS (2002) Application of GIS (Geographic Information System) for landslide hazard zonation and mapping disaster prone area: a study of Kulekhani Watershed, Nepal. Plan plus 1(1):117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010a) Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 115:172–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010b) Assessing susceptibility to landslides: using models to understand observed changes in slopes. Geomorphology 112:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Yoshida K, Dhital MR, Devkota K (2012) Effect of rock weathering, clay mineralogy, and geological structures in the formation of large landslide, a case study from Dumre Besei landslide, Lesser Himalaya Nepal. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-011-0311-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha AK, Gupta RP, Sarkar I, Arora KM, Csaplovics E (2005) An approach for GIS-based statistical landslide susceptibility zonation with a case study in the Himalayas. Landslides 2(1):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito H, Nakayama D, Matsuyama H (2009) Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: the Akaishi Mountains, Japan. Geomorphology 109:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sezer EA, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2011) Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Expert Syst Appl 38(7):8208–8219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shroder JF, Bishop MP (1998) Mass movements in the Himalaya: new insights and research directions. Geomorphology 26:13–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soeters R, van Westen CJ (1996) Slope stability recognition analysis and zonation. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation, transportation research board special report 247. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 129–177

  • Stöcklin J (1980) Geology of Nepal and its regional frame. J Geol Soc Lond 137:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöcklin J, Bhattarai KD (1978) Geology of the Kathmandu area and central Mahabharat range. Nepal Himalaya. Report of Department of Mines and Geology/UNDP (unpublished), 86 pp

  • Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunusluoglu MC, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2008) Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey). Environ Geol 54:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2010) A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 36(9):1101–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ (2004) Geo-information tools for landslide risk assessment: an overview of recent developments. In: Lacerda W, Ehrlich M, Fontoura SAB, Sayao ASF (eds) Landslides: evaluation and stabilization. Taylor and Francis, Balkema, pp 39–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30:399–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1984) Commission on landslides and other mass movements: landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO Press, Paris 63 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlcko J, Wagner P, Rychlikova Z (1980) Evaluation of regional slope stability. Mineralia Slovaca 12(3):275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (1981) Rock structure and slope stability study of Waling area, central west Nepal. J Nepal Geol Soc 1(2):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan S (2009) A spatial decision support system for extracting the core factors and thresholds for landslide susceptibility map. Eng Geol 108:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HB, Wu SR, Shi JS, Li B (2011) Qualitative hazard and risk assessment of landslides: a practical framework for a case study in China. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0008-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF (1984) Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. As Eng Geol Bull 21(3):337–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu X, Lee YH, Tan X, Yu G, Dai F (2012) The 2010 Yushu earthquake triggered landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence modeling. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1624-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009a) A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009b) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35:1125–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2010a) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci 61:821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2010b) The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability and artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 60:505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarea M, Pourghasemi HR, Vafakhah M, Pradhan B (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0610-x (Article online first available)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments which were very useful in bringing the manuscript into its present form. The authors also express their gratitude to MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan) for funding for the present study. Mr. Binod Regmi, Mr. Ishan Basyal and Miss. Shristi Bhusal are sincerely acknowledged for their great help during the field work and in writing this manuscript. This research was supported by the BK21 and the Energy Resources and Environmental Geology Team, Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswajeet Pradhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devkota, K.C., Regmi, A.D., Pourghasemi, H.R. et al. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65, 135–165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6

Keywords