Abstract
Proteins are essential parts of living organisms and participate in virtually every process within cells. As the genomic sequences for increasing number of organisms are completed, research into how proteins can perform such a variety of functions has become much more intensive because the value of the genomic sequences relies on the accuracy of understanding the encoded gene products. Although the static three-dimensional structures of many proteins are known, the functions of proteins are ultimately governed by their dynamic characteristics, including the folding process, conformational fluctuations, molecular motions, and protein-ligand interactions. In this review, the physicochemical principles underlying these dynamic processes are discussed in depth based on the free energy landscape (FEL) theory. Questions of why and how proteins fold into their native conformational states, why proteins are inherently dynamic, and how their dynamic personalities govern protein functions are answered. This paper will contribute to the understanding of structure-function relationship of proteins in the post-genome era of life science research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol, 1999, 293: 321–331
Anfinsen CB. The formation and stabilization of protein structure. Biochem J, 1972, 128: 737–749
Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science, 1973, 181: 223–230
Henzler-Wildman KA, Kern D. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature, 2007, 450: 964–972
Liu SQ, Xie YH, Ji XL, Tao Y, Tan DY, Zhang KQ, Fu YX. Protein folding, binding and energy landscape: a synthesis. In: Kaumaya PTP, ed. Protein Engineering. Rijeka: Intech, 2012. 207–252
Yang LQ, Sang P, Xie YH, Tao Y, Fu YX, Zhang KQ, Liu SQ. Protein dynamics and motions in relation to their functions: Several case studies and the underlying mechanisms. J Biomol Struct Dyn, 2014, 32: 372–393
Karplus M, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol, 2002, 9: 646–652
Hansson T, Oostenbrink C, van Gunsteren W. Molecular dynamics simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2002, 12: 190–196
Kannan S, Zacharias M. Simulated annealing coupled replica exchange molecular dynamics-an efficient conformational sampling method. J Struct Biol, 2009, 166: 288–294
Haliloglu T, Bahar I, Erman B. Gaussian dynamics of folded proteins. Phys Rev Lett, 1997, 79: 3090–3093
Scheraga HA, Khalili M, Liwo A. Protein-folding dynamics: overview of molecular simulation techniques. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 2007, 58: 57–83
Laio A, Parrinello M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99: 12562–12566
Granata D, Camilloni C, Vendruscolo M, Laio A. Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by nmr-guided metadynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110: 6817–6822
Laio A, Gervasio FL. Metadynamics: a method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science. Rep Prog Phys, 2008, 71: 126601–126623
Kastner J. Umbrella sampling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci, 2011, 1: 932–942
Torrie GM, Valleau JP. Non-physical sampling distributions in monte-carlo free-energy estimation: umbrella sampling. J Comput Phys, 1977, 23: 187–199
Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA. Multidimensional free-energy calculations using the weighted histogram analysis method. J Comput Chem, 1995, 16: 1339–1350
Roux B. The calculation of the potential of mean force using computer simulations. Comput Phys Comm, 1995, 91: 275–282
Adcock SA, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev, 2006, 106: 1589–1615
Paci E, Karplus M. Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol, 1999, 288: 441–459
Schlitter J, Engels M, Kruger P, Jacoby E, Wollmer A. Targeted molecular-dynamics simulation of conformational change-application to the T-R transition in insulin. Mol Simul, 1993, 10: 291–308
Jarzynski C. Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys Rev Lett, 1997, 78: 2690–2693
Stone JE, Phillips JC, Freddolino PL, Hardy DJ, Trabuco LG, Schulten K. Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J Comput Chem, 2007, 28: 2618–2640
Brown WM, Kohlmeyer A, Plimpton SJ, Tharrington AN. Implementing molecular dynamics on hybrid high performance computers — particle-particle particle-mesh. Comput Phys Comm, 2012, 183: 449–459
Harvey M, Giupponi G, De Fabritiis G. Acemd: accelerated molecular dynamics simulations in the microseconds timescale. J Chem Theory Comput, 2009, 5: 1632–1639
Liu SQ, Liang LM, Tao Y, Yang LQ, Ji XL, Yang JK, Fu YX, Zhang KQ. Structural and dynamic basis of serine proteases from nema tophagous fungi for cuticle degradation. In: Stoytcheva M, ed. Pesticides in the Modern World-Pests Control and Pesticides Exposure and Toxicity Assessment. Rijeka: Intech, 2011. 333–376
Rapaport DC. The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
Sagui C, Daren TA. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules: long-range electrostatic effects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 1999, 28: 155–179
Haran G. How, when and why proteins collapse: the relation to folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2012, 22: 14–20
Haynie DT. Biological Thermodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001
Gibbs JW. A method of geometrical representation of the thermodynamic properties of substances by means of surfaces. Trans Conn Acad Arts Sci, 1873, 2: 382–404
Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Protein Struct Funct Genet, 1995, 21: 167–195
Wales DJ. Energy Landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003
Dill KA. Polymer principles and protein folding. Protein Sci, 1999, 8: 1166–1180
Amadei A, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC. Essential dynamics of proteins. Protein Struct Funct Genet, 1993, 17: 412–425
Tao Y, Rao ZH, Liu SQ. Insight derived from molecular dynamics simulation into substrate-induced changes in protein motions of proteinase K. J Biomol Struct Dyn, 2010, 28: 143–157
Kapon R, Nevo R, Reich Z. Protein energy landscape roughness. Biochem Soc Trans, 2008, 36: 1404–1408
Dill KA, Ozkan SB, Weikl TR, Chodera JD, Voelz VA. The protein folding problem: when will it be solved? Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2007, 17: 342–346
Dill KA, Ozkan SB, Shell MS, Weikl TR. The protein folding problem. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 2008, 37: 289–316
Levinthal C. Are there pathways for protein folding? J Chim Phys, 1968, 65: 44–45
Yang LQ, Ji XL, Liu SQ. The free energy landscape of protein folding and dynamics: a global view. J Biomol Struc Dyn, 2013, 31: 982–992
Zwanzig R, Szabo A, Bagchi B. Levinthal’s paradox. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992, 89: 20–22
Li W, Qin M, Tie Z, Wang W. Effects of solvents on the intrinsic propensity of peptide backbone conformations. Phys Rev E, 2011, 84: 041933
Anfinsen CB, Haber E, Sela M, White FHJ. The kinetics of formation of native ribonuclease during oxidation of the reduced polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1961, 47: 1309–1314
Agashe VR, Shastry MCR, Udgaonkar JB. Initial hydrophobic collapse in the folding of barstar. Nature, 1995, 377: 754–757
Dill KA. Theory for the folding and stability of globular proteins. Biochemistry, 1985, 24: 1501–1509
Dill KA, Chan HS. From levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol, 1997, 4: 10–19
Leopold PE, Montal M, Onuchic JN. Protein folding funnels: a kinetic approach to the sequence-structure relationship. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992, 89: 8721–8725
Dobson CM. The nature and significance of protein folding. In: Pain RH, ed. Mechanisms of Protein Folding. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 1–33
Karplus M, Weaver DL. Protein-folding dynamics. Nature, 1976, 260: 404–406
Karplus M, Weaver DL. Protein folding dynamics: the diffusion-collision model and experimental data. Protein Sci, 1994, 3: 650–668
Kim PS, Baldwin RL. Specific intermediates in the folding reactions of small proteins and the mechanism of folding. Annu Rev Biochem, 1982, 51: 459–489
Nolting B, Agard DA. How general is the nucleation-condensation mechanism? Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf, 2008, 73: 754–764
Yan Z, Wang J, Zhang Y, Qin M, Wang W. Nucleation process in the folding of a domain-swapped dimer. Phys Rev E, 2010, 81: 021910
Dill KA, Fiebig KM, Chan HS. Cooperativity in protein-folding kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993, 90: 1942–1946
Dill KA, Bromberg S, Yue K, Fiebig KM, Yee DP, Thomas PD, Chan HS. Principles of protein folding-a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci, 1995, 4: 561–602
Sun L, Wang J, Wang W. Dissection of the Zipping-and-Assembly mechanism for folding of model proteins. Chin Phys Lett, 2010, 27: 038702
Harrison SC, Durbin R. Is there a single pathway for the folding of a polypeptide chain? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1985, 82: 4028–4030
Mittal A, Jayaram B, Shenoy SR, Bawa TS. A stoichiometry driven universal spatial organization of backbones of folded proteins: Are there chargaff’s rules for protein folding? J Biomol Struc Dyn, 2010, 28: 133–142
Ji XL, Liu SQ. Is stoichiometry-driven protein folding getting out of thermodynamic control? J Biomol Struct Dyn, 2011, 28: 621–623
Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Ann Rev Phys Chem, 1997, 48: 545–600
Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG, Luthey-Schulten Z, Socci ND. Towards an outline of the topography of a realistic protein folding funnel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1995, 92: 3626–3630
Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN, Thirumalai D. Navigating the folding routes. Science, 1995, 267: 1619–1620
Li W, Terakawa T, Wang W, Takada S. Energy landscape and multiroute folding of topologically complex proteins adenylate kinase and 2ouf-knot. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 17789–17794
Ben-Naim A. Levinthal’s question revisited, and answered. J Biomol Struct Dyn, 2012, 30: 113–124
Mezei M. Chameleon sequences in the pdb. Protein Eng, 1998, 11: 411–414
Minor DL, Kim PS. Context-dependent secondary structure formation of a designed protein sequence. Nature, 1996, 380: 730–734
Wolfenden R. Experimental measures of amino acid hydrophobicity and the topology of transmembrane and globular proteins. J Gen Physiol, 2007, 129: 357–362
Cordes MHJ, Davidsont AR, Sauer RT. Sequence space, folding and protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 1996, 6: 3–10
Kamtekar S, Schiffer JM, Xiong H, Babik JM, Hecht MH. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. Science, 1993, 262: 1680–1685
Hecht MH, Das A, Go A, Bradley LH, Wei Y. De novo proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci, 2004, 13: 1711–1723
Ansari A, Berendzen J, Bowne SF, Frauenfelder H, Iben IET, Sauke TB, Shyamsunder E, Young RD. Protein states and protein quakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1985, 82: 5000–5004
Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA. Structure of an HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the cd4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature, 1998, 393: 648–659
Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Majeed S, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA. Structures of HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoproteins from laboratory-adapted and primary isolates. Structure, 2000, 8: 1329–1339
Huang CC, Tang M, Zhang MY, Majeed S, Montabana E, Stanfield RL, Dimitrov DS, Korber B, Sodroski J, Wilson IA, Wyatt R, Kwong PD. Structure of a V3-containing HIV-1 gp120 core. Science, 2005, 310: 1025–1028
Huang CC, Lam SN, Acharya P, Tang M, Xiang SH, Hussan SS, Stanfield RL, Robinson J, Sodroski J, Wilson IA, Wyatt R, Bewley CA, Kwong PD. Structures of the CCR5 N terminus and of a tyrosine-sulfated antibody with HIV-1 gp120 and CD4. Science, 2007, 317: 1930–1934
Pancera M, Majeed S, Ban YA, Chen L, Huang CC, Kong L, Kwon YD, Stuckey J, Zhou T, Robinson JE, Schief WR, Sodroski J, Wyatt R, Kwong PD. Structure of HIV-1 gp120 with gp41-interactive region reveals layered envelope architecture and basis of conforma tional mobility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 1166–1171
Kwon YD, Finzi A, Wu X, Dogo-Isonagie C, Lee LK, Moore LR, Schmidt SD, Stuckey J, Yang Y, Zhou T, Zhu J, Vicic DA, Debnath AK, Shapiro L, Bewley CA, Mascola JR, Sodroski JG, Kwong PD. Unliganded HIV-1 gp120 core structures assume the CD4-bound conformation with regulation by quaternaryinteractions and variable loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 5663–5668
Chen B, Vogan EM, Gong H, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC, Harrison SC. Structure of an unliganded simian immunodeficiency virus gp120 core. Nature, 2005, 433: 834–841
Liu SQ, Fu YX, Liu CQ. Molecular motions and conformational transition between different conformational states of HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein. Chin Sci Bull, 2007, 52: 3074–3088
Liu SQ, Liu SX, Fu YX. Molecular motions of human HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoproteins. J Mol Model, 2008, 14: 857–870
Perozzo R, Folkers G, Scapozza L. Thermodynamics of protein-ligand interactions: history, presence, and future aspects. J Recept Signal Transduct Res, 2004, 24: 1–52
Ji XL, Liu SQ. Thinking into mechanism of protein folding and molecular binding. J Biomol Struct Dyn, 2011, 28: 995–996
Fischer E. Einfluss der configuration auf die wirkung der enzyme. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges, 1894, 27: 2984–2993
Koshland DEJ. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1958, 44: 98–104
Bosshard HR. Molecular recognition by induced fit: How fit is the concept? News Physiol Sci, 2001, 16: 171–173
Foote J, Milstein C. Conformational isomerism and the diversity of antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 10370–10374
Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102: 18908–18913
Changeux JP, Edelstein S. Conformational selection or induced fit? years of debate resolved. F1000 Biol Rep, 2011, 3: 19
Serban D, Taraboulos A, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Rapid detection of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and scrapie prion proteins. Neurology, 1990, 40: 110–117
Kosik KS. Alzheimer’s disease: a cell biological perspective. Science, 1992, 256: 780–783
Pan KM, Baldwin M, Nguyen J, Gasset M, Serban A, Groth D, Mehlhorn I, Huang Z, Fletterick RJ, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB. Conversion of a-helices into b-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993, 90: 10926–10966
Weinreb PH, Zhen W, Poon AW, Conway KA, Lansbury PTJ. Nacp, a protein implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry, 1996, 35: 13709–13715
Csermely P, Palotai R, Nussinov R. Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: an extended view of binding events. Trends Biochem Sci, 2010, 35: 539–546
Ma B, Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. Protein Eng, 1999, 12: 713–720
Tsai CJ, Xu D, Nussinov R. Protein folding via binding and vice versa. Fold Des, 1998, 3: R71–R80
Xie YH, Sang P, Tao Y, Liu SQ. Protein folding and binding funnels: a common driving force and a common mechanism. J Biomol Struc Dyn, 2013, 31(suppl 1): 100–101
Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Ma B, Nussinov R. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci, 1999, 8: 1181–1190
Xie YH, Tao Y, Liu SQ. Wonderful roles of the entropy in protein dynamics, binding and folding. J Biomol Struc Dyn, 2013, 31 (suppl 1): 98–100
Xu X, Su J, Chen W, Wang C. Thermal stability and unfolding pathways of Sso7d and its mutant F31A: insight from molecular dynamics simulation. J Biomol Struc Dyn, 2011, 28: 717–727
Liu SQ, Liu CQ, Fu YX. Molecular motions in HIV-1 gp120 mutants reveal their preferences for different conformations. J Mol Graphics Modell, 2007, 26: 306–318
Liu SQ, Meng ZH, Fu YX, Zhang KQ. Insights derived from molecular dynamics simulation into the molecular motions of serine protease proteinase K. J Mol Model, 2010, 16: 17–28
Liu S Q, Meng Z H, Fu Y X, Zhang K Q. The effect of calciums on the molecular motions of proteinase K. J Mol Model, 2011, 17: 289–300
Liu Y, Wang B, Wang C, Chen W. A new approach for protein design based on the relative entropy. Sci China Ser G, 2003, 46: 659–669
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Contributed equally to this work
This article is published with open access at link.springer.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Xie, Y., Liu, C. et al. Physicochemical bases for protein folding, dynamics, and protein-ligand binding. Sci. China Life Sci. 57, 287–302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4617-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4617-2