Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Quantifying competitive swim training using accelerometer-based activity monitors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent advances in miniaturized waterproof accelerometers have allowed their use as a tool in examining swim stroke characteristics (Ohgi et al. JPSE Int J 45:960–966, 2002; Sports Eng 6:113–123, 2003). A better use for this technology, however, might be to quantify characteristics of competitive swim training. The purpose of this study was thus to examine commercial accelerometers’ ability to track and quantify swim training variables common to all swim training programs: speed and distance. Swimmers (n = 43) were fitted with two accelerometer monitors on their right wrist and ankle. From this output, regression analyses were performed as a means to describe swim distance and speed. Ten additional swimmers (experimental group, n = 10) were then utilized to cross validate these equations as being useful to predict swim distance and speed. The results demonstrated a positive, significant relationship between activity counts and actual swim distance (r = 0.90, p < 0.05), actual swim speed (r = 0.80; p < 0.05), and cross validation confirmed the accuracy of the prediction equations. The findings of the present study suggest that commercial accelerometer-based activity monitors have the ability to quantify important characteristics of competitive swim training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colwin C (1969) On swimming. Pelham, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Counsilman JE (1968) The science of swimming. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maglischo EW (1993) Swimming even faster. Mountain View, California

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stager JM, Tanner DA (2005) Handbook of sports medicine: swimming, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Mathie MJ, Coster ACF, Lovell NH, Celler BG (2004) Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol Meas 25:R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedson P, Pober D, Janz K (2005) Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S523–S530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Payau MR, Adolph AL, Vohra FA, Zakeri I, Butte NF (2004) Prediction of activity energy expenditure using accelerometers in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1625–1631

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meijer EP, Goris AHC, Wouters L, Westerterp KR (2001) Physical inactivity as a determinant of physical activity level in the elderly. Int J Obesity 25:935–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Steele BG, Holt L, Belza B, Ferris SM, Lakshminaryan S, Buchner DM (2000) Quantitating physical activity in COPD using a triaxial accelerometer. Chest 117:1359–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keating XD, Guan J, Pinero JC, Bridges DM (2005) A meta-analysis of college students’ physical activity behaviors. J Am Coll Health 54:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohgi Y, Ichikawa H, Miyaji C (2002) Microcomputer-based acceleration sensor device for swimming stroke monitoring. JPSE Int J 45:960–966

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ohgi Y, Ichikawa H, Homma M, Miyaji C (2003) Stroke phase discrimination in breaststroke swimming using a tri-axial acceleration sensor device. Sports Eng 6:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davey N, Anderson M, James D (2008) Validation trial of an accelerometer-based sensor platform for swimming. Sports Technol 1:202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Sage T, Bindel A, Conway PP, Justham LM, Slawson SE, West AA (2011) Embedded programming and real-time signal processing of swimming stokes. Sports Eng 14:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tella MV, Madera J, Colado JC, Mateu J, Garcia-Masso X, Gonzalez LM (2010) A study about the 3D acceleration in front crawl and its relation with performance. In: Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming, XI edn. Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, pp 173–174

  16. Stamm A, Thiel DV, Burkett B, James DA (2011) Towards determining absolute velocity of freestyle swimming using 3-axis accelerometers. Procedia Eng 13:120–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dadashi F, Crettenand F, Millet GP, Aminian K (2012) Front-crawl instantaneous velocity estimation using a wearable inertial measurement unit. Sensors 12:12927–12939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mujika I, Chatard JC, Busso T, Geyssant A, Barale F, Lacoste L (1995) Effects of training on performance in competitive swimming. Can J Appl Physiol 20:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart AM, Hopkins WG (1997) Swimmers’ compliance with training prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:1389–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toussaint HM, Hollander AP (1994) Energetics of competitive swimming. Implications for training programmes. Sports Med 18:384–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen K, Bassett DR (2005) The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S490–S500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Esliger DW, Tremblay MS (2006) Technical reliability: assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:2173–2181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnston, J (2006) Estimation of energy expended while swimming utilizing an omnidirectional accelerometer. Indiana University, p 275

  24. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bland MJ, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Butcher W (1975) The influence of the leg kick and the arm stroke on the total speed during the crawl stroke. Swimming II, University Park, Maryland, pp 180–187

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pendergast DR, Prampero PE, Craig AB, Wilson DR, Rennie DW (1977) Quantitative analysis of the front crawl in men and women. J Appl Physiol 43:475–479

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Philips Healthcare and USA Swimming for their support during this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian V. Wright.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, B.V., Stager, J.M. Quantifying competitive swim training using accelerometer-based activity monitors. Sports Eng 16, 155–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-013-0123-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-013-0123-1

Keywords