Abstract
Building a collaborative trusting relationship with users is crucial in a wide range of applications, such as advice-giving or financial transactions, and some minimal degree of cooperativeness is required in all applications to even initiate and maintain an interaction with a user. Despite the importance of this aspect of human–human relationships, few intelligent systems have tried to build user models of trust, credibility, or other similar interpersonal variables, or to influence these variables during interaction with users. Humans use a variety of kinds of social language, including small talk, to establish collaborative trusting interpersonal relationships. We argue that such strategies can also be used by intelligent agents, and that embodied conversational agents are ideally suited for this task given the myriad multimodal cues available to them for managing conversation. In this article we describe a model of the relationship between social language and interpersonal relationships, a new kind of discourse planner that is capable of generating social language to achieve interpersonal goals, and an actual implementation in an embodied conversational agent. We discuss an evaluation of our system in which the use of social language was demonstrated to have a significant effect on users’ perceptions of the agent’s knowledgableness and ability to engage users, and on their trust, credibility, and how well they felt the system knew them, for users manifesting particular personality traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, P. and Guerrero, L.: 1998, The Bright Side of Relational Communication: Interpersonal Warmth as a Social Emotion. In: P. Andersen and L. Guerrero (eds.), Handbook of Communication and Emotion, New York: Academic Press, pp. 303–329.
Andre, E., Muller, J. and Rist, T.: 1996, The PPP Persona: A Multipurpose Animated Presentation Agent, Advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM Press, pp. 245–247.
Ardissono, L., Boella, G. and Lesmo, L.: 1999, Politeness and speech acts, Proceedings of the Workshop on Attitudes, Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction at the 7th International Conference on User Modeling (UM’ 99), Banff, Canada.
Argyle, M.:1990, The biological basis of rapport. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 297–300.
Bagchi, S., Biswas, G. and Kawamura, K.: 1996, Interactive task planning under uncertainty and goal changes. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 18, 157–167.
Ball, G. and Breese, J.: 2000, Emotion and Personality in a Conversational Agent. In: J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost and E. Churchill (eds.), Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 189–219.
Berscheid, E. and Reis, H.: 1998, Attraction and Close Relationships. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 193–281.
Beskow, J. and McGlashan, S.: 1997, Olga - A Conversational Agent with Gestures, Proceedings of the IJCAI’97 Workshop on Animated Interface Agents - Making them Intelligent, August 1997, Nagoya, Japan.
Brown, J.R. and Rogers, E.L.: 1991, Openness, Uncertainty and Intimacy: An epistemological reformulation. In: N. Coupland, H. Giles and J.M. Wiemann (eds.), Miscommunication and problematic talk, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 146–165.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.: 1978, Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: E. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–311.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A.: 1972, The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: P. Giglioli (ed.), Language and Social Context, Harmondsworth: Penguin., pp. 252–282.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A.: 1989, Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18, 159–212.
Buck, R.: 1993, The spontaneous communication of interpersonal expectations. In: P.D. Blanck (ed.), Interpersonal expectations: Theory, research, and applications, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–241.
Cassell, J. and Bickmore, T.: 2000, External Manifestations of Trustworthiness in the Interface. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 50–56.
Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjalmsson, H. and Yan, H.,1999, Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: Rea, Proceedings of CHI 99 Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 520–527.
Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Vilhjàlmsson, H. and Yan, H.: 2000, More Than Just a Pretty Face: Affordances of Embodiment, Proceedings of IUI 2000, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 52–59.
Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E.: 2000, Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Castelfranchi, C. and de Rosis, F.: 1999, Which User Model do we need, to relax the hypothesis of ‘sincere Assertion’ in HCI?, Proceedings of the Workshop on Attitudes, Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction at the 7th International Conference on User Modeling (UM’ 99), Banff, Canada.
Cegala, D., Waldro, V., Ludlum, J., McCabe, B., Yost, S. and Teboul, B.: 1988, A study of interactants’ thoughts and feelings during conversation., Ninth Annual Conference on Discourse Analysis, Philadelphia, PA.
Cheepen, C.: 1988, The Predictability of Informal Conversation. New York: Pinter.
Clark, H.H.: 1996, Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dehn, D.M. and van Mulken, S. (in press): The Impact of Animated Interface Agents: A Review of Empirical Research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51, pp. 1–22.
Depaulo, B. and Friedman, H.: 1998, Nonverbal Communication. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 3–40.
Drummond, M. and Bresina, J.: 1990, Anytime synthetic projection: Maximizing the probability of goal satisfaction, AAAI-90, pp. 138–144.
Fikes, R. and Nilsson, N.: 1971, STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 5(2), 189–208.
Fogg, B.J.: 1999, Persuasive Technologies, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, pp. 27–29.
Fogg, B.J. and Tseng, H.: 1999, The Elements of Computer Credibility, CHI 99, Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press, pp. 80–87.
Goetz, P.: 1997, Attractors in Recurrent Behavior Networks. PhD Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Goffman, I.: 1967, On face-work, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, New York: Pantheon, pp. 5–46.
Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hanks, S.: 1994, Discourse Planning: Technical Challenges for the Planning Community., AAAI Workshop on Planning for Inter-Agent Communication. Seattle, WA.
Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N.: 1999, The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.
Jefferson, G.: 1978, Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, New York: Academic Press, pp. 219–248.
Lester, J., Voerman, J., Towns, S. and Callaway, C.: 1999, ‘Deictic Believability: Coordinating Gesture, Locomotion, and Speech in Lifelike Pedagogical Agents’. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4-5), 383–414.
Maes, P.: 1989, How to do the right thing. Connection Science Journal, 1(3), 291–323.
Malinowski, B.: 1923, The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In: C.K. Ogden and I.A. Richards (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning, Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 296–336.
Mark, G. and Becker, B.: 1999, Designing believable interaction by applying social conventions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13, 297–320.
Moon, Y.: 1998, Intimate self-disclosure exchanges: Using computers to build reciprocal relationships with consumers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Report: 99-059.
Morkes, J., Kernal, H. and Nass, C.: 1998, Humor in Task-Oriented Computer-Mediated Communication and Human-Computer Interaction, CHI 98, Los Angeles, CA: ACM Press, pp. 215–216.
Nass, C. and Lee, K.: 2000, Does Computer-Generated Speech Manifest Personality? An Experimental Test of Similarity-Attraction, CHI 2000, The Hague, Amsterdam: ACM Press, pp. 329–336.
Oviatt, S.: 1996, User-Centered Modeling for Spoken Language and Multimodal Interfaces. IEEE MultiMedia, 1996, 26–35.
Pautler, D.: 1998, A Computational Model of Social Perlocutions, COLING/ACL, Montreal.
Picard, R.: 1997, Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 1020–1026.
Reeves, B. and Nass, C.: 1996, The Media Equation: how people treat computers, televisions and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Resnick, P.V. and Lammers, H.B.: 1985, The Influence of Self-esteem on Cognitive Responses to Machine-Like Versus Human-Like Computer Feedback. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(6), 761–769.
Rich, C. and Sidner, C.L.: 1997, COLLAGEN: When Agents Collaborate with People, Autonomous Agents 97, Marina Del Rey, CA, pp. 284–291.
Rich, E.: 1979, User Modeling via Stereotypes. Cognitive Science, 3, 329–354.
Rickel, J. and Johnson, W.L.: 1998, Animated Agents for Procedural Traning in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition and Motor Control. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(4-5), 343–382.
Rickenberg, R. and Reeves, B.: 2000, The Effects of Animated Characters on Anxiety, Task Performance, and Evaluations of User Interfaces, CHI 2000, The Hague, Amsterdam, pp. 49–56.
Sacks, H.: 1995, Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell
Schneider, K.P.: 1987, Topic selection in phatic communication. Multilingua, 6(3), 247–256.
Schneider, K.P.: 1988, Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.
Searle, J.:1969, Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, H.:1996, Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 1–24.
Stone, M. and Doran, C.: 1997, Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree-Adjoining Grammar, ACL Madrid, Spain: MIT Press, pp. 198–205.
Svennevig, J.:1999, Getting acquainted in Conversation. Philadephia: John Benjamins.
Thorisson, K.R.:1997, Gandalf: An Embodied Humanoid Capable of Real-Time Multimodal Dialogue with People, Autonomous Agents’ 97, p. 536–537, Marina del Rey, CA.
Tracy, K. and Coupland, N.:1991, Multiple goals in discourse: An overview of issues. In: K. Tracy and N. Coupland (eds.), Multiple goals in discourse Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–13.
Ward, N.:1997, Responsiveness in Dialog and Priorities for Language Research. Systems and Cybernetics, Special Issue on Embodied Artificial Intelligence, 28, 521–533.
Wheeless, L. and Grotz, J.:1977, The Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship to Self-Disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250–257.
Wiggins, J.:1979, A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 395–412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cassell, J., Bickmore, T. Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents. User Model User-Adap Inter 13, 89–132 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024026532471
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024026532471