Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of merleau-ponty's phenomenology

Published: 11 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

In 2001, Paul Dourish proposed the term embodied interaction to describe a new paradigm for interaction design that focuses on the physical, bodily, and social aspects of our interaction with digital technology. Dourish used Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of perception as the theoretical basis for his discussion of the bodily nature of embodied interaction. This article extends Dourish's work to introduce the human-computer interaction community to ideas related to Merleau-Ponty's concept of the lived body. It also provides a detailed analysis of two related topics: (1) embodied perception: the active and embodied nature of perception, including the body's ability to extent its sensory apparatus through digital technology; and (2) kinaesthetic creativity: the body's ability to relate in a direct and creative fashion with the “feel” dimension of interactive products during the design process.

References

[1]
Aho, K. A. 2009. Heidegger's Neglect of the Body. State University of New York Press, New York.
[2]
Alsos, O. A., Das, A., and Svanæs, D. 2011. Mobile health IT: The effect of user interface and form factor on doctor-patient communication. Int. J. Med. Inform. 81, 1, 12--28.
[3]
Antle, A. N., Corness, G., and Droumeva, M. 2009. What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interact. Comput. 21, 1--2, 66--75.
[4]
Bødker, S. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM Press, New York, 1--8.
[5]
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. 1983. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
[6]
Deckers, E., Wensveen, S., Ahn, R., and Overbeeke, K. 2011. Designing for perceptual crossing to improve user involvement. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 1929--1938.
[7]
Dourish, P. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[8]
Dreyfus, H. L. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division I. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[9]
Eagleman, D. M. and Sejnowski, T. J. 2000. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Sci. 287, 5460, 2036--2038.
[10]
Ehn, P. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetlivscentrum, Stockholm, Sweden.
[11]
Fallman, D. 2003. In romance with the materials of mobile interaction: A phenomenological approach to the design of mobile information technology. Ph.D. thesis, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
[12]
Fallman, D. 2011. The new good: Exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, NY, 1051--1060.
[13]
Gallagher, S. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press, New York.
[14]
Gaver, W. 1992. The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'92). ACM Press, New York, 17--24.
[15]
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
[16]
Harrison, S., Sengers, P., and Tatar, D. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interact. Comput. 23, 5, 385--392.
[17]
Heidegger, M. 1927. Being and Time. SUNY Press, Albany, NY. Republished 1996.
[18]
Heidegger, M. and Boss, M. 2001. Zollikon Seminars: Protocols - Conversations - Letters. Northwestern University Press, Chicago, IL.
[19]
Höök, K. 2009. Affective loop experiences: Designing for interactional embodiment. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 364, 1535, 3585--3595.
[20]
Hornecker, E. 2011. The role of physicality in tangible and embodied interactions. Interact. Mag. 18, 2, 19--23.
[21]
Hornecker, E. and Buur, J. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 437--446.
[22]
Ihde, D. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
[23]
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[24]
Heath, C. C. and Luff, P. 1991. Collaborative activity and technological design: Task coordination in london underground control rooms. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW'91). Kluwer, 65--80.
[25]
Kim, J. H. and Seifert, U. 2007. Embodiment and agency: Towards an aesthetics of interactive performativity. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Sound and Music Computing (SMC'07). 230--237.
[26]
Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B., and Takayama, L. 2006. How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM Press, New York, 140--149.
[27]
Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., and Wensveen, S. 2011. Design Research Through Practice - From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
[28]
Kumar, M. and Winograd, T. 2007. Gaze-Enhanced scrolling techniques. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM Press, New York, 213--216.
[29]
Laban, R. and Ullmann, L. 1963. Modern Educational Dance. MacDonald and Evans, London, UK.
[30]
Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T., and Edwards, J. 2006. How it feels, not just how it looks: When bodies interact with technology. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments. ACM Press, New York, 329--332.
[31]
Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T., and Edwards, J. 2007. The feel dimension of technology interaction: Exploring tangibles through movement and touch. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. ACM Press, New York, 271--278.
[32]
Leontjev, A. N. 1978. Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[33]
Levisohn, A. and Gromala, D. 2009. Taro (t) ception: Eliciting embodied, interoceptive awareness through interactive art. In Proceedings of Digital Arts and Culture Conference.
[34]
Loke, L. 2009. Moving and making strange: A design methodology for movement-based interactive technologies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology, Sydney.
[35]
Loke, L. and Robertson, T. 2011. The lived body in design: Mapping the terrain. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. ACM Press, New York, 181--184.
[36]
Mccullough, M. 2005. Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[37]
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK.
[38]
Michelman, E. 2011. http://www.ericmic.com/historyofthescrollwheel.htm.
[39]
Moen, J. 2005. Towards people based movement interaction and kinaesthetic interaction experiences. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility. ACM Press, New York, 121--124.
[40]
Norman, D. A. 1988. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.
[41]
O'hara, K. and Sellen, A. 1997. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 335--342.
[42]
Overbeeke, K. C. J. 2011. Designing dreams. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity (CHItaly'11). ACM Press, New York, 9--10.
[43]
Pearson, J., Buchanan, G., and Thimbley, H. 2010. HCI design principles for ereaders. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Research Advances in Large Digital Book Repositories and Complementary Media. ACM Press, New York, 15--24.
[44]
Raudsandmoen, H. and Rødsjø, B. 2012. Empirically based design guidelines for gaze interaction in Windows 7. M.S. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
[45]
Robertson, T. 1997. Cooperative work and lived cognition: A taxonomy of embodied actions. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 205--220.
[46]
Robertson, T. 2002. The public availability of actions and artefacts. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 11, 3, 299--316.
[47]
Rogers, Y. 2004. New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 38, 1, 87--143.
[48]
Schiphorst, T. and Kozel, S. 2002. Pulp fashion | wearable archi{ves}tectures. Online essay. http://www.sfu.ca/~tschipho/PhD/Thecla_Schiphorst_PhD_Appendix_F.pdf.
[49]
Suchman, L. A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[50]
Svanæs, D. 1993. Interaction is orthogonal to graphical form. In INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York.
[51]
Svanæs, D. 1997. Kinaesthetic thinking: The tacit dimension of interaction design. Comput. Hum. Behav. 13, 4, 443--463.
[52]
Svanæs, D. 2000. Understanding interactivity - Steps to a phenomenology of human-computer interaction. Ph.D. thesis, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. http://dag.idi.ntnu.no/interactivity.pdf.
[53]
Svanæs, D. 2001. Context-Aware technology: A phenomenological perspective. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 16, 2-4, 379--400.
[54]
Svanæs, D. and Seland, G. 2004. Putting the users center stage: Role playing and low-fi prototyping enable end users to design mobile systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 479--486.
[55]
Toombs, S. K. 2002. Reflections on bodily change: The lived experience of disability. In Handbook of Phenomenology and Medicine, S. K. Toombs, Ed. Kluwer Acedemic Press, The Netherlands, 247--261.
[56]
Van Dijk, J. 2009. Cognition is not what it used to be: Reconsidering usability from an embodied embedded cognition perspective. Hum. Technol. 5, 1, 29--46.
[57]
Vogt, S. and Magnussen, S. 2007. Expertise in pictorial perception: Eye-Movement patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen. Percept. 36, 1, 91--100.
[58]
Webster, 2012. Dictionary homepage. http://www.merriam-webster.com/
[59]
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.
[60]
Yarbus, A. L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press, New York.
[61]
Young, W. 2010. Motion sensors in physical therapy. M.S. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. http://daim.idi.ntnu.no.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Towards understanding the design of playful bodily extensions via body schema and body imageInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103457(103457)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)Lived experience in human-building interaction (HBI): an initial frameworkFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.12339045Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Se deg om i vredeNorsk sosiologisk tidsskrift10.18261/nost.8.6.28:6(9-26)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of merleau-ponty's phenomenology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
    ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 20, Issue 1
    Special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design
    March 2013
    171 pages
    ISSN:1073-0516
    EISSN:1557-7325
    DOI:10.1145/2442106
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 April 2013
    Accepted: 01 December 2012
    Revised: 01 December 2012
    Received: 01 October 2011
    Published in TOCHI Volume 20, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Interaction design
    2. Merleau-Ponty
    3. embodied interaction
    4. embodied perception
    5. kinaesthetic creativity
    6. phenomenology
    7. the lived body

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)394
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)57
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Towards understanding the design of playful bodily extensions via body schema and body imageInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103457(103457)Online publication date: Feb-2025
    • (2024)Lived experience in human-building interaction (HBI): an initial frameworkFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2023.12339045Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Se deg om i vredeNorsk sosiologisk tidsskrift10.18261/nost.8.6.28:6(9-26)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Shifting Ambiguity, Collapsing Indeterminacy: Designing with Data as Baradian ApparatusACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/368904331:6(1-41)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Intercorporeal Design: Dissolving Self-Other Dualism in Interaction DesignProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686206(1-9)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The Inbetweeny Collective: Reflexive Dialogues on the Liminality of Researchers' Lived ExperiencesProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686204(1-10)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
    • (2024)The Deep Body: Exploring users' insides through design fictionProceedings of the 27th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3681716.3681743(325-329)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
    • (2024)More-than-Human Perspectives in Human-Computer Interaction Research: A Scoping ReviewProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685408(1-18)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)New Perspectives for Phenomenology in Interaction DesignProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685404(1-7)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)AMoRE: Four Perspectives on Talking About and Experiencing RobotsProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685342(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media