Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence
Stéphane Robin (),
Agnieszka Rusinowska and
Marie Claire Villeval
Additional contact information
Stéphane Robin: GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne - Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon - Saint-Etienne - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
We provide experimental evidence of worker's ingratiation by opinion conformity and of managers' discrimination in favor of workers with whom they share similar opinions. In our Baseline, managers can observe both workers' performance at a task and opinions before assigning unequal payoffs. In the Ingratiation treatment, workers can change their opinion after learning that held by manager. In the Random treatment, workers can also change opinion but payoffs are assigned randomly, which gives a measure of non-strategic opinion conformism. We find evidence of high ingratiation indices, as overall, ingratiation is effective. Indeed, managers rewards opinion conformity, and even more so when opinions cannot be manipulated. Additional treatments reveal that ingratiation is cost sensitive and that the introduction of performance pay for managers as well as a less noisy measure of performance increase the role of relative performance in the assignment of payoffs, without eliminating the reward of opinion conformity.
Keywords: experiment; social distance; discrimination; favoritism; opinion conformity; ingratiation; distance sociale; expérience; favoritisme; conformité d'opinion; flagornerie (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-05
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00706791v1
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Published in 2012
Downloads: (external link)
https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00706791v1/document (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c68/34c68fcf2bbd5f268a59feb5f9dc17ed36c42107" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c68/34c68fcf2bbd5f268a59feb5f9dc17ed36c42107" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c68/34c68fcf2bbd5f268a59feb5f9dc17ed36c42107" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c68/34c68fcf2bbd5f268a59feb5f9dc17ed36c42107" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c68/34c68fcf2bbd5f268a59feb5f9dc17ed36c42107" alt="Downloads"
Working Paper: Ingratiation and Favoritism: Experimental Evidence (2012) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c68/34c68fcf2bbd5f268a59feb5f9dc17ed36c42107" alt="Downloads"
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00706791
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().