Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Archaeological theory: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

4 July 2024

12 June 2024

1 April 2024

6 July 2023

30 June 2023

11 May 2023

  • curprev 06:1606:16, 11 May 2023 Grachester talk contribs 22,570 bytes −9,120 Revert vandalism undo Tag: Manual revert
  • curprev 06:1506:15, 11 May 2023 2402:3a80:19e6:dd64::2 talk 31,690 bytes +1,361 The impact of ideology: Archaeology has been and remains a cultural, gender and political battlefield. Many groups have tried to use archaeology to prove some current cultural or political point. Marxist or Marxist-influenced archaeologists in the USSR and the UK (among others) often try to prove the truth of dialectical materialism or to highlight the past (and present) role of conflict between interest groups (e.g. male vs. female, elders vs. juniors, workers vs. owners) in generating s... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 06:1506:15, 11 May 2023 2402:3a80:19e6:dd64::2 talk 30,329 bytes +483 Development: In 1973, David Clarke of Cambridge University published an academic paper in Antiquity claiming that as a discipline, archaeology had moved from its original "noble innocence" through to "self-consciousness" and then onto "critical self-consciousness", a symptom of which was the increasing recognition and emphasis on archaeological theory. As a result, he argued, archaeology had suffered a "loss of innocence" as archaeologists became sceptical of the work of their forebears.[17] undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 06:1506:15, 11 May 2023 2402:3a80:19e6:dd64::2 talk 29,846 bytes +816 Global scope: This divergence of archaeological theory has not progressed identically in all parts of the world where archaeology is conducted or in the many sub-fields of the discipline. Traditional heritage attractions often retain an ostensibly straightforward Culture History element in their interpretation material whilst university archaeology departments provide an environment to explore more abstruse methods of understanding and explaining the past. Australian archaeologists, and m... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 06:1406:14, 11 May 2023 2402:3a80:19e6:dd64::2 talk 29,030 bytes +2,139 Cultural-historical (historical particularism, national archaeology) archaeology (c1860-present): Developments in the 19th century with Hutton and Lyell's theory of uniformitarianism and Darwin's theory of natural selection set the stage for the modern scientific investigation into the origin of humanity.[13] After Darwin came a mode of archaeology known as cultural, or culture history, according to which sites are grouped into distinct "cultures" to determine the geographic spread and t... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 06:1406:14, 11 May 2023 2402:3a80:19e6:dd64::2 talk 26,891 bytes +964 Antiquarianism (antiquities collection) and Imperial synthesis (ancient times through c1880): People's interest of the past has existed since antiquity. During the Western world's Medieval period six main concepts were formed that would come to influence archaeological theory to some degree 1) The world is of recent, supernatural origin at best no more than a few thousand years old 2) The physical world has degraded since God's original creation 3) Humanity was created in the Garden of... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 06:1306:13, 11 May 2023 2402:3a80:19e6:dd64::2 talk 25,927 bytes +1,361 Background: Since the early 20th century, most accounts of archaeological methodology have accepted the data that is uncovered by the archaeologist is subsequently interpreted through a theoretical viewpoint.[4] Nevertheless, the archaeological community is divided over the extent to which theory pervades the discipline. On one side, there are those who believe that certain archaeological techniques – such as excavation or recording – are neutral and outside of the bounds of theory, while... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 06:1306:13, 11 May 2023 2402:3a80:19e6:dd64::2 talk 24,566 bytes +1,996 Archaeological theory refers to the various intellectual frameworks through which archaeologists interpret archaeological data. Archaeological theory functions as the application of philosophy of science to archaeology, and is occasionally referred to as philosophy of archaeology. There is no one singular theory of archaeology, but many, with different archaeologists believing that information should be interpreted in different ways. Throughout the history of the discipline, various trends of... undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

22 April 2023

8 April 2023

14 March 2023

17 February 2023

30 January 2023

22 November 2022

26 August 2022

6 June 2022

23 May 2022

8 May 2022

19 December 2021

10 December 2021

20 November 2021

30 September 2021

31 May 2021

31 January 2021

2 December 2020

15 July 2020

14 June 2020

18 April 2020

21 February 2020

26 September 2019

31 July 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)