Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Archosauromorpha: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Standardize whitespace in favor of built-in padding - see Template talk:Clade#Whitespace around labels (via WP:JWB)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 10:
| subdivision = *{{extinct}}''[[Aenigmastropheus]]''
*{{extinct}}''[[Elachistosuchus]]''?
*{{extinct}}''[[Lusitanosaurus]]''?
*{{extinct}}''[[Prolacertoides]]''
*{{extinct}}[[Choristodera]]?
Line 41 ⟶ 42:
The advent of [[cladistics]] helped to sort out at least some of the relationships within Reptilia, and it became clear that there was a split between the archosaur lineage and the lepidosaur lineage somewhere within the Permian, with certain reptiles clearly closer to archosaurs and others allied with lepidosaurs. [[Jacques Gauthier]] reused the term Archosauromorpha for the archosaur lineage at the 1982 annual meeting of the [[Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology|American Society of Zoologists]], and later used it within his 1984 Ph.D. thesis.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|author1=Jacques Gauthier |author2=Arnold G. Kluge |author3=Timothy Rowe | title = Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils | journal = [[Cladistics (journal)|Cladistics]] | volume = 4 | issue = 2 | pages = 105–209 | date = 1988 | doi = 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00514.x |pmid=34949076 |hdl=2027.42/73857 |s2cid=83502693 |url=https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73857/1/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00514.x.pdf | hdl-access = free }}</ref> Archosauromorpha, as formulated by Gauthier, included four main groups of reptiles: Rhynchosauria, "Prolacertiformes", "Trilophosauria", and [[Archosauria]] (now equivalent to the group [[Archosauriformes]]). Cladistic analyses created during the 1980s by Gauthier, [[Michael Benton|Michael J. Benton]], and [[Susan E. Evans]] implemented Gauthier's classification scheme within large studies of reptile relations.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Benton|first=Michael J.|date=1985-06-01|title=Classification and phylogeny of the diapsid reptiles|url=https://www.academia.edu/10694425|journal=Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society|language=en|volume=84|issue=2|pages=97–164|doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01796.x|issn=0024-4082}}</ref><ref name=":2" /><ref name=":3">{{Cite book|title=The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Volume 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds|last=Evans|first=Susan E.|publisher=Clarendon Press|year=1988|editor-last=Benton|editor-first=M. J.|location=Oxford|pages=221–260|chapter=The early history and relationships of the Diapsida|chapter-url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228117622}}</ref>
 
[[Michel Laurin]] (1991) defined Archosauromorpha as thea [[Node-based taxon|node-based]] clade containing the [[most recent common ancestor]] of ''[[Prolacerta]]'', ''[[Trilophosaurus]]'', ''[[Hyperodapedon]]'' and all of its descendants.<ref name="Apsisaurus">{{Cite journal|author=Michel Laurin |year=1991 |title=The osteology of a Lower Permian eosuchian from Texas and a review of diapsid phylogeny |journal=Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society |volume=101 |issue=1 |pages=59–95 |doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.1991.tb00886.x }}</ref> David Dilkes (1998) formulated a more inclusive (and currently more popularcommon) definition of Archosauromorpha, defining it as thea [[Branch-based taxon|branch-based]] [[total group]] clade containing ''[[Protorosaurus]]'' and all other [[sauria]]ns that are more closely related to ''Protorosaurus'' than to Lepidosauria.<ref name="Dilkes98">{{cite journal|author=David M. Dilkes|year=1998|title=The Early Triassic rhynchosaur ''Mesosuchus browni'' and the interrelationships of basal archosauromorph reptiles|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B|volume=353|issue=1368|pages=501–541|doi=10.1098/rstb.1998.0225|pmc=1692244}}</ref> Gauthier, as an author for ''[[Phylonyms]]'' (2020), redefined Archosauromorpha as a node-based clade containing ''[[Chicken|Gallus]], [[Alligator]], [[Mesosuchus]], Trilophosaurus, Prolacerta,'' and ''Protorosaurus''. The new name '''Pan-Archosauria''' was established for the broader total group of Archosauromorpha, similar to the definition of Dilkes (1998).<ref name=":12">{{Cite book |last1=Gauthier |first1=Jacques A. |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9780429446276/phylonyms-kevin-de-queiroz-philip-cantino-jacques-gauthier |title=Phylonyms: A Companion to the PhyloCode |publisher=CRC Press |year=2020 |isbn=9780429446276 |editor-last1=De Queiroz |editor-first1=Kevin |edition=1st |location=Boca Raton |chapter=Archosauromorpha F. von Huene 1946 [J. A. Gauthier], converted clade name |doi=10.1201/9780429446276 |editor-last2=Cantino |editor-first2=Philip |editor-last3=Gauthier |editor-first3=Jacques |s2cid=242704712}}</ref>
 
In 2016, [[Martin Ezcurra]] named a subgroup of Archosauromorpha, '''Crocopoda''' ("crocodile feet"). Crocopoda is defined as all archosauromorphs more closely related to allokotosaurs (specifically ''[[Azendohsaurus]]'' and ''[[Trilophosaurus]]''), rhynchosaurs (specifically ''[[Rhynchosaurus]]''), or archosauriforms (specifically ''Proterosuchus'') rather than ''Protorosaurus'' or tanystropheids (specifically ''[[Tanystropheus]]''). This group roughly corresponds to Laurin's definition of Archosauromorpha.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|last=Ezcurra|first=Martín D.|date=2016-04-28|title=The phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs, with an emphasis on the systematics of proterosuchian archosauriforms|journal=PeerJ|language=en|volume=4|pages=e1778|doi=10.7717/peerj.1778|pmid=27162705|pmc=4860341|issn=2167-8359 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Line 60 ⟶ 61:
Apart from these four groups, Archosauromorpha is sometimes considered to encompass several additional groups of reptiles. One of the most common additions is [[Choristodera]], a group of semiaquatic reptiles with mysterious origins. Although choristodere fossils are only known from the [[Jurassic]] through the [[Miocene]], it is theorized that they first appeared during the Permian alongside the earliest archosauromorphs. Choristoderes share numerous otherwise unique traits with archosauromorphs, but they share an equal or greater number of unique traits with lepidosauromorphs as well, so there is still some debate over their inclusion within either group.<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":1" /> The [[chameleon]]- or [[tamandua]]-like [[drepanosaur]]s are also semi-regularly placed within Archosauromorpha,<ref name="Dilkes98" /> although some studies have considered them to be part of a much more basal lineage of reptiles.<ref name=":02">{{Cite journal|last1=Pritchard|first1=Adam C.|last2=Nesbitt|first2=Sterling J.|date=2017-10-01|title=A bird-like skull in a Triassic diapsid reptile increases heterogeneity of the morphological and phylogenetic radiation of Diapsida|journal=Royal Society Open Science|language=en|volume=4|issue=10|pages=170499|doi=10.1098/rsos.170499|pmid=29134065|pmc=5666248|issn=2054-5703|bibcode=2017RSOS....470499P}}</ref> The aquatic [[thalattosaur]]s<ref name=":3" /> and gliding [[Kuehneosauridae|kuehneosaurids]]<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":02" /> are also irregularly considered archosauromorphs.
 
Genetic studies have found evidence that modern testudines ([[turtle]]s and [[tortoise]]s) are more closely related to crocodilians than to lizards.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Bhart-Anjan S. Bhullar |author2=Gabe S. Bever |year=2009 |title=An archosaur-like laterosphenoid in early turtles (Reptilia: Pantestudines) |journal=Breviora |volume=518 |pages=1–11 |url=http://www.mcz.harvard.edu/Publications/pubs/Breviora_2009_0518_2476.pdf |doi=10.3099/0006-9698-518.1.1|s2cid=42333056 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|author1=Sean Modesto |author2=Robert Reisz |author3=Diane Scott |year=2011 |title=A neodiapsid reptile from the Lower Permian of Oklahoma |journal=Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts |page=160}}</ref> If this evidence is accurate, then turtles are part of basal Archosauromorpha. Likewise, extinct turtle relatives known as [[Pantestudines]] would also fall within Archosauromorpha. Some geneticists have proposed a name to refer to reptiles within the group formed by relatives of turtles and archosaurs. This name is the clade '''[[Archelosauria]]'''. Since Pantestudines may encompass the entire aquatic reptile order [[Sauropterygia]], this means that Archosauromorpha (as Archelosauria) may be a much wider group than commonly believed.<ref>{{Cite journal|author=John W. Merck |year=1997 |title=A phylogenetic analysis of the euryapsid reptiles |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=17 |issue=Supplement to 3 |pages=1–93 | doi = 10.1080/02724634.1997.10011028}}</ref> However, anatomical data disagrees with this genetic evidence, instead placing Pantestudines within Lepidosauromorpha<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Rieppel|first=Olivier|date=1999-02-12|title=Turtle Origins|journal=Science|language=en|volume=283|issue=5404|pages=945–946|doi=10.1126/science.283.5404.945|pmid=10075558|s2cid=42475241|issn=1095-9203}}</ref> but many modern studies have supported Archelosauria. Several recent studies place sauropterygians within Archosauromorpha group, forming a large clade including [[Ichthyosauromorpha]] and [[Thalattosauria]] as opposed to the Pantestudine relations.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Neenan | first1 = J. M. | last2 = Klein | first2 = N. | last3 = Scheyer | first3 = T. M. | title = European origin of placodont marine reptiles and the evolution of crushing dentition in Placodontia | doi = 10.1038/ncomms2633 | journal = Nature Communications | volume = 4 | pages = 1621 | year = 2013 | pmid = 23535642| bibcode = 2013NatCo...4.1621N | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Simões |first1=T. |last2=Kammerer |first2=C. |date=August 2022 |title=Successive climate crises in the deep past drove the early evolution and radiation of reptiles |journal=ScienceAdvancesScience Advances |volume=08 |issue=33 |pages= eabq1898|doi=10.1126/sciadv.abq1898 |pmid=35984885 |pmc=9390993 |bibcode=2022SciA....8.1898S |s2cid=251694019 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wang |first1=W. |last2=Shang |first2=Q. |date=December 2022 |title=Ancestral body plan and adaptive radiation of sauropterygian marine reptiles |journal= iScience|volume=25 |issue=12 |pages= |doi=10.1016/j.isci.2022.105635 |pmid=36483013 |pmc=9722468 |bibcode=2022iSci...25j5635W }}</ref>
 
== Anatomy ==
Line 102 ⟶ 103:
|2={{clade
|1={{extinct}}''[[Odontochelys]]''
|label2=&nbsp;[[Testudinata]]&nbsp;
|2={{clade
|1={{extinct}}''[[Proganochelys]]''
Line 126 ⟶ 127:
|1=[[Lepidosauromorpha]][[File:British reptiles, amphibians, and fresh-water fishes (1920) (Lacerta agilis).jpg|80px]]
|2={{extinct}}[[Choristodera]][[File:Champsosaurus BW flipped.jpg|80px]]
|label3=&nbsp;'''Archosauromorpha'''&nbsp;
|3={{clade
|1={{clade
Line 134 ⟶ 135:
|2={{clade
|1={{extinct}}[[Tanystropheidae]] [[File:Macrocnemus BW.jpg|80px]]
|label2=&nbsp;'''Crocopoda'''&nbsp;
|2={{clade
|label1={{extinct}}[[Allokotosauria]]
Line 168 ⟶ 169:
[[Category:Guadalupian first appearances]]
[[Category:Taxa named by Friedrich von Huene]]
[[Category:Archelosauria]]