ERC-721: Revision history

18 September 2024

• curprev 16:4616:46, 18 September 2024 OAbot talk contribs m 20,100 bytes +17 Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot. undo

6 July 2024

• curprev 10:1310:13, 6 July 2024 Chris Capoccia talk contribs 20,083 bytes +310 No edit summary undo

4 July 2024

• curprev 17:5817:58, 4 July 2024 SimLibrarian talk contribs m 19,773 bytes +1 image caption style MOS:CAPFRAG, minor style guide edits #article-section-source-editor undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

3 May 2024

• curprev 16:5816:58, 3 May 2024 Jellyfish-skeptic talk contribs m 19,772 bytes +149 added link to OpenSea metadata standard, added link to OpenSea undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 16:5316:53, 3 May 2024 Jellyfish-skeptic talk contribs m 19,623 bytes −440 rephrased section title to make it more clear, removed first sentence as it was poorly worded and the concept of fungibility can be understood through clicking the link, removed the last sentence because it was stated in the prior sentence undo Tags: references removed Visual edit
• curprev 16:4916:49, 3 May 2024 Jellyfish-skeptic talk contribs m 20,063 bytes −22 fix poor phrasing undo Tag: Visual edit

21 April 2024

• curprev 19:3419:34, 21 April 2024 SafariScribe talk contribs m 20,085 bytes +1 Fixed punctuation! (via WP:JWB) undo

5 March 2024

• curprev 21:3621:36, 5 March 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 20,084 bytes +434 fix ref undo
• curprev 21:3421:34, 5 March 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 19,650 bytes −2,971 rm flagged trash section undo
• curprev 21:3421:34, 5 March 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 22,621 bytes −1,753 buterin's is criticism of the NFT market, not of the ERC-721 standard itself undo
• curprev 21:3321:33, 5 March 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 24,374 bytes −13,137 →Influence of work: most of this section is about NFTs, not *about* ERC-721. Derivative standards: please find an RS, else this is all only primary undo
• curprev 21:3121:31, 5 March 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 37,511 bytes −1,101 this is overciting, don't need low-quality sources to shore up the art sources; we already have the claim cited, Guardian quote is superfluous undo

27 February 2024

• curprev 19:0219:02, 27 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 38,612 bytes −1,672 How did I miss this one undo
• curprev 01:1901:19, 27 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs 40,284 bytes −44 Removing Duplicated Citations tag; I believe I dealt with this undo
• curprev 01:1801:18, 27 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 40,328 bytes +69 Finish references cleanup undo
• curprev 01:1301:13, 27 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 40,259 bytes −794 Karadag and Madine undo
• curprev 00:5900:59, 27 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 41,053 bytes −2,166 Arcenegui undo

26 February 2024

• curprev 23:5623:56, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 43,219 bytes −1,544 Solouki undo
• curprev 21:4721:47, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 44,763 bytes −247 Ostroff undo
• curprev 21:4621:46, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 45,010 bytes −533 Zimmer undo
• curprev 21:4221:42, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 45,543 bytes −784 Fix cites down to and including first Ross undo
• curprev 21:3821:38, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 46,327 bytes −383 Fix cites down to and including first appearance of Regner undo
• curprev 21:3021:30, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 46,710 bytes −533 "A conceptual framework" undo
• curprev 21:2721:27, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs 47,243 bytes −3,433 Actually why is this paper fully specified ten (10) separate times undo
• curprev 21:2221:22, 26 February 2024 GR Kraml talk contribs m 50,676 bytes −469 Why does the first footnote specify the same paper twice undo

18 February 2024

• curprev 13:2913:29, 18 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 51,145 bytes +34 Restored revision 1208472605 by David Gerard (talk): Restoring, there is still strong concern. Please review WP:OWN. undo Tags: Twinkle Undo

17 February 2024

• curprev 17:4117:41, 17 February 2024 Codeconjurer777 talk contribs 51,111 bytes −34 Removed notability tag: Article TALKPAGE has a thread listing RSs that may reasonably establish notability & are used in the article. SILENT CONSENSUS: RSs listed thr haven't been disputed as non-RS or specifically argued as insufficient to establish notability. Editor placing tag hasnt engaged with thread or raised any specific dispute with those RSs. If those sources establish notability then questioning other sources beyond them is outside the scope of notability tag so its UNWARRANTED to use undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 17:2117:21, 17 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 51,145 bytes −341 shorten a bit; removed ref that wasn't about ERC-721 undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 17:1517:15, 17 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs m 51,486 bytes +44 Reverted edit by Codeconjurer777 (talk) to last version by David Gerard undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 17:1117:11, 17 February 2024 Codeconjurer777 talk contribs 51,442 bytes −44 Removed duplicate citations tag: editor says usage of bundled citations are "idiosyncratic" (thus inappropriate) yet they are DIRECTLY found within the "Citing Sources" Guidelines under "Bundled Citations" and are part of Wikipedia's editing system. If use is accepted in a Guideline, then they are by definition accepted based on CONSENSUS and thus not idiosyncratic. If editor's logic holds, then use of all bundled citations would be disallowed despite being established consensus in a Guideline. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

15 February 2024

• curprev 20:2420:24, 15 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 51,486 bytes +41 the duplicated citations are there because of your idiosyncratic referencing style, perhaps don't use an idiosyncratic referencing style undo
• curprev 07:5207:52, 15 February 2024 Codeconjurer777 talk contribs 51,445 bytes −23,245 attempted to replace some redundant information related to the subject (implementations of it) contained on other pages with links to those pages. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 07:2107:21, 15 February 2024 Codeconjurer777 talk contribs 74,690 bytes −44 Removed duplicate citations tag due to a limitation in the editing system to solve it. The duplicate sources are contained inside bundled citations. Using "Named references" is not currently possible with bundled citations for specific sources so there is no way to consolidate repeating sources together. Unless/until Wikipedia allows this functionality, there is no solution for this, so it is not a problem for editors to solve. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 01:4401:44, 15 February 2024 Citation bot talk contribs 74,734 bytes +550 Alter: title, template type, volume. Add: s2cid, isbn, pages, date, chapter, chapter-url, authors 1-6. Removed or converted URL. Formatted dashes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 6/35 undo
• curprev 01:3501:35, 15 February 2024 Headbomb talk contribs m 74,184 bytes −49 clean up, removed: {{!}} IEEE Journals & Magazine {{!}} IEEE Xplore undo Tag: AWB

14 February 2024

• curprev 19:5219:52, 14 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 74,233 bytes +44 No edit summary undo

10 February 2024

• curprev 17:2617:26, 10 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 74,189 bytes −308 more crypto site undo
• curprev 17:1317:13, 10 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 74,497 bytes +36 restoring notability tag. most of the refs are about NFTs, which have an article already - not about ERC-721 specifically undo
• curprev 17:1217:12, 10 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 74,461 bytes −699 rm cryptocurrency site reprints, not RSes on Wikipedia undo

9 February 2024

• curprev 17:2517:25, 9 February 2024 Escape Orbit talk contribs 75,160 bytes +38 →Legacy: nothing about this section is neutrally expressed and it contains unattributed opinions. undo
• curprev 17:2017:20, 9 February 2024 Codeconjurer777 talk contribs m 75,122 bytes +2 fixed formatting of citation undo Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• curprev 17:1717:17, 9 February 2024 Codeconjurer777 talk contribs 75,120 bytes +64,273 Upon discussion and review from prior revert: Removed non-RS from crypto news outlets (cointelegraph, coindesk, decrypt), replaced sources with RS and/or deleted some content that did not have an RS to replace and verify it. Prior justification for revert (resulting in mass deletion of sections) based on use of mostly non-RS citations was not demonstrated undo Tag: Visual edit

8 February 2024

• curprev 15:2615:26, 8 February 2024 Bearcat talk contribs m 10,847 bytes +42 uncategorized undo Tag: AWB

7 February 2024

• curprev 09:2409:24, 7 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 10,805 bytes −790 rm failed ref, rm dicdef undo

6 February 2024

• curprev 21:5321:53, 6 February 2024 JaggedHamster talk contribs 11,595 bytes +43 Tag "The term "non-fungible token" (NFT) is not known to have been used to refer to NFT projects prior to ERC-721" as failing verification. Source does not say that. undo

5 February 2024

• curprev 10:5710:57, 5 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 11,552 bytes −726 this section is not meaningfully cited to third party RSes undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 03:1103:11, 5 February 2024 OAbot talk contribs m 12,278 bytes +34 Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot. undo

3 February 2024

• curprev 10:1610:16, 3 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 12,244 bytes −65,989 rv apparent promotional spam undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 07:3107:31, 3 February 2024 Codeconjurer777 talk contribs 78,233 bytes +65,989 Undid revision 1202495149 by David Gerard (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

2 February 2024

• curprev 22:1622:16, 2 February 2024 David Gerard talk contribs 12,244 bytes −65,989 this reads like an ill-formatted personal essay sourced to unreliable crypto blogs. Revert to last version without weird and bad sourcing. Competence is required, please format normally with a view to solid reliable sourcing undo Tag: Reverted