Editing Koo Stark
Notice about sources
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Take extra care to use high-quality sources. Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism; see more information on sources. Never use self-published sources about a living person unless written or published by the subject; see Wikipedia's guidelines on self-published sources and using the subject as a self-published source. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, see this page. |
Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
In another libel action in 2007, Stark won an apology and substantial damages from ''[[Zoo Weekly]]'' magazine, which had described her as a [[porn star]]. She commented "I am relieved that my name has been cleared of this false, highly damaging and serious allegation which has been proved to be completely untrue."<ref name=carter-ruck>[https://www.carter-ruck.com/news/read/koo-stark Koo Stark news release] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171113114400/https://www.carter-ruck.com/news/read/koo-stark |date=2017-11-13 }} at carter-ruck.com, accessed 25 May 2018</ref> In 2011 ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' called her an early "[[Kate Middleton]] prototype" and suggested that if she had not appeared in the film ''[[Emily (1976 film)|Emily]]'' early in her career she might have gone on to become the [[Duchess of York]].<ref name=telegraph2011>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/8319716/Koo-Stark-From-Royal-Romance-to-the-High-Court.html|title=Koo Stark: From Royal Romance to the High Court|author=Bryony Gordon|author-link=Bryony Gordon|date=February 11, 2011|journal=[[Daily Telegraph]]|access-date=April 15, 2011|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110310063230/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/8319716/Koo-Stark-From-Royal-Romance-to-the-High-Court.html|archive-date=March 10, 2011}}</ref> |
In another libel action in 2007, Stark won an apology and substantial damages from ''[[Zoo Weekly]]'' magazine, which had described her as a [[porn star]]. She commented "I am relieved that my name has been cleared of this false, highly damaging and serious allegation which has been proved to be completely untrue."<ref name=carter-ruck>[https://www.carter-ruck.com/news/read/koo-stark Koo Stark news release] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171113114400/https://www.carter-ruck.com/news/read/koo-stark |date=2017-11-13 }} at carter-ruck.com, accessed 25 May 2018</ref> In 2011 ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' called her an early "[[Kate Middleton]] prototype" and suggested that if she had not appeared in the film ''[[Emily (1976 film)|Emily]]'' early in her career she might have gone on to become the [[Duchess of York]].<ref name=telegraph2011>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/8319716/Koo-Stark-From-Royal-Romance-to-the-High-Court.html|title=Koo Stark: From Royal Romance to the High Court|author=Bryony Gordon|author-link=Bryony Gordon|date=February 11, 2011|journal=[[Daily Telegraph]]|access-date=April 15, 2011|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110310063230/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/8319716/Koo-Stark-From-Royal-Romance-to-the-High-Court.html|archive-date=March 10, 2011}}</ref> |
||
In November 2012, Stark appeared at Hammersmith magistrates court accused of stealing a painting by Dutch master [[Anthonie van Borssom]], worth £40,000, from the home of her ex-partner, American financier Warren Walker. She strenuously denied the allegation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/358682/Date-with-Dalai-Lama-delays-Koo-Stark-s-trial|title=Date with Dalai Lama delays Koo Stark's trial|work=Daily Express|first=David|last=Pilditch|date=17 November 2012|accessdate=19 November 2022}} |
In November 2012, Stark appeared at Hammersmith magistrates court accused of stealing a painting by Dutch master [[Anthonie van Borssom]], worth £40,000, from the home of her ex-partner, American financier Warren Walker. She strenuously denied the allegation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/358682/Date-with-Dalai-Lama-delays-Koo-Stark-s-trial|title=Date with Dalai Lama delays Koo Stark's trial|work=Daily Express|first=David|last=Pilditch|date=17 November 2012|accessdate=19 November 2022}}</ref> |
||
In November 2022, Stark was awarded substantial damages and received an apology in a court case brought against ''[[Daily Mail]]''{{'}}s parent company for a 2019 article which falsely referred to her as "a soft porn actress".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/nov/18/prince-andrews-ex-girlfriend-koo-stark-wins-damages-against-daily-mail|title=Prince Andrew's ex-girlfriend Koo Stark wins damages against Daily Mail|work=The Guardian|first=Jim|last=Waterson|date=18 November 2022|accessdate=19 November 2022}}</ref> |
In November 2022, Stark was awarded substantial damages and received an apology in a court case brought against ''[[Daily Mail]]''{{'}}s parent company for a 2019 article which falsely referred to her as "a soft porn actress".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/nov/18/prince-andrews-ex-girlfriend-koo-stark-wins-damages-against-daily-mail|title=Prince Andrew's ex-girlfriend Koo Stark wins damages against Daily Mail|work=The Guardian|first=Jim|last=Waterson|date=18 November 2022|accessdate=19 November 2022}}</ref> |