Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Talk:Act of Sederunt

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LiamMcS (talk | contribs) at 17:44, 14 October 2017 (Reversion of revision 30862431: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 7 years ago by LiamMcS in topic Reversion of revision 30862431
Former good article nomineeAct of Sederunt was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 18, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed

Reversion of revision 30862431

I've reverted revision 30862431 for the following reasons.

  • Wording edits are to commented-out text that is not part of the article text.
  • Remaining edits are largely stylistic choice with no benefits either way, such as:
  • The rephrasing to "replacing its de facto power" is uncited. The 1532 Act did not grant the Court any power to make Acts of Sederunt. Until the 1540 Act, it was Parliament that held the power. If there existed a de facto power in addition to Parliament's power, there should be a citation.

LiamMcS (talk) 17:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply