Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Talk:Pablo Neruda

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.172.186.229 (talk) at 19:37, 25 April 2009 (What about the poetry?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 16 years ago by Eizmarcos in topic Neruda's pseudonym

Template:WP1.0

Neruda's pseudonym

This topic has been revived from the archives since there has been no discussion about it. There seems to be considerable doubt that Neruda's pen name derived from Czech writer and poet Jan Neruda. Apparently Neruda never agreed to reveal the origin of his pseudonym and it seems that a journalist forced that theory. There is an interesting hypothesis published on the web by a Spanish physician. According to that the name derives from the violinist Wilma Neruda which he admired a lot. Unfortunately the following article by Enrique Robertson is only written in Spanish.

Article by Enrique Robertson --Moroderen (talk) 07:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


Several have pointed that Neruda may have known of Wilma Neruda when he was assuming his pen name, but in his memoirs, he admits it was for Jan Neruda and how he had once placed flowers at a statue of Jan while traveling in Czechoslovakia. But still, perhaps he did get it from the violinist, Neruda wasn't always exactly honest in his memoirs Eizmarcos (talk) 01:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quote from Weekly Standard =

What was tagged as a "full English translation" was in fact anything but, as anybody who can read the Spanish original can tell: it was a clumsy translation of disconnected passages (some of them, including "Malenkov will continue his work", in the voice of a character in the poem) that have been deceptively collated. Feketekave (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography?

A chronological, complete list of (at least major) works toward the end of the article seems in my recollection to be pretty standard Wikipedia practice for authors/artists/etc., as well as a pretty useful reference. 74.74.251.190 (talk) 04:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

What about the poetry?

The article is an excellent description of his life but not a word about his poetry. What does it mean? Has there been critical reviews? What are the themes? Did he have a poetic theory? Why should I read him? Why was he said to be the most important poet of the 20th century?