Content deleted Content added
Phil Bridger (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 16:
:::::Again someone remove the tag but references did not clear up everything. Kingdom of Georgia was not part of pan-Caucasian ideology, which is modern development, not medeival. Also, source cited by Lakoba mention pan-Caucasian only once, only saying it "coincided" with one of the local states. "Coincide" is not same as being part of some knid of pan-Caucasian project. You should explain this here, not by repeatedly removing tag.--[[User:LeontinaVarlamonva|LeontinaVarlamonva]] ([[User talk:LeontinaVarlamonva|talk]]) 17:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
::::::It seems that you are basing your comments here, and your edits to the article, on what you think you know rather than on what reliable sources write. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 18:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
:::::::Where, for example, in reliable source does it say that Kingdom of Georgia was pan-Caucasian project? The only citation I see is Stephen Rapp and there he uses "pan-Caucasian" in strictly territorial sense. Kingdom of Georgia was not about cooperation or integration with neighbors, as in this 20th century ideology - it was just a kingdom that happen to cover all Caucasus. It is not correct to stretch modern ideology to apply to middle ages retroactively.--[[User:LeontinaVarlamonva|LeontinaVarlamonva]] ([[User talk:LeontinaVarlamonva|talk]]) 00:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
== Disruptive editing ==
| |||