Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Wikipedia:Be bold: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1158995921 by CactiStaccingCrane (talk) Graphics help break up large blocks of text. Did you find something objectionable about this particular graphic?
Tags: Undo Reverted
m →‎top: Typo
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 2:
{{redirect|WP:BOLD|the Manual of Style guideline on the use of boldface in Wikipedia text formatting|MOS:BOLD}}
{{redirect|WP:Rewrite|an essay on rewriting the rules of Wikipedia|WP:REWRITE|the cleanup template|Template:Cleanup rewrite}}
 
{{pp-protect|small=yes}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{subcat guideline|editing guideline|B|WP:BOLD|WP:DOIT|WP:FIXIT|WP:BOLDLY|WP:JUSTDOIT|WP:GOFORIT}}
{{nutshell|Please feel free to make improvements to Wikipedia in a fair and accurate manner.}}
</noinclude>
{{nutshell|Go for it.}}
[[File:ORTOGRAFIA eng.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|alt=Adult: Wikipedia has grammatical and orthographic mistakes! See? Were this a serious publication, I would send a letter to the director, and another to the editorial chief! Child: Wouldn't it be easier and faster in to just correct them yourself?|... and the child is right to be bold.]] <!--Alt text is for the visually impaired, so it should be a transcription of the dialogue-->
 
[[File:ORTOGRAFIA eng.jpg|thumb|upright=1.5|alt=Adult: Wikipedia has grammatical and orthographic mistakes! See? Were this a serious publication, I would send a letter to the director, and another to the editorial chief! Child: Wouldn't it be easier and faster in to just correct them yourself?|... and the child is right to be bold.]] <!--Alt text is for the visually impaired, so it should be a transcription of the dialogue-->
{{Guideline list}}
 
'''Be bold''' can best be explained in three words: "Go for it." We would like <em>everyone</em> to '''be bold''' and help make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. How many times have you read something and thought—''Why doesn't this page have [[Wikipedia:Basic copyediting|correct spelling, proper grammar, or a better layout]]?'' [[Wiki]]s like ours develop faster when everybody helps to fix problems, correct grammar, add facts, make sure wording is accurate, etc.
 
'''Fix it yourself instead of just talking about it.''' In the time it takes to write about the problem, you could instead improve the encyclopedia. Wikipedia not only lets you add and edit articles: it ''wants'' you to do it.
 
'''Do not be upset if your bold edits get reverted.''' Of course, others here will edit what you write. [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Do not take it personally]]! They, like all of us, just wish to make Wikipedia as good an encyclopedia as it can possibly be. Also, when you see a conflict in a [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]], do not be just a "mute spectator"; be bold and drop your opinion there; see [[WikipediaWP:BOLD,EPTALK|the revert,official discusspolicy cycleon talking and editing]] for more! On some of the less- prominent articles on Wikipedia that have a lower editing rate, your bold edit might not be responded to immediately. Think about it this way: if you don't find one of your edits being reverted now and then, perhaps you're not being bold enough.
{{TOC limit|2}}
 
== Be careful ==
{{anchor|... but don't be reckless!|... but please be careful!}}
[[File:Be bold.svg|left|240pxupright=0.75|frameless|alt=]]
{{shortcut|WP:CAREFUL|WP:RECKLESS}}
 
ThoughAlthough the boldness of contributors like you is one of Wikipedia's greatest assets, it is important that you take care of the common good and not [[WP:Disruptive editing|edit disruptively]] or recklessly. Of course, any changes you make that turn out badly can be reverted easily, usually painlessly, and it is important not to feel insulted if your changes are reverted or edited further. ButHowever, some significant changes can be long-lasting and harder to fix. If you're unsure of anything, just [[Wikipedia:Questions|ask for advice]].
 
Also, changes to articles on [[WP:Controversial articles|complex, controversial subjects]] with long histories or [[Wikipedia:General_sanctions#Active_sanctions|active sanctions]], or to [[WP:FA|Featured Articles]] and [[WP:GA|Good Articles]], should be done with extra care. In many cases, the text as you find it has come into being after long and arduous negotiations between Wikipedians of diverse backgrounds and points of view. A careless edit to such an article might stir up a latent conflict, and other users who are involved in the page may become defensive. If you would like to make a significant edit—not just a simple [[copyedit]]—to an article on a controversial subject, it is a useful idea to first read the article in its entirety and skim the comments on the [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]]. On controversial articles, the safest course is to [[WP:CAUTIOUS|be cautious]] and find [[WP:CON|consensus]] before making changes, but there are situations when bold edits can safely be made to contentious articles. Always use your very best editorial judgment in these cases and be sure to read the talk page.
Line 54:
{{See|Wikipedia:Template namespace#Guidelines}}
 
One must be especially careful when being bold with [[Wikipedia:Template namespace|templates]]: updating them can have far -reaching consequences because one change can affect lots of pages at once. Moreover, some templates are part of a wide-ranging, uniform ''system'' of templates ''across'' Wikipedia, e.g. [[Wikipedia:Glossary#Infobox|infoboxes]] and [[Wikipedia:Stub|stubs]]. Remember, all source code is easily broken by untested changes (but always quite fixable).
 
Because of these concerns, many [[Wikipedia:List of indefinitely protected pages#High use templates|heavily used templates]] are [[WP:HRT|indefinitely protected]] from editing. Before editing templates, consider proposing any changes on the associated talk pages and announcing the proposed change on pages of appropriate [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProjects]]. Templates often have associated [[WP:TESTCASES|sandbox and testcases pages]]; respectively these are a place for the proposed modified template, and a place where the proposal may be trialed in comparison with the existing version.
Line 84:
Making major changes to the graphical layout of certain pages that are not articles requires caution (examples below). It is often best to test changes first (in a sandbox page in your userspace, or a [[WP:subpage|subpage]] of the page in question), and to discuss the proposed change with other editors before making it live. When many users edit pages for layout, different plans can conflict, and the page may get worse rather than better.
 
This is particularly true of highly visible pages, such as those linked to from the navigation boxes on the left of the screen. These often use intricate formatting to convey their information, and a lot of work has gone into making them as user-friendly as possible. Moreover, some pages form groups whose formatting is intended to be uniform. ''You should establish consensus ''before'' making design edits to these types of pages.'' Examples include the [[Main Page]] (which in any case is permanently [[WP:Protection|protected]]), the [[Wikipedia:Community Portal|Community Portal]], the [[Wikipedia:Featured content|Featured content]] group of pages, and the group consisting of [[PortalWikipedia:Contents]] and its subpages, as well as [[Portal:Current events]]. This does not apply to articles or normal portals.
{{clear}}
 
Line 99:
* {{tl|Sofixit}} (template message encouraging bold editing)
* [[User:Somebody "Notme" Else|User:NotMe]] (humorous essay)
 
== References ==
 
{{reflist}}
<noinclude>
{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}