Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cyberbot I (talk | contribs) Bot clerking, 39 pending requests remain. |
Requesting protection for Warlock |
||
Line 180:
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – ANI LTA back at it again, not sure if protection is the best way to deal with it but best to ask. [[User:Chaotic Enby|<span style="color:#8a7500">Chaotic <span style="color:#9e5cb1">Enby</span></span>]] ([[User talk:Chaotic Enby|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Chaotic Enby|contribs]]) 00:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—[[User:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot I</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 00:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
=== [[Warlock]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Warlock}}
'''Reason:''' Suggest indefinite autoconfirmed protection. Almost every edit to the page for the last four (if not fourteen) years has been vandalism by IPs or new/few-edit accounts, or reverts thereof. As long as the long-running IRL debate (among people who like or dislike warlocks) over what the word 'really means' continues, I see no reason to think on-wiki vandalism will ever stop. Few if any productive edits are made to this page by non-autoconfirmed editors; indeed, other than vandalism and reverts thereof, few edits are made to the page at all (cf. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warlock&diff=1247979284&oldid=1011336975 the few differences between 2021], 100 revisions ago, and now). [[User:-sche|-sche]] ([[User talk:-sche|talk]]) 01:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
| |||