Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Plus–minus sign

(Redirected from ±)

The plus–minus sign or plus-or-minus sign (±) and the complementary minus-or-plus sign () are symbols with broadly similar multiple meanings.

±
Plus–minus sign
In UnicodeU+00B1 ± PLUS-MINUS SIGN (±, ±, ±)
Related
See alsoU+2213 MINUS-OR-PLUS SIGN (∓, ∓, ∓)

Other meanings occur in other fields, including medicine, engineering, chemistry, electronics, linguistics, and philosophy.

History

edit

A version of the sign, including also the French word ou ("or"), was used in its mathematical meaning by Albert Girard in 1626, and the sign in its modern form was used as early as 1631, in William Oughtred's Clavis Mathematicae.[1]

Usage

edit

In mathematics

edit

In mathematical formulas, the ± symbol may be used to indicate a symbol that may be replaced by either of the plus and minus signs, + or , allowing the formula to represent two values or two equations.[2]

If x2 = 9, one may give the solution as x = ±3. This indicates that the equation has two solutions: x = +3 and x = −3. A common use of this notation is found in the quadratic formula

 

which describes the two solutions to the quadratic equation ax2 + bx + c = 0.

Similarly, the trigonometric identity

 

can be interpreted as a shorthand for two equations: one with + on both sides of the equation, and one with on both sides.

The minus–plus sign, , is generally used in conjunction with the ± sign, in such expressions as x ± yz, which can be interpreted as meaning x + yz or xy + z (but not x + y + z or xyz). The always has the opposite sign to ±.

The above expression can be rewritten as x ± (yz) to avoid use of , but cases such as the trigonometric identity are most neatly written using the "∓" sign:

 

which represents the two equations:

 

Another example is the conjugate of the perfect squares

 

which represents the two equations:

 

A related usage is found in this presentation of the formula for the Taylor series of the sine function:

 

Here, the plus-or-minus sign indicates that the term may be added or subtracted depending on whether n is odd or even; a rule which can be deduced from the first few terms. A more rigorous presentation would multiply each term by a factor of (−1)n, which gives +1 when n is even, and −1 when n is odd. In older texts one occasionally finds (−)n, which means the same.

When the standard presumption that the plus-or-minus signs all take on the same value of +1 or all −1 is not true, then the line of text that immediately follows the equation must contain a brief description of the actual connection, if any, most often of the form "where the ‘±’ signs are independent" or similar. If a brief, simple description is not possible, the equation must be re-written to provide clarity; e.g. by introducing variables such as s1, s2, ... and specifying a value of +1 or −1 separately for each, or some appropriate relation, like s3 = s1 · (s2)n or similar.

In statistics

edit

The use of ± for an approximation is most commonly encountered in presenting the numerical value of a quantity, together with its tolerance or its statistical margin of error.[3] For example, 5.7 ± 0.2 may be anywhere in the range from 5.5 to 5.9 inclusive. In scientific usage, it sometimes refers to a probability of being within the stated interval, usually corresponding to either 1 or 2 standard deviations (a probability of 68.3% or 95.4% in a normal distribution).

Operations involving uncertain values should always try to preserve the uncertainty, in order to avoid propagation of error. If n = a ± b, any operation of the form m = f(n) must return a value of the form m = c ± d, where c is f(a) and d is the range b updated using interval arithmetic.

In chess

edit

The symbols ± and are used in chess annotation to denote a moderate but significant advantage for White and Black, respectively.[4] Weaker and stronger advantages are denoted by and for only a slight advantage, and +– and –+ for a strong, potentially winning advantage, again for White and Black respectively.[5]

Other meanings

edit

Encodings

edit
  • In Unicode: U+00B1 ± PLUS-MINUS SIGN
  • In ISO 8859-1, -7, -8, -9, -13, -15, and -16, the plus–minus symbol is code 0xB1hex. This location was copied to Unicode.
  • The symbol also has a HTML entity representations of ±, ±, and ±.
  • The rarer minus–plus sign is not generally found in legacy encodings, but is available in Unicode as U+2213 MINUS-OR-PLUS SIGN so can be used in HTML using ∓ or ∓.
  • In TeX 'plus-or-minus' and 'minus-or-plus' symbols are denoted \pm and \mp, respectively.
  • Although these characters may be approximated by underlining or overlining a + symbol ( +  or + ), this is discouraged because the formatting may be stripped at a later date, changing the meaning. It also makes the meaning less accessible to blind users with screen readers.

Typing

edit
  • Windows: Alt+241 or Alt+0177 (numbers typed on the numeric keypad).
  • Macintosh: ⌥ Option+⇧ Shift+= (equal sign on the non-numeric keypad).
  • Unix-like systems: Compose,+,- or ⇧ Shift+Ctrl+u B1space (second works on Chromebook)
  • In the Vim text editor (in Insert mode): Ctrl+k +- or Ctrl+v 177 or Ctrl+v x B1 or Ctrl+v u 00B1
  • AutoCAD shortcut string: %%p

Similar characters

edit

The plus–minus sign resembles the Chinese characters (Radical 32) and (Radical 33), whereas the minus–plus sign resembles (Radical 51).

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Cajori, Florian (1928), A History of Mathematical Notations, Volume I: Notations in Elementary Mathematics, Open Court, p. 245.
  2. ^ "Definition of PLUS/MINUS SIGN". merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 2020-08-28.
  3. ^ Brown, George W. (1982). "Standard deviation, standard error: Which 'standard' should we use?". American Journal of Diseases of Children. 136 (10): 937–941. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970460067015. PMID 7124681.
  4. ^ Eade, James (2005), Chess For Dummies (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, p. 272, ISBN 9780471774334.
  5. ^ For details, see Chess annotation symbols § Positions.
  6. ^ Naess, I. A.; Christiansen, S. C.; Romundstad, P.; Cannegieter, S. C.; Rosendaal, F. R.; Hammerstrøm, J. (2007). "Incidence and mortality of venous thrombosis: a population-based study". Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 5 (4): 692–699. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02450.x. ISSN 1538-7933. PMID 17367492. S2CID 23648224.
  7. ^ Heit, J. A.; Silverstein, M. D.; Mohr, D. N.; Petterson, T. M.; O'Fallon, W. M.; Melton, L. J. (1999-03-08). "Predictors of survival after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based, cohort study". Archives of Internal Medicine. 159 (5): 445–453. doi:10.1001/archinte.159.5.445. ISSN 0003-9926. PMID 10074952.
  8. ^ Hornsby, David. Linguistics, A Complete Introduction. p. 99. ISBN 9781444180336.