Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Talk:Affirmative action in China

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Han and affirmative action

edit

One thing which hasn't been added yet was that sometimes Han protest these affirmative action policies. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Promising source, but I cannot use this version

edit

This paper is promising, but unfortunately it states: "Extremely preliminary version. Please do not cite or circulate. All comments and suggestions are appreciated. "

If someone can get the final or cite-able version, that would be nice. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Affirmative action in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply