Blackwatch007

June 2024

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Sino-Soviet split, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Remsense诉 17:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Remsense thank you for letting me know i didn't knew about that. I will be precautious next time ! Thanks again! Blackwatch007 (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

Hello, Blackwatch007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Altacit global, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Dear @Chaotic Enby i created this page - Altacit global out of curiosity as i believe it qualify the notability guidelines of Wikipedia, i didn't wanted to mention the awards section but to prove the notability to my fellow editors and also to show the that the legal firm is important i wrote those, Apart from this i haven't used any advertising news article since according to the Indian penal code .....the Law firms in India cannot promote themselves according to Section 49 (1) (c) of the Advocates Act, 1961. Blackwatch007 (talk) 15:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. "Notability" on Wikipedia is defined by the quality of sourcing, not the number of awards, and listing many awards like this can make the page appear promotional. Even if you don't explicitly use advertisement as sources, it is easy to write in a promotional or non-neutral tone without realizing it.

Also, just to clarify, do you have any connection with the law firm? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ohh got it! so, what i will do is i will cut down the awards section by large quantity then, so, that neutrality can be restored and the overall content sounds less promotional. The sources are authentic as i tooked it directly from the awards page from where this law firm has it mentioning. for eg - Forbes India award section page and all

Coming to your other question, No, actually i don't have any kind of connection with this law firm since it is based in south India, i am based in UAE and I work in a different field that is with regards to genetics and also have alot of interest in history. Creating a page of organization is a challenging process based on what i experienced, as most of them have press release or self published sources so, it is difficult to create but for law firm i find it interesting as there are not allowed to self publish news articles or promote themselves due to advocate act 1961, india's law after which i thought, i can create a page based on this industry to check and improve my skill and have a better understanding of wikipedia guidelines based on company and organizations. Blackwatch007 (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)