Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Speedy deletion of Yuzo Watanabe

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Yuzo Watanabe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ged UK (talk) 21:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yuzo Watanabe

 

A tag has been placed on Yuzo Watanabe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 02:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

June 2008

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

Hello, Justiceiscoming. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Question on suitability for speedy_deletion regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Caitlin's Way (video game). Thank you. --Dynaflow babble 01:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have speedily deleted the article as a copyright violation. Please don't take copies of work in progress like this again. BencherliteTalk 01:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Parkway Northeast Middle School

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Parkway Northeast Middle School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Danwalk (talk) 03:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2011

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Watanabe, you may be blocked from editing. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of NooBTooB

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NooBTooB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zachlipton (talk) 07:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)Reply