Mereda
Deletion of "Departmrnt of Law Calcutta University" article
editHi,
I just simply cant understand why you nominated the article for deletion! I guess you have no idea about the Law Dept Of the CU as such. It is really a vast department with campuses equivalent wiht many full-fledged universities! Other than that, the North American based rankin is NOT APPLICABLE here in India. I request you to withdraw the deletion proposal.
Thankin you
Smartsaha —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smartsaha (talk • contribs) 03:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC).
- It's not a question of the department's size, it's about whether independent sources of evidence support the article. This department would be worth a separate article if there are multiple reliable sources WP:RS for what's written about it. And I don't see that type of evidence. --Mereda 07:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Mohammed Sabir
editThanks for noticing me on that article. It looks much better and notable with the links you added. Snowynight 17:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Sidor Artemievič Kovpak ancestors on the run for assassination
Me and my brother Sibirian Artjom (named after Sydor's father Artjom) we are the youngest of the four Great grand anserters of Sydor Kovpak. We need help and or life is in danger. My father has made for us a social program this program is of social effort and is the fight to rescue Missing children in the Ukraine in or name! For this we survived assassinations and now we are in a situation that needs attention of all who are involved in Sydor’s vision and heroics acts for the Russian and Ukrainian people.
I ask can you get in contact with us to listen to or story. Or email is 1400heroes@gmail.com and Verrazzo@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.61.202.149 (talk) 16:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Siddarth Prakasam
editThat's fine. I was vacilliating between prod and speedy and finally settled on prod to give the person a chance to move it to their userpage if they wanted. It does fall under the A7 speedy criteria though. :) ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs) 17:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
ndf
editThe Rss/BJP/Muslim league were not involved in the Marad massacre, it was the NDF and later the Araya Samajam. The terrorists massacred five Hindus at the beach, the police killed one terrorist in crossfire, the terrorists hid inside a mosque. When the police tried to get them, a mob of the terrorists wives surrounded the Mosque, barring entry.The police later found bombs, and swords there. By then, the Araya Samajam and VHP had evicted all terrorists from the area, and as of now, I dont think the terrorists have been able to return, even with pleas from the Communist party.Bakaman 17:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Uhh yeah the Hindu (which depite its name, is quite leftist), [1], [2]. The point is that BJP/RSS made noise about it, but did not partake in it. I was mistaken about the IUML (Muslim league). ITs seems they were involved as well.Bakaman 22:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Stellar Repulsion force
editDear Mereda. It is very surprising with regret to note that if some thing new and revolutionary -itis not acceptable to your world of science.Present science world is still in the same dark middle ages where great galileo punished for writing universal reality. Present physical science based on four centuries old theories of Galileo and Newton. But science is ever changing knowledge. REPULSION is not my first creation. Sir isaac newton imagined "centrifugal force" that is the off-centre-force(OCF)to balance gravitation. REPULSION is off-centre force(OCF). Einstein imagined "Cosmological constant" - for REPULSION FORCE to balance the universe against gravitation. We have possible to DISCOVER ELEMENTARY REPULSION FORCE - IS IT WRONG ? - take a magnet, it exert repulsion and attraction also. Accordingly, if stellar matter exert REPULSION and nonstellar exerts Gravitation and if this is proved reality - what is wrong ? When a hydrogen bomb is exploded - what kind of energy and forces releases ? light, heat and REPULSIVE SHOCK WAVES by which destruction spreads. Hydrogen bomb does not exerts FORCE OF ATTRACTION OR gravitation. Stellar bodies under nuclear reactions acts like hydrogen bomb.Stars exerts active REPULSION FORCE - NOT GRAVITATION.Time is riped to modify Newton's law which states "every particles exert Gravitation"- now, not every but only nonstellar thatis planetary state mass exert Gravitation which is free friom thermonuclear reaction, while stellar mass exerts REPULSION.
I REQUEST TO VISIT AND READ OUR WEBSITE BEFORE DELETION OF THE ARTICLE AND THEN DECIDE.
www.strepulsion.com
This is revolutionary article of our age. The deletion of the article by Wikipedia will be a black-spot in the history of science and in the history of Wikipedia. In the website - you will observe answer for all your problems. So think before deletion.
If you have any quary - or puzzle, please ask me. I am ready to explain.
Thanking you for providing me an opportunity to claim the truth. If you like i can send the whole Book on STREPULSION FORCE to solve all your problems. Please inform on which address shall i post it.
STREPULSION-PHYSICS is the new universal science
and SO5RLOD SPACE SYSTEM is new space technology -having strength to lead present space programs ahead by century, but based on STELLAR UNIVERSAL REPULSION FORCE and great NASA accepted STREPULSION FORCE physics for further research - and you are behind deletion of introduction of the new science.
Any how, If you want to delete any sentences or words of the theme to suite Wikipedia - I am ready for the same.please inform.
Thanking you,
Sincerely Yours
Dr.N.Chandra Shah.
Please intimate your response on navin@strepulsion.com or insriworld@yahoo.com.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dr.N.Chandra.Shah (talk • contribs) 04:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume II, Issue 1 - January 2007
edit
|
|
|
Thanks for the note – I'm not sure I'm 100% convinced he's notable yet, but I think he's probably on the verge, so my view would be to keep the article. Cheers --Pak21 18:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Office of Population Research
editNo problem. Wherebot picked it up, but you had fixed the problem by the time I reviewed the page. -- Butseriouslyfolks 21:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Prods
editThanks for the note, I have submited Katarzyna Kozyra and Jacek Yerka to AFD. You may also want to look at some of my other recents AFD (see Portal_talk:Poland/Poland-related_Wikipedia_notice_board#Catherine_Karina_Chmiel) and prods (see my edits history and look for summary 'prodding').-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 17:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to draw your attention to the above for posting new AfDs and finding out about them. Tyrenius 01:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:Afd
editHi, thanks a lot for timely action in the case of Gokak agitation Afd. I really appreciate your concerns and effort. Gnanapiti 19:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
PAG
editOK, thanks. I will add the stuff, and then extra later. Paul B 14:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Visual arts-related AfDs
editHere's a template to use in an AfD, when it has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Visual arts (please do list appropriate AfDs there). I think it should go under the article details and above the nom statement, as it is a formal notice and not part of the debate. It will sign your name with date stamp automatically. Please pass on to others.
Mnemonic: List of Visual arts-related Deletions.
Template to use:
- {{subst:LVD}}
Result:
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. Tyrenius 00:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
note
editAs a regular contributor to WP:DSI, I was hoping you could weigh in on the category discussions going on related to the page. There are in fact quite a few, and are somewhat stagnant at the moment.Bakaman 18:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume II, Issue 2 - March 2007
edit
|
|
|
As mentioned in Wikiproject India newsletter of March 2007, the weekly collaboration of the Indian wikiproject has fallen from its once high feats. This message is to request the users to visit the collaboration page and help rejuvenate it.
The present collaboration of the week is Religion in India. Please go through the talk page of the article to see the proposed changes in the article. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Russian and Soviet resistance members
edit
Category:Russian and Soviet resistance members, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on (UNCRC), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because (UNCRC) is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting (UNCRC), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
edit
| |||||||
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |||||||
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
==Proposed deletion of Caste in Sri Lanka==
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Caste in Sri Lanka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- no content
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jasy jatere (talk) 12:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Human Rights Documentation Centre
edit
I have nominated Human Rights Documentation Centre, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Rights Documentation Centre. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BJTalk 08:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 1 – June 2009
edit
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter, Volume IV, Issue 2 – July 2009
edit
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
University of Calcutta departments
editIn 2006 you commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Law Calcutta University I have opened new AfDs on it and a related article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Law, University of Calcutta and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Applied Physics, University of Calcutta and you may want to comment. DGG ( talk ) 21:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 1 - (June 2010)
edit
|
|
_in_Amritsar,_India.jpg)
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 18:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume V, Issue no. 2 - November 2010
edit
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to more contributions from you!
|
|---|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:46, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Richard D. Segal
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Richard D. Segal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SW— verbalize 00:35, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Category:Forest services (national)
editCategory:Forest services (national), which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 08:14, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest
editHello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.
As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.
If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.
You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.
ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)
Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. 01:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 01:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
The article Child Rights Information Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Global Development Awards and Medals Competition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://web.archive.org/web/20061001064005/http://www.gdnet.org/middle.php?primary_link_id=3&secondary_link_id=9. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 03:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
The article K. M. Cherian (doctor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unclear notability. Neither ref works. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Natalia Karenka Parra Sierra for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natalia Karenka Parra Sierra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Karenka Parra Sierra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Grutness...wha? 02:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for starting the article on Camfed over a decade ago. -Indefensible (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
"Video piracy" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Video piracy should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 25#Video piracy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Rainbows (charity) for deletion
edit A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rainbows (charity) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbows (charity) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 20:59, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The article Shroff Eye Hospital has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NCORP.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
The article K. P. Gopalkrishna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Having searched the net for references, I am convinced that K. P. Gopalkrishna entirely fails to meet Wikipedia’s notability criteria. The article has been unreferenced and tagged for questionable notability since 2014!
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)