Editing Foster care
Appearance
Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
=== Cross-cultural adoption policies === |
=== Cross-cultural adoption policies === |
||
George Shanti, Nico Van Oudenhoven, and Rekha Wazir, co-authors of ''Foster Care Beyond the Crossroads: Lessons from an International Comparative Analysis'', say that there are four types of Government foster care systems. The first one is that of developing countries. These countries do not have policies implemented to take care of the basic needs of these children and these children mostly receive assistance from relatives. The second system is that of former socialist governments. The historical context of these states has not allowed for the evolution of their foster care system. NGO's have urged them to evolve; however the traditional system of institutionalizing these children is still in place. Thirdly, liberal democracies do not have the support from its political system in order to take care of these children, even though they have the resources. Finally, social democracies are the most advanced governments in regards to their foster care system. These governments have a massive infrastructure, funding, and support system in order to help foster care children.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=George |first1=Shanti |last2=Van Oudenhoven |first2=Nico |last3=Wazir |first3=Rekha |title=Foster Care Beyond the Crossroads: Lessons from an International Comparative Analysis |journal=Childhood |date=August 2003 |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=343–361 |doi=10.1177/09075682030103006 |
George Shanti, Nico Van Oudenhoven, and Rekha Wazir, co-authors of ''Foster Care Beyond the Crossroads: Lessons from an International Comparative Analysis'', say that there are four types of Government foster care systems. The first one is that of developing countries. These countries do not have policies implemented to take care of the basic needs of these children and these children mostly receive assistance from relatives. The second system is that of former socialist governments. The historical context of these states has not allowed for the evolution of their foster care system. NGO's have urged them to evolve; however the traditional system of institutionalizing these children is still in place. Thirdly, liberal democracies do not have the support from its political system in order to take care of these children, even though they have the resources. Finally, social democracies are the most advanced governments in regards to their foster care system. These governments have a massive infrastructure, funding, and support system in order to help foster care children.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=George |first1=Shanti |last2=Van Oudenhoven |first2=Nico |last3=Wazir |first3=Rekha |title=Foster Care Beyond the Crossroads: Lessons from an International Comparative Analysis |journal=Childhood |date=August 2003 |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=343–361 |doi=10.1177/09075682030103006}}</ref> |
||
== Adoption == |
== Adoption == |