Pannonian Latin: Difference between revisions
Treetoes023 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Dating maintenance tags: {{More citations needed}} |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Extinct Eastern Romance language}} |
{{Short description|Extinct Eastern Romance language}} |
||
{{More citations needed|date=June 2024}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} |
||
{{Infobox language |
{{Infobox language |
||
| name = Pannonian Latin |
| name = Pannonian Latin |
||
| altname = Pannonian Romance |
|||
| region = [[Pannonia]] |
| region = [[Pannonia]] |
||
| era = |
| era = |
||
| ref = |
| ref = |
||
| familycolor = Indo-European |
| familycolor = Indo-European |
||
| fam2 = [[Italic languages|Italic]] |
| fam2 = [[Italic languages|Italic]] |
||
| fam3 = [[Latino-Faliscan languages|Latino-Faliscan]] |
| fam3 = [[Latino-Faliscan languages|Latino-Faliscan]] |
||
| fam4 = [[Romance languages|Romance]] |
| fam4 = [[Latin]] |
||
| fam5 = [[Romance languages|Romance]] |
|||
| fam5 = [[Western Romance|Western Romance languages]] |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Pannonian Latin''' (alternatively '''Pannonian Romance''') was a variant of [[ |
'''Pannonian Latin''' (alternatively '''Pannonian Romance''') was a variant of [[Vulgar Latin]] that developed in [[Pannonia]], but became extinct after the loss of the province. |
||
== History == |
== History == |
||
| Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
== Characteristics == |
== Characteristics == |
||
Analysis of the Vulgar Latin spoken in Pannonia showed several phonetical developments:{{Sfn|Gonda|2016}}{{Sfn|Adamik|2011|p=53}} |
Analysis of the Vulgar Latin spoken in Pannonia showed several phonetical developments:{{Sfn|Gonda|2016}}{{Sfn|Adamik|2011|p=53}} |
||
*the shortening of /ll/ and /nn/ geminates. |
*the shortening of {{IPA|/ll/}} and {{IPA|/nn/}} geminates. |
||
*palatalization of /d/. |
*palatalization of {{IPA|/d/}}. |
||
*the merger of unstressed /e/~/i/ ( |
*the merger of unstressed {{IPA|/e/}}~{{IPA|/i/}} ({{sc|Decibali}} for {{sc|Decebali}}),<ref>{{Cite web |last=Barta |first=Andrea |date=2009 |title=The Language of Latin Curse Tablets from Pannonia |page=26 |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11856238.pdf |access-date=18 August 2023 |website=core.ac}}</ref> but {{IPA|/o/}}~{{IPA|/u/}} fusion is less noticeable. |
||
*disappearance of /h/ from the 4th century onwards. |
*disappearance of {{IPA|/h/}} from the 4th century onwards. |
||
*/ns/ simplified to /n/, /nt/ to t - less often to /n/. / |
*{{IPA|/ns/}} simplified to {{IPA|/n/}}, {{IPA|/nt/}} to {{IPA|/t/}} - less often to {{IPA|/n/}}. {{IPA|/nkt/}} group was simplified to {{IPA|/nt/}} or {{IPA|/kt/}}, but it is not known why the development was not uniform. |
||
*palatalization of plosives /t/, /d/, /k/ is poorly attested. |
*palatalization of plosives {{IPA|/t/}}, {{IPA|/d/}}, {{IPA|/k/}} is poorly attested. |
||
*reduction of the diphthong |
*reduction of the diphthong {{IPA|/au̯/}} to {{IPA|/a/}} ({{sc|Ladicena}} < {{sc|Laodicena}}), and {{IPA|/ae̯/}} to {{IPA|/e/}}e ( {{sc|bone}} < {{sc|bonae}}). |
||
*lenition is attested (extricado < extricatus) from the 3rd century. |
*lenition is attested ({{sc|extricado}} < {{sc|extricatus}}) from the 3rd century. |
||
As in other provinces, accusatives after the 1st century AD were regularly switched to nominatives as the subjects of verbs, ergo -as was often written instead of -ae, which is the correct plural inflection of first-declension feminine nouns. Many instances of this error are found on a perhaps 3rd century epitaph from Pannonia. It says |
As in other provinces, accusatives after the 1st century AD were regularly switched to nominatives as the subjects of verbs, ergo -as was often written instead of -ae, which is the correct plural inflection of first-declension feminine nouns. Many instances of this error are found on a perhaps 3rd century epitaph from Pannonia. It says {{lang|la|hic quescunt duas matres duas filias... et aduenas II paruolas}} ([[Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum|CIL]] III 3551), which means "here lie two mothers, two daughters... and two young foreign girls".{{Sfn|Herman|2000|p=55}} |
||
The dative and genitive cases are evidently quite common in the inscriptions, and this ratio unmistakably indicates that Pannonia was where the dative-genitive fusion was most significant relative to the rest of the empire. Since the rate is 45% in Pannonia and 24% for the entire empire.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Fehér |first=Bence |title=Pannonia latin nyelvtörténete |year=2007 |location=Budapest}}</ref> |
The dative and genitive cases are evidently quite common in the inscriptions, and this ratio unmistakably indicates that Pannonia was where the dative-genitive fusion was most significant relative to the rest of the empire. Since the rate is 45% in Pannonia and 24% for the entire empire.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Fehér |first=Bence |title=Pannonia latin nyelvtörténete |year=2007 |location=Budapest}}</ref> |
||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
Accusative-ablative mergers account for 15% of case errors in Pannonian Latin.{{Sfn|Gonda|2016}} |
Accusative-ablative mergers account for 15% of case errors in Pannonian Latin.{{Sfn|Gonda|2016}} |
||
== |
== Historiography == |
||
The investigation of the language of Pannonian Latin inscriptions has been relatively neglected until recent times, until the appearance of the [[monograph]] of Bence Fehér in 2007: ''Pannonia latin nyelvtörténete'' (The Latin Linguistic History of Pannonia). Notable older works are Béla Luzsenszky: ''A pannóniai latin feliratok nyelvtana'' (Grammar of the Pannonian Latin Inscriptions) from 1933, and József Herman: ''Latinitas Pannonica: kísérlet a pannóniai feliratok latinságának jellemzésére'' (Latinitas Pannonica: Attempt at Characterizing the Latinity of the Pannonian Inscriptions) from 1968.{{Sfn|Adamik|2011|p=53}} |
The investigation of the language of Pannonian Latin inscriptions has been relatively neglected until recent times, until the appearance of the [[monograph]] of Bence Fehér in 2007: ''Pannonia latin nyelvtörténete'' (The Latin Linguistic History of Pannonia). Notable older works are Béla Luzsenszky: ''A pannóniai latin feliratok nyelvtana'' (Grammar of the Pannonian Latin Inscriptions) from 1933, and József Herman: ''Latinitas Pannonica: kísérlet a pannóniai feliratok latinságának jellemzésére'' (Latinitas Pannonica: Attempt at Characterizing the Latinity of the Pannonian Inscriptions) from 1968.{{Sfn|Adamik|2011|p=53}} |
||
Revision as of 01:57, 15 June 2024
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2024) |
| Pannonian Latin | |
|---|---|
| Pannonian Romance | |
| Region | Pannonia |
| Language codes | |
| ISO 639-3 | – |
Pannonian Latin (alternatively Pannonian Romance) was a variant of Vulgar Latin that developed in Pannonia, but became extinct after the loss of the province.
History
.svg)
Most likely the bigger part of the indigenous population spoke P-Celtic. This was influenced by the neighbouring cultures (eg. Illyrian and Scythian). Unfortunately, the surviving data isn't enough to distinguish their tribes' languages.[1]
The conquest of the region by the Roman Empire was completed by 9 BC, and the territory integrated into Illyricum. In 10 AD Pannonia was organized as a separate province.[2]
In Pannonia the material culture of the native population showed little sign of Romanization in the first 160 years of Roman rule.[3]
In the second half of the second century there were major changes in the composition of the population, but the organic continuity of the Latin language development of the area is unbroken.[4] The particularly destructive Marcomannic Wars changed the ethno-linguistic makeup of the province: speakers of the indigenous Celtic and Illyrian languages decreased in number, to be replaced by immigrants of different culture. This strengthened the position of Latin, allowing it to play an intermediary role.[5]
The Pannonian provinces were exposed in the Migration Period starting in the fourth century. By 401, mass emigration became general after two hard decades full with Germanic and equestrian nomadic invasions. Hunnic control expanded gradually from 410, and concluded with the cession of Pannonia by the Western Roman Empire in 433.[6] Only sporadic groups remained after the 5th century. Almost all families fled by the establishment of the Avar Khaganate in the second half of the 6th century, many moving to the Croatian coast or being taken by the Lombards into the Italian Peninsula.[6][7]
Characteristics
Analysis of the Vulgar Latin spoken in Pannonia showed several phonetical developments:[4][8]
- the shortening of /ll/ and /nn/ geminates.
- palatalization of /d/.
- the merger of unstressed /e/~/i/ (DECIBALI for DECEBALI),[9] but /o/~/u/ fusion is less noticeable.
- disappearance of /h/ from the 4th century onwards.
- /ns/ simplified to /n/, /nt/ to /t/ - less often to /n/. /nkt/ group was simplified to /nt/ or /kt/, but it is not known why the development was not uniform.
- palatalization of plosives /t/, /d/, /k/ is poorly attested.
- reduction of the diphthong /au̯/ to /a/ (LADICENA < LAODICENA), and /ae̯/ to /e/e ( BONE < BONAE).
- lenition is attested (EXTRICADO < EXTRICATUS) from the 3rd century.
As in other provinces, accusatives after the 1st century AD were regularly switched to nominatives as the subjects of verbs, ergo -as was often written instead of -ae, which is the correct plural inflection of first-declension feminine nouns. Many instances of this error are found on a perhaps 3rd century epitaph from Pannonia. It says hic quescunt duas matres duas filias... et aduenas II paruolas (CIL III 3551), which means "here lie two mothers, two daughters... and two young foreign girls".[10]
The dative and genitive cases are evidently quite common in the inscriptions, and this ratio unmistakably indicates that Pannonia was where the dative-genitive fusion was most significant relative to the rest of the empire. Since the rate is 45% in Pannonia and 24% for the entire empire.[11]
An examination of the Pannonian Latin texts as a whole reveals that the process of amalgamation has only begun in linguistic singular.[4]
Accusative-ablative mergers account for 15% of case errors in Pannonian Latin.[4]
Historiography
The investigation of the language of Pannonian Latin inscriptions has been relatively neglected until recent times, until the appearance of the monograph of Bence Fehér in 2007: Pannonia latin nyelvtörténete (The Latin Linguistic History of Pannonia). Notable older works are Béla Luzsenszky: A pannóniai latin feliratok nyelvtana (Grammar of the Pannonian Latin Inscriptions) from 1933, and József Herman: Latinitas Pannonica: kísérlet a pannóniai feliratok latinságának jellemzésére (Latinitas Pannonica: Attempt at Characterizing the Latinity of the Pannonian Inscriptions) from 1968.[8]
See also
Notes
- ^ Péterváry 2012, p. 19.
- ^ "Pannonia - Province of the Roman Empire | UNRV.com". www.unrv.com. Retrieved 16 August 2023.
- ^ Tóth, Endre (2001). "The Population: Dacians and Settlers". History of Transylvania Volume I. From the Beginnings to 1606 - II. Transylvania in Prehistory and Antiquity - 3. The Roman Province of Dacia. New York: Columbia University Press, (The Hungarian original by Institute of History Of The Hungarian Academy of Sciences). ISBN 0-88033-479-7.
- ^ a b c d Gonda 2016.
- ^ Péterváry 2012, p. 18.
- ^ a b Mócsy, András (1974). "The Beginning of the Dark Age". In Frere, Sheppard (ed.). Pannonia and Upper Moesia – A history of the Middle Danube Provinces of the Roman Empire. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. pp. 339–358. ISBN 978-0-415-74582-6.
- ^ Herman 2000, p. 13.
- ^ a b Adamik 2011, p. 53.
- ^ Barta, Andrea (2009). "The Language of Latin Curse Tablets from Pannonia" (PDF). core.ac. p. 26. Retrieved 18 August 2023.
- ^ Herman 2000, p. 55.
- ^ Fehér, Bence (2007). Pannonia latin nyelvtörténete. Budapest.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Bibliography
- Péterváry, Brigitta (2012). Adamik, Béla (ed.). A kelta nyelv hatása a pannoniai latinságra [Influence of the Celtic language on the Pannonian Latinity]. Eötvös Loránd University.
- Gonda, Attila (2016). "Fehér Bence: Pannonia latin nyelvtörténete. Budapest 2007" [Bence Fehér: Pannonia's Latin language history. Budapest 2007.]. Antik Tanulmányok. 60 (1). ISSN 0003-567X.
- Adamik, Béla (2011). "Konszonáns i és vele összefüggő palatalizációk pannoniai latin feliratokon" [The consonant I and related patalizations on the Latin inscriptions of Pannonia] (PDF). In Bánki, Ágnes; Tillinger, Gábor (eds.). Survivance du latin et grammaire textuelle: mélanges offerts à Sándor Kiss à l'occasion de son 70e anniversaire [Survival of Latin and textual grammar: mixtures offered to Sándor Kiss on the occasion of his 70th birthday]. Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó. ISBN 9789633181232.
- Herman, József (2000). Vulgar Latin. Translated by Wright, Robert. Penn State University Park: Penn State University Press. ISBN 978-0-271-02001-3.