Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Clapotis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 02:13, 26 January 2018 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.2) (Balon Greyjoy)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleClapotis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 2, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the clapotis (illustrated) is a standing wave pattern formed at a vertical shoreline?

‹See TfM›

WikiProject iconPhysics: Fluid Dynamics GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

GA Review

Not reviewing, but I note that this article was nominated twice: once under Mathematics and once under Physics and astronomy. I have deleted the entry under Physics and astronomy. If you wish to replace that one, please move the one out of Mathematics first. Cheers, CP 07:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be reviewing this article for its GA candidancy. The good news is that so far, this article passes the quick fail criteria, so a full review is forthcoming. Thanks, and good luck! FamicomJL (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA pass

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

While the article is very short in length, it's well written, properly cited, and the works. I have no problems totally passing this article. Great work to all involved! FamicomJL (talk) 17:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clapotis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]