Talk:Turbinia: Difference between revisions
→turbinia demonstration: new section |
m Signing comment by 212.93.199.154 - "→turbinia demonstration: new section" |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
One of the last survivors of the original Parsons/Turbinia demonstration, stated in the 1960s that Parsons had been asked by the Admiralty to demonstrate the performance of the Turbinia at the Spithead Review. |
One of the last survivors of the original Parsons/Turbinia demonstration, stated in the 1960s that Parsons had been asked by the Admiralty to demonstrate the performance of the Turbinia at the Spithead Review. |
||
He also thought that the Admiralty were hoping that Turbinia might distract attention away from the rows of battleships which were obsolecent and had to be towed to their public moorings. |
He also thought that the Admiralty were hoping that Turbinia might distract attention away from the rows of battleships which were obsolecent and had to be towed to their public moorings. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.93.199.154|212.93.199.154]] ([[User talk:212.93.199.154|talk]]) 12:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 12:38, 25 October 2010
Was Parsons invited to the naval review or not?
The text of this article states that 'Parsons ship turned up unannounced', a statement which is confirmed by the reference [1] however reference [2] states 'It was on this occasion that Turbinia after permission had been obtained (my emphasis), was to steam up and down the lines and astonish everyone by her performance'.
Employees at CE Parsons in the 1970's were told that he arrived unannounced and I understand that the Birr Castle site has good connections to the family and should be trusted, however this discrepancy between sources needs to be better explained and possibly reference [2] should be corrected if it is the one that is wrong.
I am emailing the webmaster for reference [2] to get their input, and will also get a message to the webmaster for reference [1].
(PeterIto 09:48, 1 November 2007 (UTC))
- Might be worthwhile including a link to the following pdf about Turbinia as it's got lots of detail about her, seems well researched, including the many different configerations she had, and also several photo's I've not seen anywhere else
- http://files.asme.org/ASMEORG/Communities/History/Landmarks/5652.pdf
- on page 7 it claims that there was "tacit approval" for Turbinia to appear at the Spithead review. Unfortunately it doesn't provide references...
- steve10345 (talk) 00:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Ships Start‑class 
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. 
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
turbinia demonstration
One of the last survivors of the original Parsons/Turbinia demonstration, stated in the 1960s that Parsons had been asked by the Admiralty to demonstrate the performance of the Turbinia at the Spithead Review.
He also thought that the Admiralty were hoping that Turbinia might distract attention away from the rows of battleships which were obsolecent and had to be towed to their public moorings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.93.199.154 (talk) 12:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)