Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

User talk:Augmented Seventh: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 169: Line 169:
:have a wikipedia day, [[User:Augmented Seventh|Augmented Seventh]] ([[User talk:Augmented Seventh#top|talk]]) 05:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
:have a wikipedia day, [[User:Augmented Seventh|Augmented Seventh]] ([[User talk:Augmented Seventh#top|talk]]) 05:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


::All information was sourced, the nonsense offered above as reasons are not acceptable. The 24 hour timeline remains the same. Then we shall see what the denizens of the WP "blood sports" page makes of it, and your edit history. [[Special:Contributions/14.2.205.177|14.2.205.177]] ([[User talk:14.2.205.177|talk]]) 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
::All information was appropriately referenced, the nonsense offered above as reasons are not acceptable. The 24 hour timeline remains the same. Then we shall see what the denizens of the WP "blood sports" page makes of it, and your edit history. [[Special:Contributions/14.2.205.177|14.2.205.177]] ([[User talk:14.2.205.177|talk]]) 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:26, 24 January 2024

Welcome!

Hello, Augmented Seventh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on People's Liberation Army Support Base in Djibouti. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 12:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

I can see you are a new editor, but you have already been warned by User:Macaddct1984 about Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Unfortunately, at Acre (state), you are again edit warring, this time to restore unsourced content which another editor has removed because it is unsourced--and according to them--contentious and untrue. Please take a moment to read WP:BURDEN, which is a cornerstone policy on Wikipedia. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another warning

You continue to violate wp:burden. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaneh_Shahr_Hall&diff=prev&oldid=1195511799 As you have been warned now a number of times above.

Yet you continue doing exactly what you were warned for. By a number of editors now.

WP:BURDEN is clear. This has now been explained to you a number of times. Your arguments that what you are controversially disagreeing with is "not controversial," and that it is not OR (this is precisely what OR is), are unavailing. And now you have increased your violations of wp:burden, after your warnings, with a slew of violations below.

04:26, 14 January 2024 diff hist +460‎ Sneeze ‎ Undid revision 1195511910 by 2A00:23C5:2685:8601:818D:719F:D49C:DBDA (talk) current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

04:23, 14 January 2024 diff hist +3,160‎ Glynis Johns ‎ Undid revision 1195513247 by 2600:1700:561E:A000:4AF:5E9D:90F7:2470 (talk) current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

04:14, 14 January 2024 diff hist +968‎ Khaneh Shahr Hall ‎ Undid revision 1195490537 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

04:13, 14 January 2024 diff hist +924‎ Shapur cave ‎ Undid revision 1195491252 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:16, 14 January 2024 diff hist +392‎ Shahshahan mausoleum ‎ Undid revision 1195487587 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:16, 14 January 2024 diff hist +487‎ Shahshahan mausoleum ‎ restored cited Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:05, 14 January 2024 diff hist +808‎ Sultan Amir Ahmad Bathhouse ‎ not original research, not controversial Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:03, 14 January 2024 diff hist +740‎ Nobar Bathhouse ‎ Undid revision 1195476643 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:02, 14 January 2024 diff hist +388‎ Jabalieh ‎ not original research, not controversial Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:01, 14 January 2024 diff hist +399‎ Arg-e Bam ‎ →‎History: restoring wanton deletion of non controversial content, Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

01:54, 14 January 2024 diff hist +879‎ Shazdeh Garden ‎ restoring non controversial Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

01:53, 14 January 2024 diff hist +1,627‎ Meymand, Kerman ‎ Undid unclear revision 1195489507 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

2603:7000:2101:AA00:900A:D8A2:DD0B:116C (talk) 06:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for taking the time to correct me on my reverting your tendentious edits.
I'm here to learn about these things; you seem to know a lot about how to carefully remove well written and uncontentious content around one specific topic of which you seem quite invested.
good on you for the primer, and for pointing, unintentionally, where the worst soft vandalism is occurring.
have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You appear not to have taken the above warnings by multiple editors -- three different editors in the past three weeks -- to heart. And understood wp:burden. The test for inclusion is not whether as you incorrectly believe whether the text is "well written." It is whether it is supported by reliable sources. If removed for lack of reliable sources, it is obviously a point of contention as to whether it should be included. And to restore it, you must provide inline RS refs. You have repeatedly flouted the rule. I would appreciate you abandoning that approach, and think it to your benefit to do so, as continued editing against wp rules can result in blocks. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:3875:8D93:E6B4:D38 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you seem to have a great sense of humor, and I'm glad you're playing along helping me create an online encyclopedia.
your adherence to protocol as regards policy, when it suits your poorly thought out edits, is admirable.
your concern about my tenure is misplaced; i remain the oldest active editor, and created large sections of the physics articles before wiki even came online.
be best, little soldier, Augmented Seventh (talk) 00:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I expressed no concern about your tenure; I believe you are confusing my edits with those of User:Magnolia677. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:64F9:FE25:4DEC:9B39 (talk) 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
that's super hot, thanks for mentioning your continued interest. Augmented Seventh (talk) 10:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Martin Luther King Sr.: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. To apply these warnings, you can use Twinkle or RedWarn, or you can do it manually. Thanks! Thriftycat TalkContribs 19:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for taking the time to instruct regarding tools and procedures.
thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Alexeyevitch(talk) 06:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you kindly for the editing pointers.
much appreciation, Augmented Seventh (talk) 07:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Capital High School (Boise, Idaho), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You added an alumnus without linking to her article, and you provided a non functioning URL as a source. Meters (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

got it thank you. Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

Hello, please make sure that when you undo or revert edits on a page that you consistently leave warning messages on the user's talk page. Twinkle can help you with this. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't use that feature, thank you.
thanks for helping keep my encyclopedia accurate,
s Augmented Seventh (talk) 15:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:WARNVAND, you really need to warn users. If they don't see an explanation of what they've done wrong, then they will often continue with the problematic behaviour. They might also be scared away from making future constructive edits.
As said above, Twinkle makes warnings extremely easy (just a couple clicks!), and it makes reverting faster as well. Thriftycat TalkContribs 15:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i don't use those tools when i edit, and i don't interact in that way with editors.
thanks for the heads up on the new tech. Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cave wolf

You have reverted my edits without an edit summary nor a good reason. Please reinstate them or I will not hesitate to WP:ANI you. You have 24 hours from now to make the changes. 14.2.205.177 (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

vulgarity was the reason, but upon closet inspection and reading over the citations, there was copius changed sourced information without new proper attribution.
if you would like to source properly and re-submit those for addition, that would be fantastic.
i think i left a message on your page, upon seeing the vulgarity, expressing my reasoning.
have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All information was appropriately referenced, the nonsense offered above as reasons are not acceptable. The 24 hour timeline remains the same. Then we shall see what the denizens of the WP "blood sports" page makes of it, and your edit history. 14.2.205.177 (talk) 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]