User talk:Bakasuprman: Difference between revisions

	Archives
	1-2-3- 4-5-6-7-8-9 -10-11-12-13 -14-15-16

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 04:20, 25 June 2007

Please click here for my DYK collection. Current count = 61.

/Majorcontributors

I give myself the authority to remove bogus warning templates from my page Bakaman _Bakatalk 04:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 3 June, 2007, a fact from the article Trivikrama Mahadeva, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Sean William @ 03:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated attempts to introduce ambiguity into Right Wing Hindu Party Bharatiya Janata Party page

Hi Bakaman,may I remind you , going by all the issues that I can see in your edit history to abstain from introducing ambiguity into Hindu Xenophobic organisation's pages to show them into softer aspects.Please see the two edits you did , [The first one] twists the language into making the issue incomprehensible for anyone new to recent Indian politics.Please abstain Mcleodganj 17:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your list of "names"...

... is really funny. And it says - something, about the nature of this project. Not sure what yet, but something... Yours, Smee 04:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

DYK

On June 5, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ghazi Muhammad, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again Baka. Keep it up! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 23	4 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Sockpuppeting administrator desysopped, banned	Admin restored after desysopping; dispute centers on suitability of certain biographies
Controversial RFA suspended, results pending	Dutch government provides freely licensed photos
WikiWorld comic: "John Hodgman"	News and notes: Another Wikipedian dies, brand survey, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bakaman Well Done

I know it's hard to digest the truth, inspite of verifiable links you RV the contents of Hindutva! Everyline of this article is biased and OR. I know if I write a single line without verifiable link, you have powers to block my ID forever and you will not spare me for a second, I can see that you have great knowledge and great contributor but it does not matter, The identity of gentleman is not measured with his knowledge but his manners. I don't that you even respect the rules of wikepedia. Since I abide the rules of wikepedia, I am not deleting anyline from Hindutva article as I respect other auhtor too have right to include verifiable contents.

With Love John Paul 12:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please

if possible please change the potrait of Atalji. I think there should be compatibly good looking and positive-impression pics available....

Thanks Jon Ascton

List of Hindu mathematicians

List of Hindu mathematicians has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this list might not be appropriate for Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:List guideline for relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 14:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thích Quảng Đức

During the Chef Goes Nanners episode of southpark, Chef holds up a picture of thich in front of him (on which the camera zooms in on). So this material does belong on the page. I was not trying to present it as triva since it was a paragraph and not a series of bullet-pointed sentences. I have left a comment for the user, who deleted it, on Talk:Thích Quảng Đức. I hope you will join in on the discussion. (Ghostexorcist 20:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Regarding your newest name

[1] I think he was calling himself an American, not you. And how is that negative in any way? I ask that because your list only contains the insulting names you have been given and not any of the commendable ones. Gizza^Chat ^© 10:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know were you were born :) I only know that you ethinically originate from India and currently live in the States. I don't know whether you moved or were born in America (I'm guessing America though). I also don't quite understand your neutrality in danger elsewhere comment but anyway, whatever. Have a nice day, Gizza^Chat ^© 06:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Goa Inquisition.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Goa Inquisition.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar 15:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Yogananda Giri

This article is very confusing. It is very easy to mistake the person described in it with Paramahansa Yogananda. I think you should clarify it. Best regards. Kkrystian 08:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Thanks for informing be about M. Chidananda Murthy. I'll try to expand that article in coming days.Gnanapiti 07:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 24	11 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Privacy report lists Wikipedia among best sites, but needing improvement	Board candidacies open, elections planned
WikiWorld comic: "Why did Mike the Headless Chicken cross the road?"	News and notes: Ontario error, no consensus RFA, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BJP Treat of de-reorganize

Hi Bakaman, I don’t want to conflict with you as you are the powerful man. Since you don’t want to have separate section for “Treat of de-reorganize”, I agree with you hence I created separate section to include the contents of anti Muslim VCD, but I wonder why did supporter of BJP changed their mind suddenly to dilute this major issue into a invisible little para! Few days ago this issue was like BJP national prestige. Anyhow we will leave it them and don’t get into details. With love to Bakaman, John Paul 10:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reinserted Threat of Derecognition

Dear beloved sir, Good Morning..I understand that you are sir a very prowerful person on Wikipedia and your highness are respected for valuable contributions on many domains specially regarding providing Hindus great respect.Sir, I am sorry but I have included a very detailed section on the threat to derecognise the Bharatiya Janata Party.This event is very significant in my humble understanding sir and there are some more too who think otherwise to you sir.You are genius sir...I respect you sir very strongly.I know sir, seeing your edit history sir, that you are undergoing some kind of issues bcoz of HKelkar, Sir.I wish you good luck Terminador 17:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Nobin

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nobin, by Anwar saadat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nobin is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nobin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Nobin itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your disruptive editing and revert warring have earned you a block. Have a nice day. Circeus 03:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the more inappropriate block notifications I've seen.Proabivouac 02:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

For edit warring, as described at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#edit-warring_duo, I'm going to block you for a week. Take a break, calm down, and try to be more productive when you return. Adam Cuerden ^talk 03:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Baka, thanks for your note of support at my RfA. Shyamal 04:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 25	18 June 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor
Wikipedia critic's article merged	Board election series: Election information
Admin account apparently compromised, blocked	Controversial RfA withdrawn, bureaucrats fail to clarify consensus
WikiWorld comic: "They Might Be Giants"	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oak

I agree with your statement on the talk page that he isn't notable. Are you thinking of filing an AFD? Let me know if you are. Thanks Gizza^Chat ^© 12:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never insulted you, I have criticised you of course. I don't mind never talking with you again but the problem is that our of areas of editing overlap. The best I can do is unwatch pages that you edit frequently where I don't really have an interest in. Gee, it is one thing to lie and another to do it emotionally. It is a shame you guys view everything in terms of sides. That's how this mess started. But I'll accept your request to try to stop talking with you ever again. Unless you really want to reply to this message, it is advisable that you and your friends don't because continuing the discussion is just going to hurt us more and more. Let the unwatching begin! (firstly your talk page :p) Gizza^Chat ^© 07:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Wikipedia:HoB invite

FAC

please support into Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Language_movement as the article about Language movement is in the FAC. And also give some help with the article if you can. Tarif from Bangladesh 07:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hi Bakasuprman bhayia, a new project has just started, Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladeshi Universities. Feel free to participate there.Thank you--NAHID 06:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

A million thanks(thank you, thank you...) for your support. Hopefully we will make it. I'll get you the update. Tarif from Bangladesh 20:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category deletion

Hi Bakasuprman. You recently nominated several categories (Category:Canadians of Indian descent, etc) for speedy deletion, with reasons that might be good reason to delete, but don't make deletion obviously the right thing to do, and definitely aren't speedy deletion criteria. If any of the categories were empty before you removed the articles, then you could nominate them for deletion under criterion C1, but I suggest you nominate the others for deletion at Categories for Deletion, so that some other views an be obtained before they are deleted. JPD (talk) 13:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nitin Gadkari

Can you please help take it to DYK.Shyamsunder 11:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manu Smriti

I would like to raise the bar on sourcing for this article, which is a popular soapbox. Would you help by giving the article a copyedit and challenging anything that looks like a weak source, POV, or other problematic content? The article keeps popping up as an issue on other articles, so I think that improving quality on it will have a ripple effect elsewhere. Buddhipriya 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Im cleared

checkuser cleared me.These people are trying to get me banned.But why did you put the tag on my page?Hkelkar

@@ Line 271: / Line 271: @@
 I would like to raise the bar on sourcing for this article, which is a popular soapbox.  Would you help by giving the article a copyedit and challenging anything that looks like a weak source, POV, or other problematic content?  The article keeps popping up as an issue on other articles, so I think that improving quality on it will have a ripple effect elsewhere. [[User:Buddhipriya|Buddhipriya]] 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
+== Im cleared ==
+checkuser cleared me.These people are trying to get me banned.But why did you put the tag on my page?[[user:Hkelkar|Hkelkar]]