User talk:Bishonen

Wikimood

Re: Permalink

Thank you very much, I didn't expect it to be that simple. Skäpperöd (talk) 18:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Cool. :-) Your account name looks completely Swedish to me. Are you really German? Bishonen (skål tammefan!) 19:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

There were times when Skåne was my second home :) Skäpperöd (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

You mean it's pure dumb luck that you're not User:Kropp, or User:Kvennaböske? Bishonen | talk 00:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC).

The username is not completely random, but my RL identity can not be traced from the name itself without further information (which I won't post here). I don't speak Swedish though, the year I shuttled between my residence and Skåne I used English. I learned some Swedish, but since I had no practice, I forgot most of it, and my Swedish is now limited to "öl" and "jag älskar dig". Back when I was more fluent in (Scanian) Swedish, I tried to make myself understood further north, and they told me that what I had learned was in fact Danish :( Skäpperöd (talk) 15:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

RFC/USER discussion concerning you

Hello, Bishonen. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bishonen 4, where you may want to participate. Ottava Rima (talk) 04:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

• Hi Ms. Bishonen. To be honest, OR does have acceptable writing skills, I'm really not sure why he would choose to engage in such disruptive behavior. I wouldn't worry about the RFC thing - doesn't seem to have any merit to it (and I've read through a lot of the diffs). IIRC Probably having one of those cupcakes is the standard in these cases. Cheers. ;) — Ched :  ?  19:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm behind the events, as usual

You're back? Glad to see you here, & hope it's not due to reasons of addiction. -- llywrch (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Llywrch. Was I gone..? Well, it is due to that, sort of. There's little enough enjoyment to be had these days.[1] Bishonen | talk 18:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC).

Well someone signed your name to an email to me that said you were leaving. Anyway, glad to see one of the "Old Bolsheviks" of the Wikipedia revolution still around. :) -- llywrch (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

I know, you would rather have cupcakes ...

... but I thought this might be more practical. Safety first. — Ched :  ?  21:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

safety equipment for "toxic" environments

What a kind thought, can I have one too? No dear, not a cupcake - a firefighter; I have always had a penchant for them. On the meantime, dearest Mrs Bishonen, have no fear at all - if it looks like turning nasty, I shall instruct my nephew to ride in to the page and your rescue; the dear boy is always such a soothing balm to inflammable situations. Lady Catherine de Burgh (the Late) (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

OMG, keep Giano out of there! Don't I have enough problems? Bishonen | talk 00:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC).

Why honorable lady Catherine - I had no idea you had an interest in such things in the physical realm. I am merely an organizer of sorts, but I shall certainly mention your generous offer to the young lads down at my local firehall. I can't imagine any of them declining such an educational experience. Giano? soothing balm? ... I don't recall those words being placed quite like that in any previous threads. Always something new to learn here. ;) — Ched :  ?  01:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh that's most kind Ched, could you get me an Italian one, such a beautiful race - all the men are so hansome and virile, compared to other races. Really, I'm surprised Mrs Bishonen doesn't think more of her figure and forego the cup cakes and utilise a fireman instead. Now regarding this other silly business, I really think it would be a excellent good idea if you asked dearest darlngestGiano to help you out - you only have to say the word and it will be crash, bang, wallop - problem solved. The dear gentle boy has a way with problems, I'm surprised you have not noticed. Lady Catherine de Burgh (the Late) (talk) 17:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Status report

So now Majorly has admitted the Rfc is not correctly certified, and that its a joke and he is the butt of it.[2]

However, he's been arguing against cupcakes as disruptive and an abuse of - get this - process, with which he is suddenly enamored. Well, love can sneak up on you like that, who am I to judge? I have commented on both the Rfc talk page[3] as well as his page[4] noting this sudden volte-face; I have requested he clear up the confusion generated by his conflicting statements.

Meanwhile, over at the Rfc Mfd - it almost sings, does it not? I have, alas, been forced to place a "weak keep" - there are, after all, now the cupcakes to consider! Not to mention (and I didn't) if and when another drama monger with a chip on his shoulder and a severe case of IDIDNTHEARTHAT opens yet another absurd Rfc on you, how shall they number their placement of the cupcakes? Will they count Hiemies cupcakes as four, and theirs as five, or will H's valiant carrying of the torch be relegated to an unread footnote to history, and counting resume at four yet again? You see the issues. I am still ill, but currently somewhat diverted. Yours, KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 13:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Majorly can say whatever he wants, but two people have signed off on it and have shown that they were involved in trying to stop Geogre and his actions while Bishonen was furthering them. That is enough to meet the standard requirement of an RfC/U. The section below is to verify that there cannot be any technical concerns. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Dispute resolution

Please explain why you aided Geogre's sock puppetry and resign. I ask because people feel that attempts to have you explain yourself and resign before an RfC/U has been made have not been attempted. This is to allow you the chance to do the above before it would be reopened if it is closed on the grounds. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

This is not dispute resolution, Ottava. DR would be "I think you aided Geogre's socking, dif dif dif, do you concede that, and if not, please explain your actions. I would also like to know if you plan to do this sort of thing in the future". What you've done is made an accusation with no difs, and then demanded she resign. That's not even close to dispute resolution. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 14:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

I never said -this- was dispute resolution. I am trying to resolve the issue directly at her talk page so there is clear proof that there was an attempt that you can't try to claim does not exist. I am tired of dealing with technicalities. As per your response, this will clearly be a failed attempt to resolve the problem. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

In other words, it was intended to be a failed attempt. --Akhilleus (talk) 14:32, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

That doesn't work, Ottava. You cannot make a "fake" attempt so you can "get on with" an Rfc. You have to actually, truly, try to resolve the issue. Otherwise, it isn't really an attempt at all, so you still have not met the requirement. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 14:37, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Since when were you put in charge of RfC/U? You sure do speak as if you have knowledge when the rules are quite liberal and relaxed. You aren't speaking objectively in any kind of manner, and I find it troubling that you are defending someone who hid a sock puppet that was used abusively for a very long time. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

No. If she apologized to the community for aiding Geogre's socking for a year and resigned, then I would drop the matter. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

To Ottava Rima

For the past week or two, I have been a silent target for your random inventions and ugly fantasies. [5][6][7][8] But I draw the line at you pestering me on this page. If there is anything you would actually like to know, as opposed to some abuse of me that you would like to get off your chest, you will have to get some ordinary, decent user to ask an appropriate question for you. Sorry. With some violence to my finer feelings, I am leaving your unpleasant foolishness above in place — for the moment. Any further post from you on this page will be removed. I request other users to help with this in case I'm not around. Bishonen | talk 17:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC).

Don't pretend to be the victim. You came to the Drapier's Letters while it was at FAC and removed something that was utterly essential without discussion. You knew that it was the original dispute between Geogre and I, and you knew that Swift articles were the original problem because you were involved in it. It was not a coincidence that you came there and decided to antagonize and started deleting things inappropriately. You should have been banned long, long ago for your constant abuse and shady tactics. Then this encyclopedia would actually be something worth while. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:02, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Vexatious litigation by Ottava Rima

[9] Bishonen | talk 17:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC).