Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WYAM-LD: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:35, 3 September 2023

WYAM-LD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; no sources; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Alabama. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep This might pass the GNG. I've at least shorn it of all the advertising crud. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:27, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I would say stations are a special circumstances of Rabbitears being good enough to showcase notability. Sure, 90 something percent of people in the US have never heard of WYAM, but the same exact thing can be said of all stations where (with the exception of large markets like Chicago) the only content would invariably be the the infobox, station history, list of staff, etc. Wikipedia's coverage of stations overall is moreso a database so if this got deleted, most station articles might as well be deleted too.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 13:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 13:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|WYAM-LD]]</noinclude></p>
 :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 12:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|WYAM-LD]]</noinclude></p>
+* '''Keep''' I would say stations are a special circumstances of Rabbitears being good enough to showcase notability. Sure, 90 something percent of people in the US have never heard of WYAM, but the same exact thing can be said of all stations where (with the exception of large markets like Chicago) the only content would invariably be the the infobox, station history, list of staff, etc. Wikipedia's coverage of stations overall is moreso a database so if this got deleted, most station articles might as well be deleted too.—[[User:Mythdon|<span style="color:green">Mythdon</span>]] ([[User talk:Mythdon|<span style="color:teal">talk</span>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mythdon|<span style="color:teal">contribs</span>]]) 13:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)