Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-05-16/Comix: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:49, 16 May 2024

← Back to Comix

Discuss this story

Here's what syscourse means in case balding cane-using Wikipedians with low-riding pants are wondering. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this isn't funny, and if it's trying to make a point, i don't know what it is. ltb d l (talk) 13:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The point is obvious, silly: Ancient Wikipedians with abnormally short legs are stupid. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This feels like a mangling of interesting aspects of Wikipedia. I feel like there's two things here: queer youths (which I would count myself among) versus old professors is one of them. I think minimizing the spectrum between these different types of people and the amazing way they work together is a shame. The other is Wikipedia bureaucrats versus externally expert writers. Quoting Wikipedia policies at people in a smug way sucks! It's interesting that the sticking point here is a bad source that is relatively recent, it's hard to know what to really make of that, for me. Anyway, I'm sorry if Generalissima feels alienated by us youths with our neopronouns and syscourse :/ I hope we can figure out together how to replace Smith (2018) with a better source. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 14:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the Wikipedia equivalent of a "phone bad i hate my wife" boomer comic?DogsRNice (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:23, 16 May 2024 edit Maplestrip (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 26,797 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:49, 16 May 2024 edit undo DogsRNice (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,285 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	This feels like a mangling of interesting aspects of Wikipedia. I feel like there's two things here: queer youths (which I would count myself among) versus old professors is one of them. I think minimizing the spectrum between these different types of people and the amazing way they work together is a shame. The other is Wikipedia bureaucrats versus externally expert writers. Quoting Wikipedia policies at people in a smug way sucks! It's interesting that the sticking point here is a bad source that is relatively recent, it's hard to know what to really make of that, for me. Anyway, I'm sorry if Generalissima feels alienated by us youths with our neopronouns and syscourse :/ I hope we can figure out together how to replace Smith (2018) with a better source. ~[[User:Maplestrip\|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip\|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 14:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)		This feels like a mangling of interesting aspects of Wikipedia. I feel like there's two things here: queer youths (which I would count myself among) versus old professors is one of them. I think minimizing the spectrum between these different types of people and the amazing way they work together is a shame. The other is Wikipedia bureaucrats versus externally expert writers. Quoting Wikipedia policies at people in a smug way sucks! It's interesting that the sticking point here is a bad source that is relatively recent, it's hard to know what to really make of that, for me. Anyway, I'm sorry if Generalissima feels alienated by us youths with our neopronouns and syscourse :/ I hope we can figure out together how to replace Smith (2018) with a better source. ~[[User:Maplestrip\|<span style="color:#005080">Maplestrip/Mable</span>]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip\|<span style="color:#700090">chat</span>]]) 14:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

			*Is this the Wikipedia equivalent of a "phone bad i hate my wife" boomer comic?[[User:DogsRNice\|DogsRNice]] ([[User talk:DogsRNice\|talk]]) 14:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)